压力和自信推动对在线零售产品购买和退货的影响:来自随机场实验的证据

IF 5.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Research Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1177/00222437231180494
A. Ghose, Heeseung Andrew Lee, Ki-Eun Nam, Wonseok Oh
{"title":"压力和自信推动对在线零售产品购买和退货的影响:来自随机场实验的证据","authors":"A. Ghose, Heeseung Andrew Lee, Ki-Eun Nam, Wonseok Oh","doi":"10.1177/00222437231180494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through a randomized field experiment, this study compared the economic effects of two categories of nudges—self-assurance- and pressure-based interventions—on consumers’ purchase and return behaviors. In contrast to pressure-oriented nudges, such as quantity scarcity, time scarcity, and social persuasion, self-assurance nudges are intended to facilitate the “light” validation of product choice and characteristics of style or size and the self-assurance-grounded justification of purchase during shopping. The findings revealed that self-assurance nudges designed to help consumers make better choices have both short-term (high sales) and long-term (few product returns) benefits. Although pressure-driven nudges offer slightly higher short-term benefits (high sales), they eventually engender unfavorable long-term outcomes (high product returns) for consumers and online retailers. Finally, under return-adjusted net sales as performance measures, self-assurance-based nudges are as effective in stimulating purchase as those that capitalize on scarcity and social pressure.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: The Effects of Pressure and Self-Assurance Nudges on Product Purchases and Returns in Online Retailing: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment\",\"authors\":\"A. Ghose, Heeseung Andrew Lee, Ki-Eun Nam, Wonseok Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222437231180494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through a randomized field experiment, this study compared the economic effects of two categories of nudges—self-assurance- and pressure-based interventions—on consumers’ purchase and return behaviors. In contrast to pressure-oriented nudges, such as quantity scarcity, time scarcity, and social persuasion, self-assurance nudges are intended to facilitate the “light” validation of product choice and characteristics of style or size and the self-assurance-grounded justification of purchase during shopping. The findings revealed that self-assurance nudges designed to help consumers make better choices have both short-term (high sales) and long-term (few product returns) benefits. Although pressure-driven nudges offer slightly higher short-term benefits (high sales), they eventually engender unfavorable long-term outcomes (high product returns) for consumers and online retailers. Finally, under return-adjusted net sales as performance measures, self-assurance-based nudges are as effective in stimulating purchase as those that capitalize on scarcity and social pressure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231180494\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231180494","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过随机现场实验,本研究比较了两类推动——自信和基于压力的干预——对消费者购买和退货行为的经济影响。与数量稀缺、时间稀缺和社会说服等压力导向的推动相反,自信推动旨在促进对产品选择和风格或尺寸特征的“轻”验证,以及在购物过程中以自信为基础的购买理由。研究结果显示,旨在帮助消费者做出更好选择的自信推动既有短期(高销售额)效益,也有长期(产品退货率低)效益。尽管压力驱动的推动会带来稍高的短期收益(高销售额),但最终会给消费者和在线零售商带来不利的长期结果(高产品回报率)。最后,在将回报调整后的净销售额作为业绩衡量标准的情况下,基于自信的推动在刺激购买方面与利用稀缺和社会压力的推动同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: The Effects of Pressure and Self-Assurance Nudges on Product Purchases and Returns in Online Retailing: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
Through a randomized field experiment, this study compared the economic effects of two categories of nudges—self-assurance- and pressure-based interventions—on consumers’ purchase and return behaviors. In contrast to pressure-oriented nudges, such as quantity scarcity, time scarcity, and social persuasion, self-assurance nudges are intended to facilitate the “light” validation of product choice and characteristics of style or size and the self-assurance-grounded justification of purchase during shopping. The findings revealed that self-assurance nudges designed to help consumers make better choices have both short-term (high sales) and long-term (few product returns) benefits. Although pressure-driven nudges offer slightly higher short-term benefits (high sales), they eventually engender unfavorable long-term outcomes (high product returns) for consumers and online retailers. Finally, under return-adjusted net sales as performance measures, self-assurance-based nudges are as effective in stimulating purchase as those that capitalize on scarcity and social pressure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories EXPRESS: Monitoring Technologies in Industrial Systems EXPRESS: How Listening versus Reading Alters Consumers’ Interpretations of News EXPRESS: The Closing-the-Gap Effect: Joint Evaluation Leads Donors to Help Charities Farther from Their Goal EXPRESS: Zooming in on the Very Early Days: The Role of Trademark Applications in the Acquisition of Venture Capital Seed Funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1