常设机构。数字经济中经合组织第五条MC的危机

Montserrat Hermosín Álvarez
{"title":"常设机构。数字经济中经合组织第五条MC的危机","authors":"Montserrat Hermosín Álvarez","doi":"10.47092/ct.21.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of the digital economy, breaking with business models that require a physical presence to develop their activities, has dislodged the traditional concept of permanent establishment set out in Article 5 OECD MC. In the light of the precept’s loopholes, large multinationals have engaged in abusive practices to relocate their profits, thus avoiding contributing in the States where the income is generated in accordance with their economic capacity. In this paper, we examine the concept of permanent establishment included in art. 5 OECD MC, its typology following the BEPS Project’s modifications and the different scenarios that do not constitute a permanent establishment. We also explore whether its legal regime continues to be useful in today’s context or whether, on the contrary, the moment has come to abandon the concept of permanent establishment entirely due to the problems generated by today’s article 5 OECD MC, unable to respond to the challenges posed by the digital economy.","PeriodicalId":52632,"journal":{"name":"Cronica Tributaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT. THE CRISIS OF THE ARTICLE 5 OECD MC IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY\",\"authors\":\"Montserrat Hermosín Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.47092/ct.21.3.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of the digital economy, breaking with business models that require a physical presence to develop their activities, has dislodged the traditional concept of permanent establishment set out in Article 5 OECD MC. In the light of the precept’s loopholes, large multinationals have engaged in abusive practices to relocate their profits, thus avoiding contributing in the States where the income is generated in accordance with their economic capacity. In this paper, we examine the concept of permanent establishment included in art. 5 OECD MC, its typology following the BEPS Project’s modifications and the different scenarios that do not constitute a permanent establishment. We also explore whether its legal regime continues to be useful in today’s context or whether, on the contrary, the moment has come to abandon the concept of permanent establishment entirely due to the problems generated by today’s article 5 OECD MC, unable to respond to the challenges posed by the digital economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cronica Tributaria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cronica Tributaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47092/ct.21.3.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cronica Tributaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47092/ct.21.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字经济的兴起,打破了需要实体存在才能开展活动的商业模式,推翻了经合组织《跨国公司法》第5条中规定的常设机构的传统概念。鉴于该规则的漏洞,大型跨国公司采取了滥用行为来转移利润,从而避免在根据其经济能力产生收入的国家捐款。在本文中,我们研究了第5条OECD MC中包含的常设机构的概念、BEPS项目修改后的类型以及不构成常设机构的不同情况。我们还探讨了其法律制度在今天的背景下是否仍然有用,或者恰恰相反,是否已经到了完全放弃常设机构概念的时刻,因为今天的经合组织第5条MC产生了问题,无法应对数字经济带来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT. THE CRISIS OF THE ARTICLE 5 OECD MC IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
The rise of the digital economy, breaking with business models that require a physical presence to develop their activities, has dislodged the traditional concept of permanent establishment set out in Article 5 OECD MC. In the light of the precept’s loopholes, large multinationals have engaged in abusive practices to relocate their profits, thus avoiding contributing in the States where the income is generated in accordance with their economic capacity. In this paper, we examine the concept of permanent establishment included in art. 5 OECD MC, its typology following the BEPS Project’s modifications and the different scenarios that do not constitute a permanent establishment. We also explore whether its legal regime continues to be useful in today’s context or whether, on the contrary, the moment has come to abandon the concept of permanent establishment entirely due to the problems generated by today’s article 5 OECD MC, unable to respond to the challenges posed by the digital economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
ASPECTOS CONTROVERTIDOS SOBRE LA TRIBUTACIÓN DE LAS ENTIDADES DEL TERCER SECTOR EN EL IMPUESTO SOBRE EL VALOR AÑADIDO EN LAS OPERACIONES INTERIORES EL TRATAMIENTO DE LOS RENDIMIENTOS DEL CAPITAL INMOBILIARIO EN EL IMPUESTO SOBRE LA RENTA DE LOS NO RESIDENTES: ENTRE EL PRINCIPIO COMUNITARIO DE LIBRE CIRCULACIÓN DE CAPITALES Y EL CONSTITUCIONAL DE IGUALDAD TRIBUTARIA EL (IN)CUMPLIMIENTO TRIBUTARIO: RESULTADOS DE SU INVESTIGACIÓN E IMPLICACIONES PARA EL DERECHO TRIBUTARIO de Bernardo D. Olivares Olivares y José Olivares Rodríguez EL DESCUBRIMIENTO DE «INDICIOS» DE DELITO EN LAS ACTUACIONES INSPECTORAS: LA EXPERIENCIA COMPARADA PROPUESTAS PARA ADAPTAR Y MEJORAR EL IRPF, EL IS Y EL IVA AL TRABAJO A DISTANCIA Y A LA REALIZACIÓN DE ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS O PROFESIONALES DESDE EL DOMICILIO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1