探索行动研究作为一种创造证据的方法,根据原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的存在、行为和认识方式

Q2 Social Sciences Evaluation Journal of Australasia Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.1177/1035719x231182433
Lucas Moore, Reno French
{"title":"探索行动研究作为一种创造证据的方法,根据原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的存在、行为和认识方式","authors":"Lucas Moore, Reno French","doi":"10.1177/1035719x231182433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades there has been growing acknowledgement of the need to decolonise approaches to evaluation policy, programs and services impacting on the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Action research methodologies have been identified as the most appropriate approach ( Evans et al., 2014 ). This article outlines how a community controlled peak body is utilising an action research approach guided by First Nations wisdom and knowledge to drive evaluation. Examination of two action research projects undertaken by Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Protection Peak (QATSICPP) demonstrate how action research embodies the principles of self-determination and Indigenous Data Sovereignty in evaluative processes. The article also highlights how evaluative evidence informs new approaches to address the overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in child protection. Project reflections suggest participants found the action research approach inclusive, participatory, and effective in assisting them to address critical practice and systemic issues. The importance of ensuring evaluative methodologies are meaningful for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people was also highlighted.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring action research as a method of creating evidence that is informed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of being, doing and knowing\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Moore, Reno French\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1035719x231182433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past two decades there has been growing acknowledgement of the need to decolonise approaches to evaluation policy, programs and services impacting on the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Action research methodologies have been identified as the most appropriate approach ( Evans et al., 2014 ). This article outlines how a community controlled peak body is utilising an action research approach guided by First Nations wisdom and knowledge to drive evaluation. Examination of two action research projects undertaken by Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Protection Peak (QATSICPP) demonstrate how action research embodies the principles of self-determination and Indigenous Data Sovereignty in evaluative processes. The article also highlights how evaluative evidence informs new approaches to address the overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in child protection. Project reflections suggest participants found the action research approach inclusive, participatory, and effective in assisting them to address critical practice and systemic issues. The importance of ensuring evaluative methodologies are meaningful for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people was also highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x231182433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x231182433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年里,人们越来越认识到,有必要对影响原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民生活的评估政策、方案和服务采取非殖民化方法。行动研究方法已被确定为最合适的方法(Evans等人,2014)。本文概述了一个由社区控制的高峰机构如何利用以原住民智慧和知识为指导的行动研究方法来推动评估。对昆士兰原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童保护高峰组织开展的两个行动研究项目的审查表明,行动研究如何在评估过程中体现自决和土著数据主权的原则。这篇文章还强调了评估证据如何为解决土著和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童在儿童保护中比例过高的问题提供新的方法。项目反思表明,参与者发现行动研究方法具有包容性、参与性和有效性,有助于他们解决关键实践和系统性问题。还强调了确保评价方法对土著和托雷斯海峡岛民有意义的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring action research as a method of creating evidence that is informed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of being, doing and knowing
Over the past two decades there has been growing acknowledgement of the need to decolonise approaches to evaluation policy, programs and services impacting on the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Action research methodologies have been identified as the most appropriate approach ( Evans et al., 2014 ). This article outlines how a community controlled peak body is utilising an action research approach guided by First Nations wisdom and knowledge to drive evaluation. Examination of two action research projects undertaken by Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Protection Peak (QATSICPP) demonstrate how action research embodies the principles of self-determination and Indigenous Data Sovereignty in evaluative processes. The article also highlights how evaluative evidence informs new approaches to address the overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in child protection. Project reflections suggest participants found the action research approach inclusive, participatory, and effective in assisting them to address critical practice and systemic issues. The importance of ensuring evaluative methodologies are meaningful for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people was also highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework Evaluation at the cutting edge: Driving innovation and quality The best medicine: Lessons from health for policy randomistas Evaluator perspective: Meet an Australian Evaluation Society Fellow – Nan Wehipeihana Meta-evaluation: Validating program evaluation standards through the United Nations Evaluation Quality Assessment (EQAs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1