用加拿大证据重新审视萨拉菲圣战恐怖主义中皈依激进化的解释

David C. Jones, L. Dawson
{"title":"用加拿大证据重新审视萨拉菲圣战恐怖主义中皈依激进化的解释","authors":"David C. Jones, L. Dawson","doi":"10.1080/19434472.2021.1919911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Evidence from multiple sources suggests converts to Islam are significantly overrepresented in the ranks of Salafi-jihadist terrorists. Researchers have been speculating for some time why this might be the case. This paper identifies, and critically examines, four hypothetical explanations commonly found in the literature: (1) some explanations focus on the significance of prior personal characteristics of the converts; (2) some explanations emphasize the rapidity of the movement from conversion to radicalization; (3) some explanations highlight the lack of religious knowledge on the part of radicalized converts; and (4) some explanations point to the role of the zealotry of converts. Examining each explanation, we find the causal mechanisms hypothesized are inadequate and the hypotheses are incongruent with the data we have collected on radicalized Canadian converts. In the end, we offer an alternative hypothesis, based on the analysis of the response of radicalized converts to an experience of disappointment that is common in the post-conversion period.","PeriodicalId":54174,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","volume":"15 1","pages":"246 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2021.1919911","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-examining the explanations of convert radicalization in Salafi-Jihadist terrorism with evidence from Canada\",\"authors\":\"David C. Jones, L. Dawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19434472.2021.1919911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Evidence from multiple sources suggests converts to Islam are significantly overrepresented in the ranks of Salafi-jihadist terrorists. Researchers have been speculating for some time why this might be the case. This paper identifies, and critically examines, four hypothetical explanations commonly found in the literature: (1) some explanations focus on the significance of prior personal characteristics of the converts; (2) some explanations emphasize the rapidity of the movement from conversion to radicalization; (3) some explanations highlight the lack of religious knowledge on the part of radicalized converts; and (4) some explanations point to the role of the zealotry of converts. Examining each explanation, we find the causal mechanisms hypothesized are inadequate and the hypotheses are incongruent with the data we have collected on radicalized Canadian converts. In the end, we offer an alternative hypothesis, based on the analysis of the response of radicalized converts to an experience of disappointment that is common in the post-conversion period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"246 - 273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2021.1919911\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1919911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1919911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要来自多个来源的证据表明,皈依伊斯兰教的人在萨拉菲圣战恐怖分子中的比例明显过高。一段时间以来,研究人员一直在猜测为什么会出现这种情况。本文确定并批判性地考察了文献中常见的四种假设性解释:(1)一些解释侧重于皈依者先前个人特征的意义;(2) 一些解释强调了从皈依到激进主义运动的快速性;(3) 一些解释强调激进的皈依者缺乏宗教知识;以及(4)一些解释指出了皈依者狂热的作用。检查每一种解释,我们发现假设的因果机制是不充分的,这些假设与我们收集的关于激进的加拿大皈依者的数据不一致。最后,我们提供了一个替代假设,基于对激进皈依者对失望经历的反应的分析,这种失望经历在皈依后时期很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-examining the explanations of convert radicalization in Salafi-Jihadist terrorism with evidence from Canada
ABSTRACT Evidence from multiple sources suggests converts to Islam are significantly overrepresented in the ranks of Salafi-jihadist terrorists. Researchers have been speculating for some time why this might be the case. This paper identifies, and critically examines, four hypothetical explanations commonly found in the literature: (1) some explanations focus on the significance of prior personal characteristics of the converts; (2) some explanations emphasize the rapidity of the movement from conversion to radicalization; (3) some explanations highlight the lack of religious knowledge on the part of radicalized converts; and (4) some explanations point to the role of the zealotry of converts. Examining each explanation, we find the causal mechanisms hypothesized are inadequate and the hypotheses are incongruent with the data we have collected on radicalized Canadian converts. In the end, we offer an alternative hypothesis, based on the analysis of the response of radicalized converts to an experience of disappointment that is common in the post-conversion period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of gendered frames in far-right rhetoric in the West Was the 2019 Christchurch attack a black swan event? Understanding far-right violence in New Zealand Understanding and addressing the risk of disguised compliance in CVE programming ‘It's time to put the copes down and get to work’: a qualitative study of incel exit strategies on r/IncelExit Frame your friends close and your enemies closer: how al-Masra newspaper imagines individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1