锥形束CT在混合手术室中作为术后CT的替代方案用于椎弓根螺钉断裂检测

S. Peh, J. Pfarr, J. Schäfer, J. Christensen, A. Chatterjea, R. Nachabe, A. Seekamp, S. Lippross
{"title":"锥形束CT在混合手术室中作为术后CT的替代方案用于椎弓根螺钉断裂检测","authors":"S. Peh, J. Pfarr, J. Schäfer, J. Christensen, A. Chatterjea, R. Nachabe, A. Seekamp, S. Lippross","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-256928/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background\n\nCT is considered the gold standard for detecting pedicle breach. However, CBCT may be a viable and low radiation dose alternative, to provide intraoperative feedback to surgeons to permit in-room revisions of misplaced screws\nMethods\n\nTo assess the ability and reliability of intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) from a robotic C-arm in a hybrid operating room (OR) two hundred forty-one pedicle screws were inserted in cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine of 7 cadavers, followed by CBCT and CT imaging. The CT images served as the standard of reference. Agreement on screw placement between both imaging systems was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (κ). Sensitivity, Specificity, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the empirical and fitted ROC curves (AUC) were computed to assess CBCT as a diagnostic tool compared to CT. The patient effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated for comparison. A systematic literature review was performed to provide perspective to the obtained results.\nResults\n\nAlmost perfect agreement in assessing pedicle screw grading between CBCT and CT was observed (κ = 0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of CBCT were 0.84 and 0.98, respectively. The AUC derived from the empirical and fitted ROC curves were 0.95 and 0.96, respectively.\nConclusion\n\nIntraoperative CBCT by C-arm in a hybrid OR is highly reliable in identification of screw placement at significant dose reduction.","PeriodicalId":73951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine research and surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative cone beam CT in hybrid operating room set-up as an alternative to postoperative CT for pedicle screw breach detection\",\"authors\":\"S. Peh, J. Pfarr, J. Schäfer, J. Christensen, A. Chatterjea, R. Nachabe, A. Seekamp, S. Lippross\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/RS.3.RS-256928/V1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background\\n\\nCT is considered the gold standard for detecting pedicle breach. However, CBCT may be a viable and low radiation dose alternative, to provide intraoperative feedback to surgeons to permit in-room revisions of misplaced screws\\nMethods\\n\\nTo assess the ability and reliability of intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) from a robotic C-arm in a hybrid operating room (OR) two hundred forty-one pedicle screws were inserted in cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine of 7 cadavers, followed by CBCT and CT imaging. The CT images served as the standard of reference. Agreement on screw placement between both imaging systems was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (κ). Sensitivity, Specificity, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the empirical and fitted ROC curves (AUC) were computed to assess CBCT as a diagnostic tool compared to CT. The patient effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated for comparison. A systematic literature review was performed to provide perspective to the obtained results.\\nResults\\n\\nAlmost perfect agreement in assessing pedicle screw grading between CBCT and CT was observed (κ = 0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of CBCT were 0.84 and 0.98, respectively. The AUC derived from the empirical and fitted ROC curves were 0.95 and 0.96, respectively.\\nConclusion\\n\\nIntraoperative CBCT by C-arm in a hybrid OR is highly reliable in identification of screw placement at significant dose reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine research and surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine research and surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-256928/V1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine research and surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-256928/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

ct被认为是检测椎弓根断裂的金标准。然而,CBCT可能是一种可行的低辐射剂量替代方案,可以为外科医生提供术中反馈,从而允许在室内修改错位螺钉。方法为了评估混合手术室(OR)中机器人c臂锥束CT (CBCT)的能力和可靠性,我们在7具尸体的颈、胸、腰椎置入241枚椎弓根螺钉,然后进行CBCT和CT成像。CT图像作为参考标准。采用Cohen’s Kappa系数(κ)评估两种成像系统间螺钉放置的一致性。计算灵敏度、特异性、受试者工作特征(ROC)、经验曲线下面积和拟合ROC曲线(AUC),以评估CBCT与CT相比作为诊断工具的价值。计算患者有效辐射剂量(ED)进行比较。进行了系统的文献综述,以提供对所得结果的看法。结果CBCT与CT对椎弓根螺钉分级的评价基本一致(κ = 0.84)。CBCT的敏感性和特异性分别为0.84和0.98。经验曲线和拟合ROC曲线的AUC分别为0.95和0.96。结论混合手术室术中c臂CBCT对明显减剂量螺钉置入的识别是高度可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative cone beam CT in hybrid operating room set-up as an alternative to postoperative CT for pedicle screw breach detection
Background CT is considered the gold standard for detecting pedicle breach. However, CBCT may be a viable and low radiation dose alternative, to provide intraoperative feedback to surgeons to permit in-room revisions of misplaced screws Methods To assess the ability and reliability of intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) from a robotic C-arm in a hybrid operating room (OR) two hundred forty-one pedicle screws were inserted in cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine of 7 cadavers, followed by CBCT and CT imaging. The CT images served as the standard of reference. Agreement on screw placement between both imaging systems was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (κ). Sensitivity, Specificity, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the empirical and fitted ROC curves (AUC) were computed to assess CBCT as a diagnostic tool compared to CT. The patient effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated for comparison. A systematic literature review was performed to provide perspective to the obtained results. Results Almost perfect agreement in assessing pedicle screw grading between CBCT and CT was observed (κ = 0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of CBCT were 0.84 and 0.98, respectively. The AUC derived from the empirical and fitted ROC curves were 0.95 and 0.96, respectively. Conclusion Intraoperative CBCT by C-arm in a hybrid OR is highly reliable in identification of screw placement at significant dose reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modification of the Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Efficacy for Reducing Major Cardiometabolic Risks, Increased Fitness, and Improved Health-Related Quality of Life. The Decline of Lumbar Artificial Disc Replacement. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Opportunities and Challenges. Mechanobiology of MicroRNAs in Intervertebral Disk Degeneration. Long-Term Outcomes of the Spinal Cord Injury Assessing Tolerability and Use of Combine Rehabilitation and NeuroAID (SATURN STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1