课程非殖民化:古代欧洲人是谁?

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Journal of Black Studies Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1177/00219347221120283
Marie Charles, B. Boyle
{"title":"课程非殖民化:古代欧洲人是谁?","authors":"Marie Charles, B. Boyle","doi":"10.1177/00219347221120283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current international decolonizing debate is floundering. Despite well intentioned optimism that the debate would lead to an interrogation of the current schooling system and deepen the taught curriculum beyond “Black history month” and the slave trade, this is not happening. “They (power structure/policy makers) don’t want you to study ancient history because they want you to study slavery and colonialism to lock down your first frequency. The deeper they dig the blacker the planet.”. The two focal points of this paper to address this theme are inter-related and analyze interpretations of the phrase “decolonizing the curriculum.” They are, firstly, the European (white1) socially engineered paradigm which still dominates global education conceptualization, curriculum content, and teaching and learning models, and secondly, evidence of the natural migrations of Melanated populations out of Africa into Europe, including the United Kingdom. The paper draws upon the author’s research of ancient material culture to provide the primordial evidence of advanced geometry in the British Isles, supported by Mazama’s concept of a paradigm, its function, and change in worldview.","PeriodicalId":47356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Black Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonizing the Curriculum: Who Were the Ancient Europeans?\",\"authors\":\"Marie Charles, B. Boyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00219347221120283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current international decolonizing debate is floundering. Despite well intentioned optimism that the debate would lead to an interrogation of the current schooling system and deepen the taught curriculum beyond “Black history month” and the slave trade, this is not happening. “They (power structure/policy makers) don’t want you to study ancient history because they want you to study slavery and colonialism to lock down your first frequency. The deeper they dig the blacker the planet.”. The two focal points of this paper to address this theme are inter-related and analyze interpretations of the phrase “decolonizing the curriculum.” They are, firstly, the European (white1) socially engineered paradigm which still dominates global education conceptualization, curriculum content, and teaching and learning models, and secondly, evidence of the natural migrations of Melanated populations out of Africa into Europe, including the United Kingdom. The paper draws upon the author’s research of ancient material culture to provide the primordial evidence of advanced geometry in the British Isles, supported by Mazama’s concept of a paradigm, its function, and change in worldview.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Black Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Black Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00219347221120283\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Black Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00219347221120283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前国际上关于非殖民化的辩论举步维艰。尽管人们出于善意乐观地认为,这场辩论将导致对当前教育体系的质疑,并深化“黑人历史月”和奴隶贸易以外的教学课程,但这并没有发生。“他们(权力结构/政策制定者)不希望你学习古代历史,因为他们希望你研究奴隶制和殖民主义,以锁定你的第一频率。他们挖得越深,地球就越黑。”本文讨论这一主题的两个焦点是相互关联的,并分析了对“非殖民化课程”一词的解释。首先,它们是欧洲(白色)社会工程范式,它仍然主导着全球教育的概念化、课程内容和教学模式;其次,它们是黑化人口从非洲自然迁移到欧洲(包括英国)的证据。本文借鉴了作者对古代物质文化的研究,以Mazama的范式概念、范式的功能和世界观的变化为基础,提供了不列颠群岛先进几何的原始证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decolonizing the Curriculum: Who Were the Ancient Europeans?
The current international decolonizing debate is floundering. Despite well intentioned optimism that the debate would lead to an interrogation of the current schooling system and deepen the taught curriculum beyond “Black history month” and the slave trade, this is not happening. “They (power structure/policy makers) don’t want you to study ancient history because they want you to study slavery and colonialism to lock down your first frequency. The deeper they dig the blacker the planet.”. The two focal points of this paper to address this theme are inter-related and analyze interpretations of the phrase “decolonizing the curriculum.” They are, firstly, the European (white1) socially engineered paradigm which still dominates global education conceptualization, curriculum content, and teaching and learning models, and secondly, evidence of the natural migrations of Melanated populations out of Africa into Europe, including the United Kingdom. The paper draws upon the author’s research of ancient material culture to provide the primordial evidence of advanced geometry in the British Isles, supported by Mazama’s concept of a paradigm, its function, and change in worldview.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: For the last quarter of a century, the Journal of Black Studies has been the leading source for dynamic, innovative, and creative approach on the Black experience. Poised to remain at the forefront of the recent explosive growth in quality scholarship in the field of Black studies, the Journal of Black Studies is now published six times per year. This means a greater number of important and intellectually provocative articles exploring key issues facing African Americans and Blacks can now be given voice. The scholarship inside JBS covers a wide range of subject areas, including: society, social issues, Afrocentricity, economics, culture, media, literature, language, heritage, and biology.
期刊最新文献
Calling on Hope: Examining the Protective Nature of Hope on Mental Health Risk Factors in Black Women The Race-Gender-Equity-Leadership Matrix: Intersectionality and Its Application in Higher Education Literature Black Woman Victimhood: An Intersectional Analysis of Meg Thee Stallion’s Testimony Coloniality of Democracy and Algocracy in Africa: Vanhucracy as an Afrocentric Model for Politics Black Measurement: The Contributions of People Racialized as Black to the Field of Psychometrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1