纵隔穿刺抢救一例:恐惧大于伤害

Narindra N. M. Raza manjato, Andriamanantsialonina Andrianony, A. Rabemazava, H. Rakotovao
{"title":"纵隔穿刺抢救一例:恐惧大于伤害","authors":"Narindra N. M. Raza manjato, Andriamanantsialonina Andrianony, A. Rabemazava, H. Rakotovao","doi":"10.21037/JECCM-20-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Mediastinal impalement by a sharp object is both an extraordinary and fortunately exceptional situation. The cases are infrequently encountered and rarely report in literature because the majority of these patients die in pre-hospital care. In the literature, only a few cases have been published to date. A review of the literature reveals that most patients with mediastinal impalement do not survive or have an unpredictable injury pattern. In this presentation, the authors report a strange case of attempted homicide in the context of family vindictiveness with a sharp knife of a 58-year-old woman was reported. The surgical exploration was chosen, allowing good exposure of the object but no visceral or vascular lesions were observed. The marking hazard we encountered with this observation was that the innominate artery passed through the hole in the tail of the knife, which was already broken at the lower edge without causing any damage to the vessel. Perioperative management may involve multiple surgeons performing simultaneous surgical procedures. The removal of the intra-mediastinal knife is a delicate process that requires a careful etiopathogenic analysis of the victim and the intrathoracic impaled object to prevent other damages to the patient. The authors describe an unexpected non-fatal of penetrating intra-mediastinal injury and via a literature review, the tricks and tips of surgical management are discussed in a stable patient.","PeriodicalId":73727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case report of rescue in extremis of mediastinal impalement: more fear than harm\",\"authors\":\"Narindra N. M. Raza manjato, Andriamanantsialonina Andrianony, A. Rabemazava, H. Rakotovao\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/JECCM-20-116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Mediastinal impalement by a sharp object is both an extraordinary and fortunately exceptional situation. The cases are infrequently encountered and rarely report in literature because the majority of these patients die in pre-hospital care. In the literature, only a few cases have been published to date. A review of the literature reveals that most patients with mediastinal impalement do not survive or have an unpredictable injury pattern. In this presentation, the authors report a strange case of attempted homicide in the context of family vindictiveness with a sharp knife of a 58-year-old woman was reported. The surgical exploration was chosen, allowing good exposure of the object but no visceral or vascular lesions were observed. The marking hazard we encountered with this observation was that the innominate artery passed through the hole in the tail of the knife, which was already broken at the lower edge without causing any damage to the vessel. Perioperative management may involve multiple surgeons performing simultaneous surgical procedures. The removal of the intra-mediastinal knife is a delicate process that requires a careful etiopathogenic analysis of the victim and the intrathoracic impaled object to prevent other damages to the patient. The authors describe an unexpected non-fatal of penetrating intra-mediastinal injury and via a literature review, the tricks and tips of surgical management are discussed in a stable patient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/JECCM-20-116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JECCM-20-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纵隔被尖锐物体刺穿是一种非常罕见的情况。这些病例很少遇到,也很少在文献中报道,因为大多数患者死于院前护理。在文献中,迄今为止只有少数病例被发表。文献回顾显示,大多数纵隔穿刺患者不能存活或有不可预测的损伤模式。在本报告中,作者报告了一起奇怪的谋杀未遂案件,在家庭报复的背景下,用一把锋利的刀杀害了一名58岁的妇女。选择手术探查,可以很好地暴露物体,但没有观察到内脏或血管病变。我们在这个观察中遇到的标记危险是,无名动脉穿过刀尾的洞,而刀尾的下缘已经断裂,但没有对血管造成任何损害。围手术期管理可能涉及多名外科医生同时进行手术。取出纵隔内刀是一个精细的过程,需要对受害者和胸腔内刺穿的物体进行仔细的病因分析,以防止对患者造成其他伤害。作者描述了一个意外的非致命性穿透纵隔损伤,并通过文献回顾,技巧和技巧的手术管理讨论在一个稳定的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A case report of rescue in extremis of mediastinal impalement: more fear than harm
: Mediastinal impalement by a sharp object is both an extraordinary and fortunately exceptional situation. The cases are infrequently encountered and rarely report in literature because the majority of these patients die in pre-hospital care. In the literature, only a few cases have been published to date. A review of the literature reveals that most patients with mediastinal impalement do not survive or have an unpredictable injury pattern. In this presentation, the authors report a strange case of attempted homicide in the context of family vindictiveness with a sharp knife of a 58-year-old woman was reported. The surgical exploration was chosen, allowing good exposure of the object but no visceral or vascular lesions were observed. The marking hazard we encountered with this observation was that the innominate artery passed through the hole in the tail of the knife, which was already broken at the lower edge without causing any damage to the vessel. Perioperative management may involve multiple surgeons performing simultaneous surgical procedures. The removal of the intra-mediastinal knife is a delicate process that requires a careful etiopathogenic analysis of the victim and the intrathoracic impaled object to prevent other damages to the patient. The authors describe an unexpected non-fatal of penetrating intra-mediastinal injury and via a literature review, the tricks and tips of surgical management are discussed in a stable patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal management of mobile cabin hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from Shanghai, China A case series of Slow continuous ultrafiltration for COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus with palivizumab in an adult liver transplant recipient: a case report Pituitary apoplexy mimicking stroke and myocardial infarction: a case report Diagnosis, management and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1