{"title":"是否在书架上:使用馆际借阅统计来展示目录和书架的完整性","authors":"K. DeVet, Ryan Litsey, R. Devet","doi":"10.1080/15367967.2023.2191852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Libraries are places where patrons find resources that can help them accomplish their information needs. One of the key elements of this need is being able to find what they are looking for. While much has been written about information seeking behavior and library wayfinding, however, there is a more fundamental argument. That is merely finding the item when the Library Management System says it should be on the shelf. In these little moments, the library has an opportunity to build a sense of trust with the patron. The patron can trust that an item that the library says is there, is there. It is also an opportunity for a library to have a small victory in a positive patron library experience. However, if the item is not there that small victory is squandered. The challenge though is large scale shelf checks for shelving integrity is cost and time prohibitive. What is needed is a quick way to determine library and catalog health. This paper will demonstrate how this can be accomplished by looking at the ILL statistics. While this may seem like a simple answer demonstrating it with statistical relationships confirms what many libraries may view as a forgone assumption.","PeriodicalId":35284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Access Services","volume":"20 1","pages":"25 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To be or not to be… on shelf: Demonstrating catalog and shelf integrity using interlibrary loan statistics\",\"authors\":\"K. DeVet, Ryan Litsey, R. Devet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15367967.2023.2191852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Libraries are places where patrons find resources that can help them accomplish their information needs. One of the key elements of this need is being able to find what they are looking for. While much has been written about information seeking behavior and library wayfinding, however, there is a more fundamental argument. That is merely finding the item when the Library Management System says it should be on the shelf. In these little moments, the library has an opportunity to build a sense of trust with the patron. The patron can trust that an item that the library says is there, is there. It is also an opportunity for a library to have a small victory in a positive patron library experience. However, if the item is not there that small victory is squandered. The challenge though is large scale shelf checks for shelving integrity is cost and time prohibitive. What is needed is a quick way to determine library and catalog health. This paper will demonstrate how this can be accomplished by looking at the ILL statistics. While this may seem like a simple answer demonstrating it with statistical relationships confirms what many libraries may view as a forgone assumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Access Services\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Access Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2023.2191852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Access Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2023.2191852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
To be or not to be… on shelf: Demonstrating catalog and shelf integrity using interlibrary loan statistics
Abstract Libraries are places where patrons find resources that can help them accomplish their information needs. One of the key elements of this need is being able to find what they are looking for. While much has been written about information seeking behavior and library wayfinding, however, there is a more fundamental argument. That is merely finding the item when the Library Management System says it should be on the shelf. In these little moments, the library has an opportunity to build a sense of trust with the patron. The patron can trust that an item that the library says is there, is there. It is also an opportunity for a library to have a small victory in a positive patron library experience. However, if the item is not there that small victory is squandered. The challenge though is large scale shelf checks for shelving integrity is cost and time prohibitive. What is needed is a quick way to determine library and catalog health. This paper will demonstrate how this can be accomplished by looking at the ILL statistics. While this may seem like a simple answer demonstrating it with statistical relationships confirms what many libraries may view as a forgone assumption.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Access Services welcomes the submission of research, theory, and practice papers relevant to the access services in libraries and archives of all types. Access Services is the broad field and collective term of all the services that provide, facilitate, and manage the access of the clientele to the information resources acquired or made available by the libraries or archives with the aim of allowing for easy and convenient retrieval of needed information, utilization of information resources to the fullest extent, and greatest availability of resources to each of the clientele.