乌干达咖啡干旱指数保险的采用和偏好

IF 0.9 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Studies in Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2020-12-08 DOI:10.7896/j.2053
M. V. Asseldonk, David Muwonge, Immaculate Musuya, Moses Abuce
{"title":"乌干达咖啡干旱指数保险的采用和偏好","authors":"M. V. Asseldonk, David Muwonge, Immaculate Musuya, Moses Abuce","doi":"10.7896/j.2053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micro-insurance can be an effective approach to smoothening income in adverse times and potentially a way to contribute to the financial inclusion of vulnerable populations. As such, adopting a climate insurance coverage aims to adapt in reducing the vulnerability associated with anticipated negative impacts of climate change. Moreover, giving smallholders access to micro-insurance enables them to invest in improved agricultural inputs to enhance farm production and ultimately household income (Karlan et al., 2014; Marr et al., 2016). Key to success with this is to streamline claim handling and marketing efforts in order to minimise transaction costs (i.e. delivering a solution to a low-cost and at a large-scale). Emerging index-based insurance across Africa has proven to enable efficient claim handling. However, direct sales to individual smallholders remains a challenging task without an easily scalable solution (Carter et al., 2014). Adoption studies in the field of crop (index-based) insurance often focus on one-off field experiments ignoring often the insurance delivery channel (see for example a systematic review by Marr et al., 2016). Yet those insurance programmes that are currently running are frequently marketed via aggregators. To reach the necessary scale it is essential to cooperate with aggregators in the agricultural value chain that have an extensive outreach and shared interests. Such organisations include the financial service industry (e.g. insurers, brokers, banks and micro-finance institutions), input providers (e.g. seeds and fertilisers), traders, the processing industry, and farmer-based organisations. The current research seeks to find the determinants of adoption of a stand-alone coffee index-based insurance product in Uganda marketed by a farmer cooperative, and to elicit preferences for improving the index-based design and delivery model. Uganda is proving a particularly interesting context in which to develop the agricultural insurance market since recently public policy has begun supporting crop insurance by providing a premium subsidy (Van Asseldonk et al., 2019). Moreover, droughts are the main cause of crop failure in rain-fed production in Uganda and climate change is exacerbating the impact of drought events (Platform for Agricultural Risk Management, 2015). The findings can be valuable to guide the scale up phase by enhancing the design and delivery model.","PeriodicalId":44547,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adoption and preferences for coffee drought index-based insurance in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Asseldonk, David Muwonge, Immaculate Musuya, Moses Abuce\",\"doi\":\"10.7896/j.2053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Micro-insurance can be an effective approach to smoothening income in adverse times and potentially a way to contribute to the financial inclusion of vulnerable populations. As such, adopting a climate insurance coverage aims to adapt in reducing the vulnerability associated with anticipated negative impacts of climate change. Moreover, giving smallholders access to micro-insurance enables them to invest in improved agricultural inputs to enhance farm production and ultimately household income (Karlan et al., 2014; Marr et al., 2016). Key to success with this is to streamline claim handling and marketing efforts in order to minimise transaction costs (i.e. delivering a solution to a low-cost and at a large-scale). Emerging index-based insurance across Africa has proven to enable efficient claim handling. However, direct sales to individual smallholders remains a challenging task without an easily scalable solution (Carter et al., 2014). Adoption studies in the field of crop (index-based) insurance often focus on one-off field experiments ignoring often the insurance delivery channel (see for example a systematic review by Marr et al., 2016). Yet those insurance programmes that are currently running are frequently marketed via aggregators. To reach the necessary scale it is essential to cooperate with aggregators in the agricultural value chain that have an extensive outreach and shared interests. Such organisations include the financial service industry (e.g. insurers, brokers, banks and micro-finance institutions), input providers (e.g. seeds and fertilisers), traders, the processing industry, and farmer-based organisations. The current research seeks to find the determinants of