本质主义会导致种族偏见吗?事情并不是那么非黑即白。

2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Advances in Child Development and Behavior Pub Date : 2020-05-21 DOI:10.31234/osf.io/zkqrx
T. Mandalaywala
{"title":"本质主义会导致种族偏见吗?事情并不是那么非黑即白。","authors":"T. Mandalaywala","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/zkqrx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over half a century ago, psychologists hypothesized that social essentialism, an intuitive theory comprising the beliefs that social categories reflect naturally occurring distinctions and that category members share an underlying and fundamental essence, lays the foundation for prejudice. In the intervening decades, research has shown that although essentialism sometimes leads to prejudicial beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, it does not always, sometimes even leading to decreased prejudice toward stigmatized groups. The relation between essentialism and prejudice is clearly complex, but this review proposes four questions that will help clarify how and when essentialism leads to prejudice: (1) What precisely is essentialism and how might a more nuanced understanding of its components and structure shed light on the mechanisms by which essentialist beliefs contribute to prejudice?; (2) Do essentialist beliefs orient group-based prejudice toward out-groups or toward stigmatized groups, and what are the consequences of essentialist beliefs among those with minoritized identities?; (3) Do essentialist beliefs engender group-based prejudice directly, or must essentialist beliefs interact with additional information or belief systems to lead to negative consequences?; and (4) Do essentialist beliefs lay a foundation for group-based prejudice to develop, or is essentialism strategically invoked to justify existing prejudice? By posing these questions, describing what is currently known about each, and proposing future lines of inquiry that focus on the importance of including participants from a diverse set of backgrounds and across developmental periods, this review aims to stimulate research studies best designed to fill the gaps in our knowledge. By understanding how and when essentialism contributes to prejudice, we will be better equipped to use this early-emerging, but malleable, aspect of cognition to decrease prejudice and create a more equitable society.","PeriodicalId":47214,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Child Development and Behavior","volume":"59 1","pages":"195-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does essentialism lead to racial prejudice? It is not so Black and White.\",\"authors\":\"T. Mandalaywala\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/zkqrx\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over half a century ago, psychologists hypothesized that social essentialism, an intuitive theory comprising the beliefs that social categories reflect naturally occurring distinctions and that category members share an underlying and fundamental essence, lays the foundation for prejudice. In the intervening decades, research has shown that although essentialism sometimes leads to prejudicial beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, it does not always, sometimes even leading to decreased prejudice toward stigmatized groups. The relation between essentialism and prejudice is clearly complex, but this review proposes four questions that will help clarify how and when essentialism leads to prejudice: (1) What precisely is essentialism and how might a more nuanced understanding of its components and structure shed light on the mechanisms by which essentialist beliefs contribute to prejudice?; (2) Do essentialist beliefs orient group-based prejudice toward out-groups or toward stigmatized groups, and what are the consequences of essentialist beliefs among those with minoritized identities?; (3) Do essentialist beliefs engender group-based prejudice directly, or must essentialist beliefs interact with additional information or belief systems to lead to negative consequences?; and (4) Do essentialist beliefs lay a foundation for group-based prejudice to develop, or is essentialism strategically invoked to justify existing prejudice? By posing these questions, describing what is currently known about each, and proposing future lines of inquiry that focus on the importance of including participants from a diverse set of backgrounds and across developmental periods, this review aims to stimulate research studies best designed to fill the gaps in our knowledge. By understanding how and when essentialism contributes to prejudice, we will be better equipped to use this early-emerging, but malleable, aspect of cognition to decrease prejudice and create a more equitable society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Child Development and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"195-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Child Development and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zkqrx\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Child Development and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zkqrx","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

半个多世纪以前,心理学家假设社会本质主义为偏见奠定了基础。社会本质主义是一种直觉理论,包括社会类别反映自然发生的差异,类别成员共享潜在的基本本质的信念。在这期间的几十年里,研究表明,虽然本质主义有时会导致偏见的信仰、态度和行为,但它并不总是如此,有时甚至会导致对污名化群体的偏见减少。本质主义和偏见之间的关系显然是复杂的,但这篇综述提出了四个问题,将有助于澄清本质主义是如何以及何时导致偏见的:(1)本质主义到底是什么,以及对其组成和结构的更细致的理解如何揭示本质主义信仰导致偏见的机制?(2)本质主义信仰是否引导了群体对外群体或被污名化群体的偏见,本质主义信仰对具有少数身份的群体有什么影响?(3)本质主义信仰是否直接产生基于群体的偏见,或者本质主义信仰必须与额外的信息或信仰系统相互作用才能导致负面后果?(4)本质主义信仰是否为群体偏见的发展奠定了基础,还是本质主义在战略上被用来为现有偏见辩护?通过提出这些问题,描述目前对每个问题的了解,并提出未来的调查路线,重点关注包括来自不同背景和不同发展时期的参与者的重要性,本综述旨在刺激研究,以最好地填补我们的知识空白。通过了解本质主义如何以及何时导致偏见,我们将更好地利用这一早期出现但具有可塑性的认知方面来减少偏见,创造一个更公平的社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does essentialism lead to racial prejudice? It is not so Black and White.
Over half a century ago, psychologists hypothesized that social essentialism, an intuitive theory comprising the beliefs that social categories reflect naturally occurring distinctions and that category members share an underlying and fundamental essence, lays the foundation for prejudice. In the intervening decades, research has shown that although essentialism sometimes leads to prejudicial beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, it does not always, sometimes even leading to decreased prejudice toward stigmatized groups. The relation between essentialism and prejudice is clearly complex, but this review proposes four questions that will help clarify how and when essentialism leads to prejudice: (1) What precisely is essentialism and how might a more nuanced understanding of its components and structure shed light on the mechanisms by which essentialist beliefs contribute to prejudice?; (2) Do essentialist beliefs orient group-based prejudice toward out-groups or toward stigmatized groups, and what are the consequences of essentialist beliefs among those with minoritized identities?; (3) Do essentialist beliefs engender group-based prejudice directly, or must essentialist beliefs interact with additional information or belief systems to lead to negative consequences?; and (4) Do essentialist beliefs lay a foundation for group-based prejudice to develop, or is essentialism strategically invoked to justify existing prejudice? By posing these questions, describing what is currently known about each, and proposing future lines of inquiry that focus on the importance of including participants from a diverse set of backgrounds and across developmental periods, this review aims to stimulate research studies best designed to fill the gaps in our knowledge. By understanding how and when essentialism contributes to prejudice, we will be better equipped to use this early-emerging, but malleable, aspect of cognition to decrease prejudice and create a more equitable society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Child Development and Behavior
Advances in Child Development and Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Putting the child in the driver's seat: Insights into language development from children's interactions in preschool classrooms. Stop trying to carve Nature at its joints! The importance of a process-based developmental science for understanding neurodiversity. The operationalization of coordinated attention and the relations to language development: A meta-analysis. Word learning is hands-on: Insights from studying natural behavior. Daylong egocentric recordings in small- and large-scale language communities: A practical introduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1