简·奥斯汀:凡夫俗子的不朽(以及与之相反的名声)

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Romanticism Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.3366/rom.2023.0592
E. Parisot
{"title":"简·奥斯汀:凡夫俗子的不朽(以及与之相反的名声)","authors":"E. Parisot","doi":"10.3366/rom.2023.0592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay considers the modern cultural forces behind Jane Austen’s fame by re-examining the commonplace hierarchical binaries that exist within the long history of Jane Austen’s reception – such as the tensions between scholarship and fandom, or elite and popular culture. It replaces the vertical axis upon which we commonly hang these binaries with a horizontal one, and reframes these competing forces as both centrifugal and centripetal in trajectory: centrifugal in one sense, owing to the passing of time, globalisation, the proliferation of genre and media, generating a myriad of afterlives; centripetal in another sense, as a counteracting desire to retain or recover the original, mortal figure of Austen the author (whether achievable or not). This reconceptualisation helps to reveal the ways in which this tension – so often negatively portrayed as a source of division and rancour in Austen scholarship and fandom – is actually the driving energy sustaining Austen’s seemingly endless fame. It does so by briefly considering Austen’s apotheosis in relation to Romantic notions of fame; the heteroglossic nature of Austen’s novels and their central role in generating diversifying cultural forces; and, how these contrasting cultural forces operate to sustain her modern iconic status. Centripetal and centrifugal forces are revealed to operate at key stages of Austen’s reception, but not always in balance. This suggestive discussion, then, is an examination of how this balance came to be.","PeriodicalId":42939,"journal":{"name":"Romanticism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jane Austen, Mortal Immortal (and Other Contrarieties of Fame)\",\"authors\":\"E. Parisot\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/rom.2023.0592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay considers the modern cultural forces behind Jane Austen’s fame by re-examining the commonplace hierarchical binaries that exist within the long history of Jane Austen’s reception – such as the tensions between scholarship and fandom, or elite and popular culture. It replaces the vertical axis upon which we commonly hang these binaries with a horizontal one, and reframes these competing forces as both centrifugal and centripetal in trajectory: centrifugal in one sense, owing to the passing of time, globalisation, the proliferation of genre and media, generating a myriad of afterlives; centripetal in another sense, as a counteracting desire to retain or recover the original, mortal figure of Austen the author (whether achievable or not). This reconceptualisation helps to reveal the ways in which this tension – so often negatively portrayed as a source of division and rancour in Austen scholarship and fandom – is actually the driving energy sustaining Austen’s seemingly endless fame. It does so by briefly considering Austen’s apotheosis in relation to Romantic notions of fame; the heteroglossic nature of Austen’s novels and their central role in generating diversifying cultural forces; and, how these contrasting cultural forces operate to sustain her modern iconic status. Centripetal and centrifugal forces are revealed to operate at key stages of Austen’s reception, but not always in balance. This suggestive discussion, then, is an examination of how this balance came to be.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanticism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanticism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/rom.2023.0592\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/rom.2023.0592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过重新审视简·奥斯汀漫长的接受历史中常见的等级二元关系,来思考简·奥斯汀成名背后的现代文化力量 – 比如学术与粉丝、精英与流行文化之间的紧张关系。它用水平轴取代了我们通常悬挂这些双星的纵轴,并将这些相互竞争的力量重新定义为轨道上的离心力和向心力:在某种意义上,由于时间的流逝、全球化、流派和媒体的扩散,离心力产生了无数的后遗症;从另一个意义上讲,向心是一种保留或恢复作者奥斯汀原始的、致命的形象的抵消欲望(无论是否可以实现)。这种重新概念化有助于揭示这种紧张关系的方式 – 经常被负面描述为奥斯汀学术和粉丝中分裂和仇恨的根源 – 实际上是支撑奥斯汀看似无穷无尽的名声的驱动力。它通过简单地考虑奥斯汀在浪漫主义名声观念方面的神化来做到这一点;奥斯汀小说的异质性及其在产生多样化文化力量中的核心作用;以及这些对比鲜明的文化力量是如何运作来维持她的现代标志性地位的。向心力和离心力在奥斯汀接受的关键阶段发挥作用,但并不总是平衡的。因此,这种具有启发性的讨论是对这种平衡是如何形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jane Austen, Mortal Immortal (and Other Contrarieties of Fame)
This essay considers the modern cultural forces behind Jane Austen’s fame by re-examining the commonplace hierarchical binaries that exist within the long history of Jane Austen’s reception – such as the tensions between scholarship and fandom, or elite and popular culture. It replaces the vertical axis upon which we commonly hang these binaries with a horizontal one, and reframes these competing forces as both centrifugal and centripetal in trajectory: centrifugal in one sense, owing to the passing of time, globalisation, the proliferation of genre and media, generating a myriad of afterlives; centripetal in another sense, as a counteracting desire to retain or recover the original, mortal figure of Austen the author (whether achievable or not). This reconceptualisation helps to reveal the ways in which this tension – so often negatively portrayed as a source of division and rancour in Austen scholarship and fandom – is actually the driving energy sustaining Austen’s seemingly endless fame. It does so by briefly considering Austen’s apotheosis in relation to Romantic notions of fame; the heteroglossic nature of Austen’s novels and their central role in generating diversifying cultural forces; and, how these contrasting cultural forces operate to sustain her modern iconic status. Centripetal and centrifugal forces are revealed to operate at key stages of Austen’s reception, but not always in balance. This suggestive discussion, then, is an examination of how this balance came to be.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Romanticism
Romanticism LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The most distinguished scholarly journal of its kind edited and published in Britain, Romanticism offers a forum for the flourishing diversity of Romantic studies today. Focusing on the period 1750-1850, it publishes critical, historical, textual and bibliographical essays prepared to the highest scholarly standards, reflecting the full range of current methodological and theoretical debate. With an extensive reviews section, Romanticism constitutes a vital international arena for scholarly debate in this liveliest field of literary studies.
期刊最新文献
Will Bowers, The Italian Idea: Anglo-Italian Radical Literary Culture, 18151823 Susan Civale, Romantic Women’s Life Writing: Reputation and Afterlife Parodying The Prelude: The Autobiography of John Cowper Powys ‘Godwin versus Godwin’: Negotiating the War of Ideas in Charles Lloyd’s Isabel, A Tale Katherine Bergren, The Global Wordsworth: Romanticism Out of Place and Jeffrey C. Robinson, Fibres of These Thoughts: Poetic Innovation in Wordsworth 1825–1833
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1