不完全属于:英国计划的不确定的欧洲联系

IF 0.8 3区 历史学 0 ARCHITECTURE Planning Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1080/02665433.2022.2156067
S. Ward
{"title":"不完全属于:英国计划的不确定的欧洲联系","authors":"S. Ward","doi":"10.1080/02665433.2022.2156067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article takes a long view of British planning’s connections with continental Europe, locating Brexit within historic uncertainties about the country’s international outlook, interests and position. In 1948, Churchill portrayed Britain at the intersection of three ‘great circles’: the British Empire, the wider English-speaking world (principally the USA) and Europe. This notion is drawn on to show how the strong earlier European links of British planning were seriously disrupted or severed by twentieth-century wars. These drew both country and planning approach closer to its ‘distant friends’ within the other ‘great circles’. As former imperial ties faded and the USA relationship became less special, Britain looked again to Europe but without shedding these habitual links. Even after Britain joined the European Communities in 1973, its strongest international planning connections remained with the USA and its former Empire and Dominions. In the 1990s, the EU promoted spatial planning but Britain remained largely aloof until the ‘New Labour’ governments of 1997–2010. Yet growing Euroscepticism saw this relative enthusiasm fade, with Brexit reviving uncertainties, now about whether EU approaches should be jettisoned and a more deregulated planning system created. The article predicts (or at least hopes) that current anti-Europe thinking will itself fade.","PeriodicalId":46569,"journal":{"name":"Planning Perspectives","volume":"38 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not wholly belonging: British planning’s uncertain European connections\",\"authors\":\"S. Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02665433.2022.2156067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article takes a long view of British planning’s connections with continental Europe, locating Brexit within historic uncertainties about the country’s international outlook, interests and position. In 1948, Churchill portrayed Britain at the intersection of three ‘great circles’: the British Empire, the wider English-speaking world (principally the USA) and Europe. This notion is drawn on to show how the strong earlier European links of British planning were seriously disrupted or severed by twentieth-century wars. These drew both country and planning approach closer to its ‘distant friends’ within the other ‘great circles’. As former imperial ties faded and the USA relationship became less special, Britain looked again to Europe but without shedding these habitual links. Even after Britain joined the European Communities in 1973, its strongest international planning connections remained with the USA and its former Empire and Dominions. In the 1990s, the EU promoted spatial planning but Britain remained largely aloof until the ‘New Labour’ governments of 1997–2010. Yet growing Euroscepticism saw this relative enthusiasm fade, with Brexit reviving uncertainties, now about whether EU approaches should be jettisoned and a more deregulated planning system created. The article predicts (or at least hopes) that current anti-Europe thinking will itself fade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2022.2156067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2022.2156067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从长远的角度分析了英国规划与欧洲大陆的联系,将英国脱欧置于英国国际前景、利益和地位的历史不确定性之中。1948年,丘吉尔把英国描绘成三个“大圆”的交汇处:大英帝国、更广泛的英语世界(主要是美国)和欧洲。这一概念被用来说明英国早期与欧洲的紧密联系是如何被20世纪的战争严重破坏或切断的。这些都拉近了国家和规划方法与其他“大圈子”中的“远方朋友”的距离。随着前帝国关系的消退和与美国的关系变得不那么特殊,英国再次把目光投向欧洲,但没有摆脱这些惯常的联系。即使在1973年英国加入欧共体之后,其最强大的国际规划联系仍然是与美国及其前帝国和自治领。在20世纪90年代,欧盟推动了空间规划,但英国在1997-2010年的“新工党”政府之前基本上保持冷漠。然而,越来越多的欧洲怀疑论者看到这种相对热情消退,英国脱欧重新带来不确定性,现在是关于是否应该放弃欧盟的做法,以及是否应该建立一个更放松管制的计划体系。这篇文章预测(或者至少是希望)当前的反欧思潮将自行消退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Not wholly belonging: British planning’s uncertain European connections
ABSTRACT This article takes a long view of British planning’s connections with continental Europe, locating Brexit within historic uncertainties about the country’s international outlook, interests and position. In 1948, Churchill portrayed Britain at the intersection of three ‘great circles’: the British Empire, the wider English-speaking world (principally the USA) and Europe. This notion is drawn on to show how the strong earlier European links of British planning were seriously disrupted or severed by twentieth-century wars. These drew both country and planning approach closer to its ‘distant friends’ within the other ‘great circles’. As former imperial ties faded and the USA relationship became less special, Britain looked again to Europe but without shedding these habitual links. Even after Britain joined the European Communities in 1973, its strongest international planning connections remained with the USA and its former Empire and Dominions. In the 1990s, the EU promoted spatial planning but Britain remained largely aloof until the ‘New Labour’ governments of 1997–2010. Yet growing Euroscepticism saw this relative enthusiasm fade, with Brexit reviving uncertainties, now about whether EU approaches should be jettisoned and a more deregulated planning system created. The article predicts (or at least hopes) that current anti-Europe thinking will itself fade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Planning Perspectives is a peer-reviewed international journal of history, planning and the environment, publishing historical and prospective articles on many aspects of plan making and implementation. Subjects covered link the interest of those working in economic, social and political history, historical geography and historical sociology with those in the applied fields of public health, housing construction, architecture and town planning. The Journal has a substantial book review section, covering UK, North American and European literature.
期刊最新文献
Unplanned rapid urban growth in Birjand, Iran (1986–2022) Concrete city: material flows and urbanization in West Africa Concrete city: material flows and urbanization in West Africa , by Armelle Choplin, New York, Wiley, 2023, 240 pp., US$35 (paperback) ‘The first rearguard battle’: an analysis of the autarkic (re)planning for Spanish grain agriculture, 1937–1959 The urban planning transformation of Jaffa: pre and post-1948 perspectives Sultanahmet, Istanbul’s historic peninsula: musealization and urban conservationPinar Aykaç, Sultanahmet, Istanbul’s historic peninsula: musealization and urban conservation , London, Lexington Books, 274 pp., US$105(hardcover)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1