“绝对价值与交换价值”:李嘉图价值理论的关键要素

Q3 Social Sciences Contributions to Political Economy Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.1093/CPE/BZX009
Manfredi De Leo
{"title":"“绝对价值与交换价值”:李嘉图价值理论的关键要素","authors":"Manfredi De Leo","doi":"10.1093/CPE/BZX009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that in his last paper Ricardo had arrived at a correct method for determining prices and distribution, which goes beyond the use of the labour theory of value, and therefore raises doubts on the pre-eminent position attributed to the labour theory of value in Ricardo’s thinking after the Essay on Profits, as maintained in Sraffa’s influential interpretation. A reconstruction of the numerical examples developed by Ricardo in that manuscript leads us to maintain that in fact he was determining prices by means of reduction equations, which he had come to view as a valid alternative to the labour theory of value. This appears to be confirmed by Ricardo’s conclusions in the same manuscript: the replacement of the labour theory with the notion of ‘absolute value’, expressing the price in terms of the ‘average commodity’, as provided by the reduction equation. It is also pointed out that Ricardo illustrates his final advance as a transition between two different measures of value, namely from labour embodied to the labour commanded by the commodity conceived as the invariable standard of value, and that in this respect some similarities can be found between Ricardo’s last pages on value and the puzzling passage of Production of Commodities in which Sraffa commutes his standard commodity into the ‘variable quantity of labour’ which the former is able to command.","PeriodicalId":38730,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CPE/BZX009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘ABSOLUTE VALUE AND EXCHANGEABLE VALUE’: A KEY ELEMENT IN RICARDO’S THEORY OF VALUE\",\"authors\":\"Manfredi De Leo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CPE/BZX009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article argues that in his last paper Ricardo had arrived at a correct method for determining prices and distribution, which goes beyond the use of the labour theory of value, and therefore raises doubts on the pre-eminent position attributed to the labour theory of value in Ricardo’s thinking after the Essay on Profits, as maintained in Sraffa’s influential interpretation. A reconstruction of the numerical examples developed by Ricardo in that manuscript leads us to maintain that in fact he was determining prices by means of reduction equations, which he had come to view as a valid alternative to the labour theory of value. This appears to be confirmed by Ricardo’s conclusions in the same manuscript: the replacement of the labour theory with the notion of ‘absolute value’, expressing the price in terms of the ‘average commodity’, as provided by the reduction equation. It is also pointed out that Ricardo illustrates his final advance as a transition between two different measures of value, namely from labour embodied to the labour commanded by the commodity conceived as the invariable standard of value, and that in this respect some similarities can be found between Ricardo’s last pages on value and the puzzling passage of Production of Commodities in which Sraffa commutes his standard commodity into the ‘variable quantity of labour’ which the former is able to command.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to Political Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CPE/BZX009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CPE/BZX009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CPE/BZX009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,里卡多在其上一篇论文中提出了一种正确的价格和分配确定方法,这种方法超越了劳动价值论的使用,因此对《利润论》之后的里卡多思想中劳动价值论所具有的卓越地位提出了质疑,正如斯拉法有影响力的解释所保持的那样。对里卡多在该手稿中提出的数字例子的重建使我们坚持认为,事实上,他是通过折减方程来确定价格的,他认为折减方程是劳动价值理论的有效替代方案。里卡多在同一手稿中的结论似乎证实了这一点:用“绝对价值”的概念取代了劳动理论,用“平均商品”来表示价格,正如减少方程所提供的那样。还有人指出,里卡多将他的最终进步描述为两种不同的价值衡量标准之间的转变,即从体现的劳动到被视为不变价值标准的商品所支配的劳动,在这方面,里卡多关于价值的最后几页和《商品生产》中令人困惑的一段话有一些相似之处,在这段话中,斯拉法将他的标准商品转化为前者能够指挥的“可变劳动量”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘ABSOLUTE VALUE AND EXCHANGEABLE VALUE’: A KEY ELEMENT IN RICARDO’S THEORY OF VALUE
The article argues that in his last paper Ricardo had arrived at a correct method for determining prices and distribution, which goes beyond the use of the labour theory of value, and therefore raises doubts on the pre-eminent position attributed to the labour theory of value in Ricardo’s thinking after the Essay on Profits, as maintained in Sraffa’s influential interpretation. A reconstruction of the numerical examples developed by Ricardo in that manuscript leads us to maintain that in fact he was determining prices by means of reduction equations, which he had come to view as a valid alternative to the labour theory of value. This appears to be confirmed by Ricardo’s conclusions in the same manuscript: the replacement of the labour theory with the notion of ‘absolute value’, expressing the price in terms of the ‘average commodity’, as provided by the reduction equation. It is also pointed out that Ricardo illustrates his final advance as a transition between two different measures of value, namely from labour embodied to the labour commanded by the commodity conceived as the invariable standard of value, and that in this respect some similarities can be found between Ricardo’s last pages on value and the puzzling passage of Production of Commodities in which Sraffa commutes his standard commodity into the ‘variable quantity of labour’ which the former is able to command.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contributions to Political Economy
Contributions to Political Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.
期刊最新文献
Economics Imperialism then and now: Ben Fine on the Changing Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences Money and Its Body in the Social Positioning and Credit Perspectives: Review Article of Samuel A. Chambers’ Money has No Value The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality: Sex, Politics, and Ideology The Place of Law In Political Economy. J.R.Commons’ Legal Foundations of Capitalism at 100: A Retrospective Article Pasinetti on The Cambridge Keynesians*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1