Scott C Frost, J. Sánchez, Caroline P. Merrell, R. Larsen, H. Heymann, J. Harbertson
{"title":"西拉和赤霞珠葡萄酒的感官评价:收获成熟度和可溶性固形物优先化的影响","authors":"Scott C Frost, J. Sánchez, Caroline P. Merrell, R. Larsen, H. Heymann, J. Harbertson","doi":"10.5344/ajev.2020.20035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adjusting the soluble solids of the prefermentation must is a tool by which winemakers can manipulate the flavor profile of a wine. Total soluble solids (TSS) are often modified prior to fermentation by chaptalization or the addition of water, but can be modified also in the vineyard, by allowing the fruit to further mature on the vine. This work presents the effects of harvest maturity and prefermentation TSS on the flavor profile of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Syrah (SY) wines. Fruit from each cultivar was harvested at three approximate maturity targets: 20 Brix (unripe), 24 Brix (ripe), and 28 Brix (overripe). Must from each harvest was first divided, then the TSS was adjusted to match each of the target maturities; for example, portions of the 24 Brix harvest were adjusted to 20 or 28 Brix. Descriptive analysis found 10 attributes that varied significantly among the CS wines and 14 attributes which varied significantly among the SY wines. Harvest maturity primarily impacted the CS aroma profile, as wines produced from unripe fruit showed increased green aroma, but wines produced from ripe/overripe fruit showed increased jammy berries aroma. Increasing the prefermentation TSS of the CS must increased the intensity of bitterness, hotness, and viscosity, but decreased the sourness. The SY wine flavor profile was impacted heavily by increasing the prefermentation TSS, which showed greater intensities of astringency, ethanol aroma, hot mouthfeel, jammy fruit aroma, rose aroma, solvent aroma, ethanol aroma, and viscous mouthfeel. SY fruit maturity significantly affected astringency and earthy aroma, but an interactive effect between harvest maturity and TSS was found for sulfur, cabbage aroma, and bitterness.","PeriodicalId":7461,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","volume":"72 1","pages":"36 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensory Evaluation of Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon Wines: Effects of Harvest Maturity and Prefermentation Soluble Solids\",\"authors\":\"Scott C Frost, J. Sánchez, Caroline P. Merrell, R. Larsen, H. Heymann, J. Harbertson\",\"doi\":\"10.5344/ajev.2020.20035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adjusting the soluble solids of the prefermentation must is a tool by which winemakers can manipulate the flavor profile of a wine. Total soluble solids (TSS) are often modified prior to fermentation by chaptalization or the addition of water, but can be modified also in the vineyard, by allowing the fruit to further mature on the vine. This work presents the effects of harvest maturity and prefermentation TSS on the flavor profile of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Syrah (SY) wines. Fruit from each cultivar was harvested at three approximate maturity targets: 20 Brix (unripe), 24 Brix (ripe), and 28 Brix (overripe). Must from each harvest was first divided, then the TSS was adjusted to match each of the target maturities; for example, portions of the 24 Brix harvest were adjusted to 20 or 28 Brix. Descriptive analysis found 10 attributes that varied significantly among the CS wines and 14 attributes which varied significantly among the SY wines. Harvest maturity primarily impacted the CS aroma profile, as wines produced from unripe fruit showed increased green aroma, but wines produced from ripe/overripe fruit showed increased jammy berries aroma. Increasing the prefermentation TSS of the CS must increased the intensity of bitterness, hotness, and viscosity, but decreased the sourness. The SY wine flavor profile was impacted heavily by increasing the prefermentation TSS, which showed greater intensities of astringency, ethanol aroma, hot mouthfeel, jammy fruit aroma, rose aroma, solvent aroma, ethanol aroma, and viscous mouthfeel. SY fruit maturity significantly affected astringency and earthy aroma, but an interactive effect between harvest maturity and TSS was found for sulfur, cabbage aroma, and bitterness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2020.20035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2020.20035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sensory Evaluation of Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon Wines: Effects of Harvest Maturity and Prefermentation Soluble Solids
Adjusting the soluble solids of the prefermentation must is a tool by which winemakers can manipulate the flavor profile of a wine. Total soluble solids (TSS) are often modified prior to fermentation by chaptalization or the addition of water, but can be modified also in the vineyard, by allowing the fruit to further mature on the vine. This work presents the effects of harvest maturity and prefermentation TSS on the flavor profile of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Syrah (SY) wines. Fruit from each cultivar was harvested at three approximate maturity targets: 20 Brix (unripe), 24 Brix (ripe), and 28 Brix (overripe). Must from each harvest was first divided, then the TSS was adjusted to match each of the target maturities; for example, portions of the 24 Brix harvest were adjusted to 20 or 28 Brix. Descriptive analysis found 10 attributes that varied significantly among the CS wines and 14 attributes which varied significantly among the SY wines. Harvest maturity primarily impacted the CS aroma profile, as wines produced from unripe fruit showed increased green aroma, but wines produced from ripe/overripe fruit showed increased jammy berries aroma. Increasing the prefermentation TSS of the CS must increased the intensity of bitterness, hotness, and viscosity, but decreased the sourness. The SY wine flavor profile was impacted heavily by increasing the prefermentation TSS, which showed greater intensities of astringency, ethanol aroma, hot mouthfeel, jammy fruit aroma, rose aroma, solvent aroma, ethanol aroma, and viscous mouthfeel. SY fruit maturity significantly affected astringency and earthy aroma, but an interactive effect between harvest maturity and TSS was found for sulfur, cabbage aroma, and bitterness.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (AJEV), published quarterly, is an official journal of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture (ASEV) and is the premier journal in the English language dedicated to scientific research on winemaking and grapegrowing. AJEV publishes full-length research papers, literature reviews, research notes, and technical briefs on various aspects of enology and viticulture, including wine chemistry, sensory science, process engineering, wine quality assessments, microbiology, methods development, plant pathogenesis, diseases and pests of grape, rootstock and clonal evaluation, effect of field practices, and grape genetics and breeding. All papers are peer reviewed, and authorship of papers is not limited to members of ASEV. The science editor, along with the viticulture, enology, and associate editors, are drawn from academic and research institutions worldwide and guide the content of the Journal.