近代早期路德神学家与可救赎人口普查

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY Studia Historica-Historia Moderna Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.14201/shhmo20224415376
P. Astorri
{"title":"近代早期路德神学家与可救赎人口普查","authors":"P. Astorri","doi":"10.14201/shhmo20224415376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In sixteenth-century Germany, a particular financial operation called widerkaufflicher Zins or five percent contract sparked massive legal and theological controversies. This contract produced effects like a loan and therefore countered the interest-taking prohibition. Martin Luther (1483-1546), Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), Johannes Brenz (1499-1570), Johannes Aepinus (1499-1553), Urbanus Rhegius (1489-1541), Martin Chemnitz (1522-1586), Aegidius Hunnius (1550-1603), and Johann Gerhard (1582-1637) addressed this issue. They ended up reformulating the prohibition on interest and mapping out a set of rules for the right use of this contract. This article will survey their opinions paying attention to the points where their teachings resembled the Catholics or where they took a different path.","PeriodicalId":42400,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica-Historia Moderna","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Modern Lutheran Theologians and the Redeemable Census\",\"authors\":\"P. Astorri\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/shhmo20224415376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In sixteenth-century Germany, a particular financial operation called widerkaufflicher Zins or five percent contract sparked massive legal and theological controversies. This contract produced effects like a loan and therefore countered the interest-taking prohibition. Martin Luther (1483-1546), Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), Johannes Brenz (1499-1570), Johannes Aepinus (1499-1553), Urbanus Rhegius (1489-1541), Martin Chemnitz (1522-1586), Aegidius Hunnius (1550-1603), and Johann Gerhard (1582-1637) addressed this issue. They ended up reformulating the prohibition on interest and mapping out a set of rules for the right use of this contract. This article will survey their opinions paying attention to the points where their teachings resembled the Catholics or where they took a different path.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Moderna\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Moderna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/shhmo20224415376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica-Historia Moderna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/shhmo20224415376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在16世纪的德国,一项名为“宽利率”(widerkaufflicher Zins)或“5%合同”的特殊金融业务引发了巨大的法律和神学争议。该合同产生了类似贷款的效果,因此对抗了禁止收取利息的规定。马丁·路德(1483-1546)、菲利普·梅兰希通(1497-1560)、约翰内斯·布伦茨(1499-1570)、约翰尼斯·艾皮松(1499-1553)、乌尔巴纳斯·雷吉乌斯(1489-1541)、马丁·开姆尼茨(1522-1586)、埃吉迪乌斯·亨纽斯(1550-1603)和约翰·格哈德(1582-1637)解决了这个问题。他们最终重新制定了利息禁令,并制定了一套正确使用该合同的规则。这篇文章将调查他们的观点,注意他们的教义与天主教徒相似的地方,或者他们走了不同的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Modern Lutheran Theologians and the Redeemable Census
In sixteenth-century Germany, a particular financial operation called widerkaufflicher Zins or five percent contract sparked massive legal and theological controversies. This contract produced effects like a loan and therefore countered the interest-taking prohibition. Martin Luther (1483-1546), Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), Johannes Brenz (1499-1570), Johannes Aepinus (1499-1553), Urbanus Rhegius (1489-1541), Martin Chemnitz (1522-1586), Aegidius Hunnius (1550-1603), and Johann Gerhard (1582-1637) addressed this issue. They ended up reformulating the prohibition on interest and mapping out a set of rules for the right use of this contract. This article will survey their opinions paying attention to the points where their teachings resembled the Catholics or where they took a different path.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
¿Por qué y para qué enseñar Historia Moderna? Reflexiones epistemológicas y propuestas internacionales Fray Antonio González de Acuña: Procuraduría de un dominico limeño en Europa Episcopado, Iglesia y papado en tiempos del emperador Carlos V: una aproximación a partir de los escritos y la trayectoria de Juan Bernal Díaz de Luco (1495-1556) Unión Ibérica en los manuales de historia de Educación Secundaria. Un estudio comparativo entre Portugal y España El crédito en las notas dorsales de las cartas de obligación del archivo Daza (siglo XVI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1