小肠胃肠道间质瘤的开放与腹腔镜治疗

Amy Y Li, B. Visser
{"title":"小肠胃肠道间质瘤的开放与腹腔镜治疗","authors":"Amy Y Li, B. Visser","doi":"10.21037/LS-20-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common soft-tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Those found in the small bowel behave more aggressively than tumors originating in the stomach and confer a higher risk of metastases. Minimally invasive resection, including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, has been established as a safe and feasible alternative to conventional open resection for gastric GISTs, with improved perioperative morbidity and non-inferior oncologic outcomes. Data, however, are less established for small bowel tumors. Currently, there are emerging data suggesting that minimally invasive resection is a safe and feasible surgical option with similarly favorable outcomes for small bowel GISTs. Duodenal GISTs, rarer still, are a subset that offer unique anatomic challenges to minimally invasive resection. While minimally invasive approach for duodenal tumors has been described, data remains insufficient to draw clear conclusions on laparoscopic or robotic resection for GISTs located in the duodenum. Caution is merited to avoid overinterpretation of the current limited data. Future research to validate minimally invasive techniques for duodenal lesions is necessary. Regardless of minimally invasive approach, oncologic principles of resection apply. Surgical approach and oncologic planning are dependent on location and size of the tumor, with a range of surgical techniques illustrated in the literature. These techniques and surgical pearls are reviewed to guide technical decision making for these lesions. This narrative review aims to present the latest data on minimally invasive resection for small bowel and duodenal GISTs and discuss surgical considerations.","PeriodicalId":92818,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open versus laparoscopic treatment for small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors\",\"authors\":\"Amy Y Li, B. Visser\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/LS-20-90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common soft-tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Those found in the small bowel behave more aggressively than tumors originating in the stomach and confer a higher risk of metastases. Minimally invasive resection, including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, has been established as a safe and feasible alternative to conventional open resection for gastric GISTs, with improved perioperative morbidity and non-inferior oncologic outcomes. Data, however, are less established for small bowel tumors. Currently, there are emerging data suggesting that minimally invasive resection is a safe and feasible surgical option with similarly favorable outcomes for small bowel GISTs. Duodenal GISTs, rarer still, are a subset that offer unique anatomic challenges to minimally invasive resection. While minimally invasive approach for duodenal tumors has been described, data remains insufficient to draw clear conclusions on laparoscopic or robotic resection for GISTs located in the duodenum. Caution is merited to avoid overinterpretation of the current limited data. Future research to validate minimally invasive techniques for duodenal lesions is necessary. Regardless of minimally invasive approach, oncologic principles of resection apply. Surgical approach and oncologic planning are dependent on location and size of the tumor, with a range of surgical techniques illustrated in the literature. These techniques and surgical pearls are reviewed to guide technical decision making for these lesions. This narrative review aims to present the latest data on minimally invasive resection for small bowel and duodenal GISTs and discuss surgical considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laparoscopic surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laparoscopic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/LS-20-90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/LS-20-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃肠道间质瘤是最常见的胃肠道软组织肉瘤。在小肠中发现的肿瘤比起源于胃的肿瘤表现得更具攻击性,并具有更高的转移风险。微创切除术,包括腹腔镜和机器人方法,已被确定为传统胃GIST开放切除术的安全可行的替代方案,可改善围手术期发病率和非劣性肿瘤学结果。然而,关于小肠肿瘤的数据还不太确定。目前,有新的数据表明,微创切除是一种安全可行的手术选择,对小肠GIST也有类似的有利结果。十二指肠GIST,更为罕见,是一个为微创切除提供独特解剖挑战的子集。虽然已经描述了十二指肠肿瘤的微创手术方法,但数据仍不足以对位于十二指肠的GIST进行腹腔镜或机器人切除得出明确结论。应注意避免过度解读当前有限的数据。未来有必要对十二指肠损伤的微创技术进行验证研究。无论采用何种微创方法,肿瘤切除原则都适用。手术方法和肿瘤学计划取决于肿瘤的位置和大小,文献中介绍了一系列手术技术。对这些技术和手术珍珠进行回顾,以指导这些病变的技术决策。这篇叙述性综述旨在介绍小肠和十二指肠GIST微创切除的最新数据,并讨论手术注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open versus laparoscopic treatment for small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common soft-tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Those found in the small bowel behave more aggressively than tumors originating in the stomach and confer a higher risk of metastases. Minimally invasive resection, including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, has been established as a safe and feasible alternative to conventional open resection for gastric GISTs, with improved perioperative morbidity and non-inferior oncologic outcomes. Data, however, are less established for small bowel tumors. Currently, there are emerging data suggesting that minimally invasive resection is a safe and feasible surgical option with similarly favorable outcomes for small bowel GISTs. Duodenal GISTs, rarer still, are a subset that offer unique anatomic challenges to minimally invasive resection. While minimally invasive approach for duodenal tumors has been described, data remains insufficient to draw clear conclusions on laparoscopic or robotic resection for GISTs located in the duodenum. Caution is merited to avoid overinterpretation of the current limited data. Future research to validate minimally invasive techniques for duodenal lesions is necessary. Regardless of minimally invasive approach, oncologic principles of resection apply. Surgical approach and oncologic planning are dependent on location and size of the tumor, with a range of surgical techniques illustrated in the literature. These techniques and surgical pearls are reviewed to guide technical decision making for these lesions. This narrative review aims to present the latest data on minimally invasive resection for small bowel and duodenal GISTs and discuss surgical considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimally-invasive multidisciplinary treatment of deep endometriosis: 103 cases Case report: neuroendocrine tumour causing torsion of the appendix in an adolescent—a rare and unexpected twist Is elective cholecystectomy effective in geriatric patients to prevent new biliopancreatic events following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for benign biliopancreatic pathology? Managing complex pancreatic anastomoses after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Laparoscopic management of giant adrenal cyst: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1