巢式rt - PCR对实时PCR阴性患者假阴性的评价

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology Pub Date : 2022-07-17 DOI:10.5812/jjm-122889
Mastaneh Alinezhadi, N. Neisi, M. Rasti, M. Arshadi, M. Parsanahad, B. Cheraghian
{"title":"巢式rt - PCR对实时PCR阴性患者假阴性的评价","authors":"Mastaneh Alinezhadi, N. Neisi, M. Rasti, M. Arshadi, M. Parsanahad, B. Cheraghian","doi":"10.5812/jjm-122889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fast and precise detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples and subsequent quarantine are two critical factors in preventing virus transmission and distribution through the community. The false-negative result is a major problem in the SARS-CoV-2 detection because of the kind of sample (swab sample), sampling error, and sensitivity of PCR test, which can be reduced by a much more sensitive test such as nested PCR. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the false-negative rate among samples that were negative by a real-time PCR test using RT-nested PCR. Methods: One hundred eighty-four negative samples were included in the study, and nucleic acid was extracted using a commercial kit based on a silica filter column and then subjected to RT-nested PCR using three sets of primers targeting Orf1ab, N, and RdRp regions. Results: Among 184 negative swab samples for SARS-CoV-2, 27 (14.6%) cases were positive for the Orf1ab gene using RT-nested PCR. The samples were tested using N and RdRp primer sets. Also, seven (3.8%) cases were positive for the N gene, and four (2.1%) cases were positive for the RdRp gene. Conclusions: The results indicated that RT-nested PCR could be more sensitive than real-time PCR and reduce the false-negative rate.","PeriodicalId":17803,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of False Negative Among SARS-COV-2 Patients with Negative Real-time PCR Result Using Nested-RT PCR\",\"authors\":\"Mastaneh Alinezhadi, N. Neisi, M. Rasti, M. Arshadi, M. Parsanahad, B. Cheraghian\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jjm-122889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Fast and precise detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples and subsequent quarantine are two critical factors in preventing virus transmission and distribution through the community. The false-negative result is a major problem in the SARS-CoV-2 detection because of the kind of sample (swab sample), sampling error, and sensitivity of PCR test, which can be reduced by a much more sensitive test such as nested PCR. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the false-negative rate among samples that were negative by a real-time PCR test using RT-nested PCR. Methods: One hundred eighty-four negative samples were included in the study, and nucleic acid was extracted using a commercial kit based on a silica filter column and then subjected to RT-nested PCR using three sets of primers targeting Orf1ab, N, and RdRp regions. Results: Among 184 negative swab samples for SARS-CoV-2, 27 (14.6%) cases were positive for the Orf1ab gene using RT-nested PCR. The samples were tested using N and RdRp primer sets. Also, seven (3.8%) cases were positive for the N gene, and four (2.1%) cases were positive for the RdRp gene. Conclusions: The results indicated that RT-nested PCR could be more sensitive than real-time PCR and reduce the false-negative rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-122889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-122889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:快速准确地检测临床样本中的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型核糖核酸和随后的隔离是防止病毒在社区传播和分布的两个关键因素。假阴性结果是严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测中的一个主要问题,因为样本的种类(拭子样本)、采样误差和PCR检测的敏感性,而嵌套PCR等更敏感的检测可以降低这种敏感性。目的:本研究旨在通过使用RT-nested PCR的实时PCR检测来评估阴性样本的假阴性率。方法:将184份阴性样本纳入研究,使用基于二氧化硅过滤柱的商业试剂盒提取核酸,然后使用靶向Orf1ab、N和RdRp区域的三组引物进行RT嵌套PCR。结果:在184份严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阴性拭子样本中,27例(14.6%)病例使用RT-nested PCR检测出Orf1ab基因阳性。使用N和RdRp引物组对样品进行测试。此外,7例(3.8%)N基因阳性,4例(2.1%)RdRp基因阳性。结论:RT-nested-PCR比实时PCR更灵敏,降低了假阴性率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of False Negative Among SARS-COV-2 Patients with Negative Real-time PCR Result Using Nested-RT PCR
Background: Fast and precise detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples and subsequent quarantine are two critical factors in preventing virus transmission and distribution through the community. The false-negative result is a major problem in the SARS-CoV-2 detection because of the kind of sample (swab sample), sampling error, and sensitivity of PCR test, which can be reduced by a much more sensitive test such as nested PCR. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the false-negative rate among samples that were negative by a real-time PCR test using RT-nested PCR. Methods: One hundred eighty-four negative samples were included in the study, and nucleic acid was extracted using a commercial kit based on a silica filter column and then subjected to RT-nested PCR using three sets of primers targeting Orf1ab, N, and RdRp regions. Results: Among 184 negative swab samples for SARS-CoV-2, 27 (14.6%) cases were positive for the Orf1ab gene using RT-nested PCR. The samples were tested using N and RdRp primer sets. Also, seven (3.8%) cases were positive for the N gene, and four (2.1%) cases were positive for the RdRp gene. Conclusions: The results indicated that RT-nested PCR could be more sensitive than real-time PCR and reduce the false-negative rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, (JJM) is the official scientific Monthly publication of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. JJM is dedicated to the publication of manuscripts on topics concerning all aspects of microbiology. The topics include medical, veterinary and environmental microbiology, molecular investigations and infectious diseases. Aspects of immunology and epidemiology of infectious diseases are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Examining the Frequency of Carbapenem Resistance Genes and Its Relationship with Different Classes of Integrons Including Classes I and II in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates of Burn Patients Vitamin D Deficiency and Receptor Polymorphisms as Risk Factors for COVID-19 Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in an Iranian Pediatric Sample with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Molecular Characterization and Phage Typing of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Clinical Samples in Isfahan, Iran Molecular Characteristics and the Effect of Mutations in Different Sites of the rplD Gene Among Clinical Isolates of Azithromycin Resistance Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Eastern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1