保守的纪律

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10383441.2022.2085419
Stephen M. Young
{"title":"保守的纪律","authors":"Stephen M. Young","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2022.2085419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Tort law interrelates and overlaps with disciplinary power in complex ways that remain under-theorised. Borrowing from Foucault’s notion of disciplinary power, this article contributes to the theorisation of law and discipline and upholds tort law exemplifying that interrelation. Disciplinary power helps explain that the process of invoking rights forms productive and useful bodies for society, which has normalising effects throughout society. This argument is made by reviewing State of New South Wales v Talovic. There, Mr Talovic sued New South Wales in vicarious liability for police officers false imprisonment and trespass stemming from their allegedly wrongful apprehension of him under the Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW). Through a re-reading of this case, the author calls for a renewed critical focus on the interrelation of law and discipline.","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tortious discipline\",\"authors\":\"Stephen M. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10383441.2022.2085419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Tort law interrelates and overlaps with disciplinary power in complex ways that remain under-theorised. Borrowing from Foucault’s notion of disciplinary power, this article contributes to the theorisation of law and discipline and upholds tort law exemplifying that interrelation. Disciplinary power helps explain that the process of invoking rights forms productive and useful bodies for society, which has normalising effects throughout society. This argument is made by reviewing State of New South Wales v Talovic. There, Mr Talovic sued New South Wales in vicarious liability for police officers false imprisonment and trespass stemming from their allegedly wrongful apprehension of him under the Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW). Through a re-reading of this case, the author calls for a renewed critical focus on the interrelation of law and discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Griffith Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Griffith Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2085419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2085419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

侵权法以复杂的方式与惩戒权相互关联和重叠,但理论上尚不充分。本文借用福柯的纪律权力概念,为法律和纪律的理论化做出了贡献,并支持侵权法作为这种相互关系的例证。纪律权力有助于解释援引权利的过程为社会形成了生产性和有用的主体,这在整个社会中具有正常化的影响。这一论点是通过审查新南威尔士州诉塔洛维奇案提出的。在那里,Talovic先生起诉新南威尔士州,要求其对警察因涉嫌根据2007年《精神卫生法》(新南威尔士州)错误逮捕他而导致的非法监禁和非法侵入承担替代责任。通过重读本案,作者呼吁重新关注法律与纪律的相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tortious discipline
ABSTRACT Tort law interrelates and overlaps with disciplinary power in complex ways that remain under-theorised. Borrowing from Foucault’s notion of disciplinary power, this article contributes to the theorisation of law and discipline and upholds tort law exemplifying that interrelation. Disciplinary power helps explain that the process of invoking rights forms productive and useful bodies for society, which has normalising effects throughout society. This argument is made by reviewing State of New South Wales v Talovic. There, Mr Talovic sued New South Wales in vicarious liability for police officers false imprisonment and trespass stemming from their allegedly wrongful apprehension of him under the Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW). Through a re-reading of this case, the author calls for a renewed critical focus on the interrelation of law and discipline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualising the crimes of Big Tech The current legal regime of the Indonesian outer small islands Mainstreaming climate change in legal education Skeletons in the cupboard: reading settler anxiety in Mabo and Love Post-enlargement (free) movement in the EU: who really counts as EU CITIZEN? understanding Dano through the lens of Orientalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1