一种新型惯性测量单元跟踪杠铃速度的有效性

Q4 Health Professions Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Pub Date : 2021-08-23 DOI:10.18176/archmeddeporte.00051
D. Varela-Olalla, Darío Álvarez-Salvador, Alejandro Arias-Tomé, Ignacio Collado-Lázaro, Aitor Gamarra-Calavia, C. Balsalobre-Fernández
{"title":"一种新型惯性测量单元跟踪杠铃速度的有效性","authors":"D. Varela-Olalla, Darío Álvarez-Salvador, Alejandro Arias-Tomé, Ignacio Collado-Lázaro, Aitor Gamarra-Calavia, C. Balsalobre-Fernández","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this work is to analyze the reliability and validity of the new inertial measurement unit (IMU) PUSHTM Band 2.0 to measure barbell velocity. Six healthy males (24.83±3.71years; 69.88±8.36kg; 175.92±4.5cm) participated in this study and performed several sets on the bench press. Barbell concentric mean (MV) and peak (PV) velocity were recorded with a LT and the IMU. Pearson correlation coefficient shows a very high relationship for MV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.08 m/s; 95%CI: 0.95-0.98; p< 0.001) and PV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.13 m/s; 95%CI: 0.96-0.98; p< 0.001). There was a very high agreement for the values of MV and PV (MV: ICC = 0.945, CI = 0.834–0.974, α = 0.981; PV: ICC = 0.926, CI = 0.708–0.969, α = 0.977). Paired sample t-test revealed systematic bias for MV (p< 0.001; mean difference between instruments = 0.06 ± 0.09 m/s) and PV (p< 0.001; mean difference between instruments = 0.15 ± 0.18 m/s). Bland-Altman plots showed almost trivial and moderate relationships for MV (r2 = 0.1) and PV (r2 = 0.37). In conclusion, the PUSHTM Band 2.0 was proven to be a valid alternative for measuring barbell velocity in the bench press.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of a novel inertial measurement unit to track barbell velocity\",\"authors\":\"D. Varela-Olalla, Darío Álvarez-Salvador, Alejandro Arias-Tomé, Ignacio Collado-Lázaro, Aitor Gamarra-Calavia, C. Balsalobre-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this work is to analyze the reliability and validity of the new inertial measurement unit (IMU) PUSHTM Band 2.0 to measure barbell velocity. Six healthy males (24.83±3.71years; 69.88±8.36kg; 175.92±4.5cm) participated in this study and performed several sets on the bench press. Barbell concentric mean (MV) and peak (PV) velocity were recorded with a LT and the IMU. Pearson correlation coefficient shows a very high relationship for MV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.08 m/s; 95%CI: 0.95-0.98; p< 0.001) and PV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.13 m/s; 95%CI: 0.96-0.98; p< 0.001). There was a very high agreement for the values of MV and PV (MV: ICC = 0.945, CI = 0.834–0.974, α = 0.981; PV: ICC = 0.926, CI = 0.708–0.969, α = 0.977). Paired sample t-test revealed systematic bias for MV (p< 0.001; mean difference between instruments = 0.06 ± 0.09 m/s) and PV (p< 0.001; mean difference between instruments = 0.15 ± 0.18 m/s). Bland-Altman plots showed almost trivial and moderate relationships for MV (r2 = 0.1) and PV (r2 = 0.37). In conclusion, the PUSHTM Band 2.0 was proven to be a valid alternative for measuring barbell velocity in the bench press.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本工作的目的是分析新型惯性测量单元PUSHTM Band 2.0测量杠铃速度的可靠性和有效性。6名健康男性(24.83±3.71岁;69.88±8.36kg;175.92±4.5cm)参加了这项研究,并在卧推上进行了几组。用LT和IMU记录Barbell同心平均值(MV)和峰值(PV)速度。Pearson相关系数显示MV(r=0.97;SEE:0.08 m/s;95%CI:0.95-0.98;p<0.001)和PV(r=0.95;SEE:0.13 m/s;95%CI:0.96-0.98;p<0.001)的相关性非常高。MV和PV的值非常一致(MV:ICC=0.945,CI=0.834–0.974,α=0.981;PV:ICC=0.9 26,CI=0.708–0.969,α=0.9 77)。配对样本t检验显示MV的系统偏差(p<0.001;仪器之间的平均差=0.06±0.09 m/s)和PV(p<001;仪器之间平均差=0.15±0.18 m/s)。Bland-Altman图显示MV(r2=0.1)和PV(r2=0.37)之间几乎是琐碎和适度的关系。总之,PUSHTM Band 2.0被证明是测量台式压力机杠铃速度的有效替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity of a novel inertial measurement unit to track barbell velocity
The objective of this work is to analyze the reliability and validity of the new inertial measurement unit (IMU) PUSHTM Band 2.0 to measure barbell velocity. Six healthy males (24.83±3.71years; 69.88±8.36kg; 175.92±4.5cm) participated in this study and performed several sets on the bench press. Barbell concentric mean (MV) and peak (PV) velocity were recorded with a LT and the IMU. Pearson correlation coefficient shows a very high relationship for MV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.08 m/s; 95%CI: 0.95-0.98; p< 0.001) and PV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.13 m/s; 95%CI: 0.96-0.98; p< 0.001). There was a very high agreement for the values of MV and PV (MV: ICC = 0.945, CI = 0.834–0.974, α = 0.981; PV: ICC = 0.926, CI = 0.708–0.969, α = 0.977). Paired sample t-test revealed systematic bias for MV (p< 0.001; mean difference between instruments = 0.06 ± 0.09 m/s) and PV (p< 0.001; mean difference between instruments = 0.15 ± 0.18 m/s). Bland-Altman plots showed almost trivial and moderate relationships for MV (r2 = 0.1) and PV (r2 = 0.37). In conclusion, the PUSHTM Band 2.0 was proven to be a valid alternative for measuring barbell velocity in the bench press.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of maximal oxygen uptake pre- and post-COVID-19 in elite footballers in Argentina A systematic review on the application of Aikido as a psychosomatic tool in therapeutic setting (Part I) The pre-participation physical evaluation: fact or fiction? Adductor functionality and strength in high-level rink hockey players Hemodynamic and motion demands of soccer referees: a comparison between series A and B of the State Championship of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1