学术交流系统中的“裂缝”：来自早期职业研究人员的纵向国际研究的见解

IF 2.4 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1002/leap.1539

David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Galina Serbina, David Sims, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard

{"title":"学术交流系统中的“裂缝”：来自早期职业研究人员的纵向国际研究的见解","authors":"David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Galina Serbina, David Sims, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard","doi":"10.1002/leap.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.</li>\n \n <li>The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.</li>\n \n <li>The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"36 2","pages":"319-322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers\",\"authors\":\"David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Galina Serbina, David Sims, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.1539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.</li>\\n \\n <li>The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.</li>\\n \\n <li>The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"319-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

170名早期职业研究人员在两年多的时间里接受了三次采访，他们对学术交流的压力测试做出了独特的贡献，并发现了裂缝。千禧一代价值观的融合和大流行造成的完美风暴似乎加速了破解过程，也许是为了好。有问题的漏洞是:(1)同行评议;(2)声誉评价;(3)不道德/有问题的行为;(4)协作;(5)网络。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers

170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.
The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.
The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

17.90%

发文量