{"title":"感知、感性和思辨:气候危机时代的艺术作品","authors":"N. Seymour","doi":"10.1080/00043249.2022.2110427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Art, Visual Culture, and Climate Change, edited by T. J. Demos, Emily Eliza Scott, and Subhankar Banerjee, is a stunning achievement. It brings together fifty-five contributors from diverse backgrounds—including the Cherokee Nation, Lebanon, and South Africa—to think through climate-change-themed art and visual culture from regions ranging from Chiapas to Hong Kong. No comparable volume exists; as the editors point out, “within the environmental humanities . . . the visual arts are seldom foregrounded and sometimes sidelined,” while “art history as a discipline has . . . been slow in considering ecology and related environmental studies” (2). This achievement emerges at a curious impasse: climate change has advanced so as to become palpable to even the most privileged, while public responses—where they exist—often seem crushingly inadequate. Art and visual culture seem both necessary and dubious in this moment. To begin with, “climate change . . . presents profound representational dilemmas” (2) because of its lifetime-exceeding timescales but also because evidence of its violence regularly gets hidden, manipulated, or managed. As Caroline A. Jones points out in her chapter, “Atmospheres and the Anthropogenic ImageBind,” “idealistic images (the volunteer helping the oil-covered shore bird) were actively produced” by BP in the period after its Deepwater Horizon disaster, “as the corporation tripled its advertising budget” (247). In such a context, art and visual culture can function to reveal or counter-represent— though usually on much smaller budgets, if any. And yet such functions may prove to be a trap; images of climate disaster, particularly the more spectacular, can, as Birgit Schneider points out, “immobilize observers and put them in a state of sublime amazement” (271) rather than fomenting action. Further, those “representational dilemmas” may in fact be moot, given the aforementioned palpability of climate change: as contributor Sarah Kanouse narrates, “A few years ago, artists","PeriodicalId":45681,"journal":{"name":"ART JOURNAL","volume":"81 1","pages":"114 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensing, Sensitizing, and Speculating: The Work of Artworks in the Climate Crisis Era\",\"authors\":\"N. Seymour\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043249.2022.2110427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Art, Visual Culture, and Climate Change, edited by T. J. Demos, Emily Eliza Scott, and Subhankar Banerjee, is a stunning achievement. It brings together fifty-five contributors from diverse backgrounds—including the Cherokee Nation, Lebanon, and South Africa—to think through climate-change-themed art and visual culture from regions ranging from Chiapas to Hong Kong. No comparable volume exists; as the editors point out, “within the environmental humanities . . . the visual arts are seldom foregrounded and sometimes sidelined,” while “art history as a discipline has . . . been slow in considering ecology and related environmental studies” (2). This achievement emerges at a curious impasse: climate change has advanced so as to become palpable to even the most privileged, while public responses—where they exist—often seem crushingly inadequate. Art and visual culture seem both necessary and dubious in this moment. To begin with, “climate change . . . presents profound representational dilemmas” (2) because of its lifetime-exceeding timescales but also because evidence of its violence regularly gets hidden, manipulated, or managed. As Caroline A. Jones points out in her chapter, “Atmospheres and the Anthropogenic ImageBind,” “idealistic images (the volunteer helping the oil-covered shore bird) were actively produced” by BP in the period after its Deepwater Horizon disaster, “as the corporation tripled its advertising budget” (247). In such a context, art and visual culture can function to reveal or counter-represent— though usually on much smaller budgets, if any. And yet such functions may prove to be a trap; images of climate disaster, particularly the more spectacular, can, as Birgit Schneider points out, “immobilize observers and put them in a state of sublime amazement” (271) rather than fomenting action. Further, those “representational dilemmas” may in fact be moot, given the aforementioned palpability of climate change: as contributor Sarah Kanouse narrates, “A few years ago, artists\",\"PeriodicalId\":45681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ART JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ART JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2022.2110427\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ART JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2022.2110427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由T. J. Demos、Emily Eliza Scott和Subhankar Banerjee编辑的《劳特利奇当代艺术、视觉文化和气候变化指南》是一项惊人的成就。它汇集了55位来自不同背景的贡献者,包括切罗基族、黎巴嫩和南非,他们从恰帕斯到香港等地区思考气候变化主题的艺术和视觉文化。没有可比的体积存在;正如编辑们所指出的那样,“在环境人文学科中……视觉艺术很少被重视,有时被边缘化,”而“艺术史作为一门学科……”这一成就是在一个奇怪的僵局中出现的:气候变化已经发展到甚至对最特权的人来说都是显而易见的,而公众的反应——如果他们存在的话——往往显得极其不足。在这个时刻,艺术和视觉文化似乎既必要又可疑。首先,“气候变化……呈现出深刻的代表性困境”(2),因为它的寿命超过了时间尺度,也因为它的暴力证据经常被隐藏、操纵或管理。正如卡洛琳·a·琼斯(Caroline A. Jones)在她的章节《大气与人为图像绑定》(Atmospheres and the Anthropogenic ImageBind)中指出的那样,在深水地平线灾难发生后的一段时间里,英国石油公司“积极地制作了理想主义图像(志愿者帮助被石油覆盖的岸鸟)”,“公司的广告预算增加了两倍”(247)。在这种情况下,艺术和视觉文化可以起到揭示或反呈现的作用——尽管通常预算要小得多。然而,这些功能可能被证明是一个陷阱;正如Birgit Schneider所指出的那样,气候灾难的图像,尤其是那些更壮观的,可以“使观察者无法动弹,并使他们处于一种崇高的惊奇状态”(271),而不是煽动行动。此外,考虑到前面提到的气候变化的可感知性,那些“代表性的困境”实际上可能是没有意义的:正如撰稿人莎拉·卡努斯(Sarah Kanouse)所述,“几年前,艺术家们
Sensing, Sensitizing, and Speculating: The Work of Artworks in the Climate Crisis Era
The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Art, Visual Culture, and Climate Change, edited by T. J. Demos, Emily Eliza Scott, and Subhankar Banerjee, is a stunning achievement. It brings together fifty-five contributors from diverse backgrounds—including the Cherokee Nation, Lebanon, and South Africa—to think through climate-change-themed art and visual culture from regions ranging from Chiapas to Hong Kong. No comparable volume exists; as the editors point out, “within the environmental humanities . . . the visual arts are seldom foregrounded and sometimes sidelined,” while “art history as a discipline has . . . been slow in considering ecology and related environmental studies” (2). This achievement emerges at a curious impasse: climate change has advanced so as to become palpable to even the most privileged, while public responses—where they exist—often seem crushingly inadequate. Art and visual culture seem both necessary and dubious in this moment. To begin with, “climate change . . . presents profound representational dilemmas” (2) because of its lifetime-exceeding timescales but also because evidence of its violence regularly gets hidden, manipulated, or managed. As Caroline A. Jones points out in her chapter, “Atmospheres and the Anthropogenic ImageBind,” “idealistic images (the volunteer helping the oil-covered shore bird) were actively produced” by BP in the period after its Deepwater Horizon disaster, “as the corporation tripled its advertising budget” (247). In such a context, art and visual culture can function to reveal or counter-represent— though usually on much smaller budgets, if any. And yet such functions may prove to be a trap; images of climate disaster, particularly the more spectacular, can, as Birgit Schneider points out, “immobilize observers and put them in a state of sublime amazement” (271) rather than fomenting action. Further, those “representational dilemmas” may in fact be moot, given the aforementioned palpability of climate change: as contributor Sarah Kanouse narrates, “A few years ago, artists