违约退休计划投资策略设计框架

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Retirement Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.3905/jor.2020.1.081
Edwin Lung, Craig Roodt, L. Ryan, G. Warren, K. Wymer
{"title":"违约退休计划投资策略设计框架","authors":"Edwin Lung, Craig Roodt, L. Ryan, G. Warren, K. Wymer","doi":"10.3905/jor.2020.1.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We identify and discuss four key elements to address when designing the investment strategy for default retirement plans: whether to cater for member needs or their wants, objectives, the member for which the default is being designed, and risk appetite. Addressing these design elements requires making assumptions about the member, of which the literature provides limited guidance to plan sponsors. We outline the main assumptions and demonstrate the potential impact on retirement experience through illustrative models. We find that mismatches between the member and the way that they are characterized can adversely impact on welfare. TOPICS: Long-term/retirement investing, retirement, portfolio management/multi-asset allocation, portfolio theory Key Findings ▪ We identify and discuss the elements that retirement plan providers should address when designing investment strategies for default members, highlighting the issues and challenges involved. ▪ The four elements are: whether to cater for member needs or their wants, objectives, the member for which the default is being designed, and risk appetite. ▪ Illustrative modelling underlines the importance of assumptions about objectives and risk appetite.","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"8 1","pages":"40 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Designing Investment Strategies for Default Retirement Plans\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Lung, Craig Roodt, L. Ryan, G. Warren, K. Wymer\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jor.2020.1.081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We identify and discuss four key elements to address when designing the investment strategy for default retirement plans: whether to cater for member needs or their wants, objectives, the member for which the default is being designed, and risk appetite. Addressing these design elements requires making assumptions about the member, of which the literature provides limited guidance to plan sponsors. We outline the main assumptions and demonstrate the potential impact on retirement experience through illustrative models. We find that mismatches between the member and the way that they are characterized can adversely impact on welfare. TOPICS: Long-term/retirement investing, retirement, portfolio management/multi-asset allocation, portfolio theory Key Findings ▪ We identify and discuss the elements that retirement plan providers should address when designing investment strategies for default members, highlighting the issues and challenges involved. ▪ The four elements are: whether to cater for member needs or their wants, objectives, the member for which the default is being designed, and risk appetite. ▪ Illustrative modelling underlines the importance of assumptions about objectives and risk appetite.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2020.1.081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2020.1.081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们确定并讨论了在为默认退休计划设计投资策略时需要解决的四个关键因素:是否满足成员的需求或他们的愿望、目标、默认退休计划所针对的成员以及风险偏好。处理这些设计元素需要对成员进行假设,其中文献对计划发起人提供了有限的指导。我们概述了主要假设,并通过说明性模型展示了对退休体验的潜在影响。我们发现,成员之间的不匹配以及他们被描述的方式会对福利产生不利影响。主题:长期/退休投资,退休,投资组合管理/多资产配置,投资组合理论。主要发现▪我们确定并讨论退休计划提供者在为违约成员设计投资策略时应考虑的因素,突出所涉及的问题和挑战。▪这四个要素是:是否满足成员的需要或愿望、目标、正在为其设计违约的成员以及风险偏好。▪说明性建模强调了关于目标和风险偏好的假设的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Framework for Designing Investment Strategies for Default Retirement Plans
We identify and discuss four key elements to address when designing the investment strategy for default retirement plans: whether to cater for member needs or their wants, objectives, the member for which the default is being designed, and risk appetite. Addressing these design elements requires making assumptions about the member, of which the literature provides limited guidance to plan sponsors. We outline the main assumptions and demonstrate the potential impact on retirement experience through illustrative models. We find that mismatches between the member and the way that they are characterized can adversely impact on welfare. TOPICS: Long-term/retirement investing, retirement, portfolio management/multi-asset allocation, portfolio theory Key Findings ▪ We identify and discuss the elements that retirement plan providers should address when designing investment strategies for default members, highlighting the issues and challenges involved. ▪ The four elements are: whether to cater for member needs or their wants, objectives, the member for which the default is being designed, and risk appetite. ▪ Illustrative modelling underlines the importance of assumptions about objectives and risk appetite.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investment Restrictions on Pension Participants: A Case Study of Nigeria Editor’s Letter The Role of Annuities in Managing Sequence of Returns Risk Approaching and in Retirement guest commentary Valuation of Financial Decision-Making Retirement Planning, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1