Re: Boeckstyns MEH, Merser S, Cool P.报告种植体存活。中华手外科杂志,2019,44 (4):763 - 763

A. Sayers
{"title":"Re: Boeckstyns MEH, Merser S, Cool P.报告种植体存活。中华手外科杂志,2019,44 (4):763 - 763","authors":"A. Sayers","doi":"10.1177/1753193419889806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I was interested to read the recommendations of Boeckstyns et al. in their recent article. Unfortunately, they have made a number of important factual errors that need correcting. They have fallen into the trap of misinterpreting what competing risk models do, or do not do as the case may be. In the article ‘Are competing risks models appropriate to describe implant failure?’ (Sayers et al., 2018), we describe the differences between Kaplan–Meier curves and the cumulative incidence function as estimated by competing risk models. In the penultimate paragraph we state:","PeriodicalId":73762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753193419889806","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re: Boeckstyns MEH, Merser S, Cool P. Reporting implant survival. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 761–3\",\"authors\":\"A. Sayers\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1753193419889806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I was interested to read the recommendations of Boeckstyns et al. in their recent article. Unfortunately, they have made a number of important factual errors that need correcting. They have fallen into the trap of misinterpreting what competing risk models do, or do not do as the case may be. In the article ‘Are competing risks models appropriate to describe implant failure?’ (Sayers et al., 2018), we describe the differences between Kaplan–Meier curves and the cumulative incidence function as estimated by competing risk models. In the penultimate paragraph we state:\",\"PeriodicalId\":73762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753193419889806\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419889806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419889806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我很有兴趣阅读Boeckstyns等人在他们最近的文章中的建议。不幸的是,他们犯了一些重要的事实错误,需要纠正。他们已经落入了错误解读相互竞争的风险模型能做什么或不能做什么的陷阱。在文章“竞争风险模型是否适合描述种植体失败?”(Sayers et al., 2018),我们描述了Kaplan-Meier曲线和通过竞争风险模型估计的累积发生率函数之间的差异。在倒数第二段,我们声明:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re: Boeckstyns MEH, Merser S, Cool P. Reporting implant survival. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 761–3
I was interested to read the recommendations of Boeckstyns et al. in their recent article. Unfortunately, they have made a number of important factual errors that need correcting. They have fallen into the trap of misinterpreting what competing risk models do, or do not do as the case may be. In the article ‘Are competing risks models appropriate to describe implant failure?’ (Sayers et al., 2018), we describe the differences between Kaplan–Meier curves and the cumulative incidence function as estimated by competing risk models. In the penultimate paragraph we state:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poland syndrome: a new classification system based on a retrospective analysis of 74 cases Management of conflict injuries to the upper limb. Part 2: reconstruction and managing complications Medium-term clinical outcomes of Zone 2B/2C finger flexor tendon repairs: influence of management of flexor digitorum superficialis Changes in tendon length and excursion following extensor tendon grafting at the distal radioulnar joint Abductor pollicis brevis rerouting and first web deepening for clasped thumb deformity in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1