恢复性司法和从学校到监狱的管道:解决种族和民族不相称问题的概念框架

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Children & Schools Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI:10.1093/CS/CDAB014
Felipe I. Agudelo, Donna M. Cole, Sarah D. Gallant, Cassandra Mabee
{"title":"恢复性司法和从学校到监狱的管道:解决种族和民族不相称问题的概念框架","authors":"Felipe I. Agudelo, Donna M. Cole, Sarah D. Gallant, Cassandra Mabee","doi":"10.1093/CS/CDAB014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article develops a restorative justice framework that aims to address racial and ethnic disproportionality in the school-to-prison pipeline (STPP) in the United States. The framework uses literature on restorative justice and the STPP as its foundation and applies a restorative justice approach to three major strategies related to racial and ethnic disproportionality in the STPP: (1) school climate and school–student relationship, (2) a school’s cultural humility and connectedness, and (3) exclusionary discipline reduction. The first strategy proposes the development of respectful and credible relationships among teachers, staff, and students. The second suggests two techniques: (1) self-reflection to address implicit biases among teachers/administrators and (2) parental involvement. Both the first and the second strategies are considered prevention strategies. The third strategy uses techniques of intervention, including peer mediation, restorative circles, and community service, as alternative punishments. This framework theorizes that a focus on these three major strategies will challenge institutional racism in schools as a determinant of the disciplinary inequity that students of color experience. This framework further theorizes that addressing institutional racism through these specific interrelated strategies will result in three major outcomes that can decrease racial and ethnic disproportionality in the STPP.","PeriodicalId":35453,"journal":{"name":"Children & Schools","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restorative Justice and the School-to-Prison Pipeline: A Conceptual Framework to Address Racial and Ethnic Disproportionality\",\"authors\":\"Felipe I. Agudelo, Donna M. Cole, Sarah D. Gallant, Cassandra Mabee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CS/CDAB014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article develops a restorative justice framework that aims to address racial and ethnic disproportionality in the school-to-prison pipeline (STPP) in the United States. The framework uses literature on restorative justice and the STPP as its foundation and applies a restorative justice approach to three major strategies related to racial and ethnic disproportionality in the STPP: (1) school climate and school–student relationship, (2) a school’s cultural humility and connectedness, and (3) exclusionary discipline reduction. The first strategy proposes the development of respectful and credible relationships among teachers, staff, and students. The second suggests two techniques: (1) self-reflection to address implicit biases among teachers/administrators and (2) parental involvement. Both the first and the second strategies are considered prevention strategies. The third strategy uses techniques of intervention, including peer mediation, restorative circles, and community service, as alternative punishments. This framework theorizes that a focus on these three major strategies will challenge institutional racism in schools as a determinant of the disciplinary inequity that students of color experience. This framework further theorizes that addressing institutional racism through these specific interrelated strategies will result in three major outcomes that can decrease racial and ethnic disproportionality in the STPP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children & Schools\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children & Schools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CS/CDAB014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children & Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CS/CDAB014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文开发了一个恢复性司法框架,旨在解决美国从学校到监狱管道(STPP)中的种族和民族不相称问题。该框架以恢复性司法和STPP的相关文献为基础,并将恢复性司法方法应用于与STPP中种族和民族不成比例相关的三个主要策略:(1)学校气候和师生关系,(2)学校的文化谦逊和连通性,以及(3)减少排斥性纪律。第一个策略建议在教师、员工和学生之间建立相互尊重和信任的关系。第二部分提出了两种方法:(1)自我反思以解决教师/管理人员的内隐偏见;(2)家长参与。第一种和第二种战略都被视为预防战略。第三种策略使用干预技术,包括同伴调解、恢复性圈子和社区服务,作为替代惩罚。该框架认为,关注这三个主要策略将挑战学校中的制度性种族主义,因为这是有色人种学生所经历的学科不平等的决定因素。该框架进一步提出,通过这些具体的相互关联的策略来解决制度性种族主义问题,将产生三个主要结果,可以减少STPP中的种族和民族比例失调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Restorative Justice and the School-to-Prison Pipeline: A Conceptual Framework to Address Racial and Ethnic Disproportionality
This article develops a restorative justice framework that aims to address racial and ethnic disproportionality in the school-to-prison pipeline (STPP) in the United States. The framework uses literature on restorative justice and the STPP as its foundation and applies a restorative justice approach to three major strategies related to racial and ethnic disproportionality in the STPP: (1) school climate and school–student relationship, (2) a school’s cultural humility and connectedness, and (3) exclusionary discipline reduction. The first strategy proposes the development of respectful and credible relationships among teachers, staff, and students. The second suggests two techniques: (1) self-reflection to address implicit biases among teachers/administrators and (2) parental involvement. Both the first and the second strategies are considered prevention strategies. The third strategy uses techniques of intervention, including peer mediation, restorative circles, and community service, as alternative punishments. This framework theorizes that a focus on these three major strategies will challenge institutional racism in schools as a determinant of the disciplinary inequity that students of color experience. This framework further theorizes that addressing institutional racism through these specific interrelated strategies will result in three major outcomes that can decrease racial and ethnic disproportionality in the STPP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children & Schools
Children & Schools SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Children & Schools publishes professional materials relevant to social work services for children. The journal publishes articles on innovations in practice, interdisciplinary efforts, research, program evaluation, policy, and planning. Topics include student-authority relationships, multiculturalism, early intervention, needs assessment, violence, and ADHD. Children & Schools is a practitioner-to-practitioner resource.
期刊最新文献
The Dynamic Adaptation of the Journey of Hope: A School-Based Intervention to Support Pandemic and Disaster-Affected Children and Youth. Children & Schools From Intent to Impact: Building University-Assisted Community Schools in New Mexico School-Based Postvention Services: Exploring the Perspectives of Students Role of School Quality and Neighborhood Disadvantage in Educational Attainment: Do They Vary by Race?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1