{"title":"金融民主是什么样子的超越金融科技和regtech的思考","authors":"Eric White","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2023.2204777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n The paper addresses the purported ‘democratisation’ of finance as it has been heralded among many proponents of decentralized finance (‘DeFi’). It places the emergence of decentralised platform financing in the context of a continuing neo-liberalization of public services to interrogate the democratisation claim. Following a brief presentation of the guiding principles for both Canadian and U.S. securities regulation law, the paper explains the fast evolution of DeFi and argues that its driving impetus is the inclusion of individuals into a financial system that features little centralisation and even less regulatory oversight. While access to online investment forms is broadened, it remains questionable to which degree such a system can be an instrument in the pursuit of long-term oriented public goods goals.","PeriodicalId":37728,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Legal Theory","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does finance democracy look like?: thinking beyond fintech and regtech\",\"authors\":\"Eric White\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20414005.2023.2204777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n The paper addresses the purported ‘democratisation’ of finance as it has been heralded among many proponents of decentralized finance (‘DeFi’). It places the emergence of decentralised platform financing in the context of a continuing neo-liberalization of public services to interrogate the democratisation claim. Following a brief presentation of the guiding principles for both Canadian and U.S. securities regulation law, the paper explains the fast evolution of DeFi and argues that its driving impetus is the inclusion of individuals into a financial system that features little centralisation and even less regulatory oversight. While access to online investment forms is broadened, it remains questionable to which degree such a system can be an instrument in the pursuit of long-term oriented public goods goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2204777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2204777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
What does finance democracy look like?: thinking beyond fintech and regtech
ABSTRACT
The paper addresses the purported ‘democratisation’ of finance as it has been heralded among many proponents of decentralized finance (‘DeFi’). It places the emergence of decentralised platform financing in the context of a continuing neo-liberalization of public services to interrogate the democratisation claim. Following a brief presentation of the guiding principles for both Canadian and U.S. securities regulation law, the paper explains the fast evolution of DeFi and argues that its driving impetus is the inclusion of individuals into a financial system that features little centralisation and even less regulatory oversight. While access to online investment forms is broadened, it remains questionable to which degree such a system can be an instrument in the pursuit of long-term oriented public goods goals.
期刊介绍:
The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.