语义相似与互信息预测句子理解——以汉语悬置话题结构为例

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1080/20445911.2022.2154781
Kun Sun, Rong Wang
{"title":"语义相似与互信息预测句子理解——以汉语悬置话题结构为例","authors":"Kun Sun, Rong Wang","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2022.2154781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study uses semantic similarity and pointwise mutual information (PMI) to estimate and compute the relationship between topic and comment in dangling topic construction in Mandarin. It proposes three methods to calculate the semantic similarity between topic and comment. We also carry out experiments on human ratings of the acceptance degree for dangling topic constructions. The results show that PMI and three measures of semantic similarity can make good predictions for human-rated data. This is the first time that PMI and sentence-based semantic similarity are employed to predict how humans comprehend sentences as a whole. PMI and semantic similarity measures may further elucidate the concept of topic construction and to help in seeing how Chinese native speakers understand and process sentences. More importantly, this study creates a novel, effective and practical computational approach for predicting entire sentence comprehension/processing and syntactic analysis.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"142 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semantic similarity and mutual information predicting sentence comprehension: the case of dangling topic construction in Chinese\",\"authors\":\"Kun Sun, Rong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20445911.2022.2154781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study uses semantic similarity and pointwise mutual information (PMI) to estimate and compute the relationship between topic and comment in dangling topic construction in Mandarin. It proposes three methods to calculate the semantic similarity between topic and comment. We also carry out experiments on human ratings of the acceptance degree for dangling topic constructions. The results show that PMI and three measures of semantic similarity can make good predictions for human-rated data. This is the first time that PMI and sentence-based semantic similarity are employed to predict how humans comprehend sentences as a whole. PMI and semantic similarity measures may further elucidate the concept of topic construction and to help in seeing how Chinese native speakers understand and process sentences. More importantly, this study creates a novel, effective and practical computational approach for predicting entire sentence comprehension/processing and syntactic analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"142 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2154781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2154781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究利用语义相似性和点互信息(PMI)来估计和计算普通话悬置话题结构中话题和评论之间的关系。提出了三种计算主题与评论语义相似度的方法。我们还进行了人类对悬挂主题结构接受度的评分实验。结果表明,PMI和三种语义相似性度量可以很好地预测人类评级数据。这是第一次使用PMI和基于句子的语义相似性来预测人类如何从整体上理解句子。PMI和语义相似性度量可以进一步阐明主题结构的概念,并有助于了解中国母语人士如何理解和处理句子。更重要的是,本研究为预测整个句子的理解/处理和句法分析创造了一种新颖、有效和实用的计算方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Semantic similarity and mutual information predicting sentence comprehension: the case of dangling topic construction in Chinese
ABSTRACT This study uses semantic similarity and pointwise mutual information (PMI) to estimate and compute the relationship between topic and comment in dangling topic construction in Mandarin. It proposes three methods to calculate the semantic similarity between topic and comment. We also carry out experiments on human ratings of the acceptance degree for dangling topic constructions. The results show that PMI and three measures of semantic similarity can make good predictions for human-rated data. This is the first time that PMI and sentence-based semantic similarity are employed to predict how humans comprehend sentences as a whole. PMI and semantic similarity measures may further elucidate the concept of topic construction and to help in seeing how Chinese native speakers understand and process sentences. More importantly, this study creates a novel, effective and practical computational approach for predicting entire sentence comprehension/processing and syntactic analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Journal of Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Eye-movement methodology reveals a shift in attention from threat to neutral stimuli with self-reported symptoms of social anxiety across children, adolescents and adults Individual differences and counterfactual thinking Distinct patterns of emotional processing in ADHD and anxiety. Evidence from an eye-movement Go/No-Go task Why I am not a Turing machine Self and mother referential processing in phonological false memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1