单因素方差分析在异质性和非正态性下的实证比较:蒙特卡罗研究

Diep T. Nguyen, Eunsook Kim, Yan Wang, Thanh Pham, Yi-Hsin Chen, J. Kromrey
{"title":"单因素方差分析在异质性和非正态性下的实证比较:蒙特卡罗研究","authors":"Diep T. Nguyen, Eunsook Kim, Yan Wang, Thanh Pham, Yi-Hsin Chen, J. Kromrey","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1604190000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) F test is one of the most popular statistical tools to compare group means, it is sensitive to violations of the homogeneity of variance (HOV) assumption. This simulation study examines the performance of thirteen tests in one-factor ANOVA models in terms of their Type I error rate and statistical power under numerous (82,080) conditions. The results show that when HOV was satisfied, the ANOVA F or the Brown-Forsythe test outperformed the other methods in terms of both Type I error control and statistical power even under non-normality. When HOV was violated, the Structured Means Modeling (SMM) with Bartlett or SMM with Maximum Likelihood was strongly recommended for the omnibus test of group mean equality.","PeriodicalId":47201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","volume":"18 1","pages":"2-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Comparison of Tests for One-Factor ANOVA Under Heterogeneity and Non-Normality: A Monte Carlo Study\",\"authors\":\"Diep T. Nguyen, Eunsook Kim, Yan Wang, Thanh Pham, Yi-Hsin Chen, J. Kromrey\",\"doi\":\"10.22237/jmasm/1604190000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) F test is one of the most popular statistical tools to compare group means, it is sensitive to violations of the homogeneity of variance (HOV) assumption. This simulation study examines the performance of thirteen tests in one-factor ANOVA models in terms of their Type I error rate and statistical power under numerous (82,080) conditions. The results show that when HOV was satisfied, the ANOVA F or the Brown-Forsythe test outperformed the other methods in terms of both Type I error control and statistical power even under non-normality. When HOV was violated, the Structured Means Modeling (SMM) with Bartlett or SMM with Maximum Likelihood was strongly recommended for the omnibus test of group mean equality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1604190000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1604190000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

虽然方差分析(ANOVA) F检验是比较组均值最常用的统计工具之一,但它对违反方差齐性(HOV)假设很敏感。本模拟研究检验了单因素ANOVA模型中13个测试在众多(82,080)条件下的I型错误率和统计功率的性能。结果表明,在满足HOV的条件下,Brown-Forsythe检验的ANOVA在I型误差控制和非正态性下的统计能力方面都优于其他方法。当不符合HOV时,强烈建议采用Bartlett的结构化均值模型(SMM)或最大似然的结构化均值模型(SMM)进行组均值相等性的综合检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical Comparison of Tests for One-Factor ANOVA Under Heterogeneity and Non-Normality: A Monte Carlo Study
Although the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) F test is one of the most popular statistical tools to compare group means, it is sensitive to violations of the homogeneity of variance (HOV) assumption. This simulation study examines the performance of thirteen tests in one-factor ANOVA models in terms of their Type I error rate and statistical power under numerous (82,080) conditions. The results show that when HOV was satisfied, the ANOVA F or the Brown-Forsythe test outperformed the other methods in terms of both Type I error control and statistical power even under non-normality. When HOV was violated, the Structured Means Modeling (SMM) with Bartlett or SMM with Maximum Likelihood was strongly recommended for the omnibus test of group mean equality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods is an independent, peer-reviewed, open access journal designed to provide an outlet for the scholarly works of applied nonparametric or parametric statisticians, data analysts, researchers, classical or modern psychometricians, and quantitative or qualitative methodologists/evaluators.
期刊最新文献
The Performance of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Bell Distribution for Count Data Proportionality Adjusted Ratio-Type Calibration Estimators of Population Mean Under Stratified Sampling Moment Properties of Record Values from Rayleigh Lomax Distribution and Characterization Smoothing of Estimators of Population mean using Calibration Technique with Sample Errors Bayesian Estimation and Prediction for Inverse Power Maxwell Distribution with Applications to Tax Revenue and Health Care Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1