adoption of a stand-alone coffee index-based insurance product in Uganda marketed by a farmer cooperative, and to elicit preferences for improving the index-based design and delivery model. Uganda is proving a particularly interesting context in which to develop the agricultural insurance market since recently public policy has begun supporting crop insurance by providing a premium subsidy (Van Asseldonk et al., 2019). Moreover, droughts are the main cause of crop failure in rain-fed production in Uganda and climate change is exacerbating the impact of drought events (Platform for Agricultural Risk Management, 2015). The findings can be valuable to guide the scale up phase by enhancing the design and delivery model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

小额保险可以是在不利时期稳定收入的一种有效方法,也可能是促进弱势群体金融包容性的一种方式。因此,采用气候保险的目的是适应气候变化,减少与气候变化预期负面影响相关的脆弱性。此外,让小农户获得小额保险使他们能够投资于改善农业投入,以提高农业生产并最终提高家庭收入(Karlan等人,2014;Marr等人,2016年)。成功的关键是简化索赔处理和营销工作,以最大限度地降低交易成本(即提供低成本、大规模的解决方案)。非洲各地新兴的基于指数的保险已被证明能够有效处理索赔。然而,如果没有一个易于扩展的解决方案,向个体小农户直接销售仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务(Carter等人,2014)。作物(基于指数)保险领域的采用研究通常侧重于一次性的田间试验,而忽略了保险的交付渠道(例如,参见Marr等人的系统综述,2016)。然而,那些目前正在运行的保险计划经常通过聚合器进行营销。为了达到必要的规模,必须与农业价值链中具有广泛影响力和共同利益的聚合商合作。这些组织包括金融服务业(如保险公司、经纪人、银行和小额金融机构)、投入提供者(如种子和化肥)、贸易商、加工业和农民组织。目前的研究旨在寻找乌干达采用农民合作社销售的独立咖啡指数保险产品的决定因素,并引发对改进基于指数的设计和交付模式的偏好。事实证明,乌干达是发展农业保险市场的一个特别有趣的背景,因为最近公共政策开始通过提供保费补贴来支持作物保险(Van Asseldonk等人,2019)。此外,干旱是乌干达雨水灌溉生产中作物歉收的主要原因,气候变化加剧了干旱事件的影响(农业风险管理平台,2015)。这些发现可以通过增强设计和交付模型来指导规模扩大阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adoption and preferences for coffee drought index-based insurance in Uganda
Micro-insurance can be an effective approach to smoothening income in adverse times and potentially a way to contribute to the financial inclusion of vulnerable populations. As such, adopting a climate insurance coverage aims to adapt in reducing the vulnerability associated with anticipated negative impacts of climate change. Moreover, giving smallholders access to micro-insurance enables them to invest in improved agricultural inputs to enhance farm production and ultimately household income (Karlan et al., 2014; Marr et al., 2016). Key to success with this is to streamline claim handling and marketing efforts in order to minimise transaction costs (i.e. delivering a solution to a low-cost and at a large-scale). Emerging index-based insurance across Africa has proven to enable efficient claim handling. However, direct sales to individual smallholders remains a challenging task without an easily scalable solution (Carter et al., 2014). Adoption studies in the field of crop (index-based) insurance often focus on one-off field experiments ignoring often the insurance delivery channel (see for example a systematic review by Marr et al., 2016). Yet those insurance programmes that are currently running are frequently marketed via aggregators. To reach the necessary scale it is essential to cooperate with aggregators in the agricultural value chain that have an extensive outreach and shared interests. Such organisations include the financial service industry (e.g. insurers, brokers, banks and micro-finance institutions), input providers (e.g. seeds and fertilisers), traders, the processing industry, and farmer-based organisations. The current research seeks to find the determinants of adoption of a stand-alone coffee index-based insurance product in Uganda marketed by a farmer cooperative, and to elicit preferences for improving the index-based design and delivery model. Uganda is proving a particularly interesting context in which to develop the agricultural insurance market since recently public policy has begun supporting crop insurance by providing a premium subsidy (Van Asseldonk et al., 2019). Moreover, droughts are the main cause of crop failure in rain-fed production in Uganda and climate change is exacerbating the impact of drought events (Platform for Agricultural Risk Management, 2015). The findings can be valuable to guide the scale up phase by enhancing the design and delivery model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Agricultural Economics
Studies in Agricultural Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Facilitating PLF Technology Adoption in the Pig and Poultry Industries Comparing the impacts of economic uncertainty, climate change, Covid-19, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict: Which is the most dangerous for EU27 food prices? Assessing the sectoral and cross-sectoral impacts of new European Union broiler chicken welfare measures in Hungary as proposed by the European Food Safety Authority Suckler-cow and sheep farming in global comparison – production systems and economics The profitability of site-specific fertilisation based on Sure Grow Solutions – A Canadian case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1