“这就像狂野的西部”:新西兰奥特亚的用户体验(UX)设计师关于道德和隐私

IF 0.7 3区 艺术学 0 ART Design and Culture Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/17547075.2023.2211391
Alex Beattie, Cherie Lacey, C. Caudwell
{"title":"“这就像狂野的西部”:新西兰奥特亚的用户体验(UX)设计师关于道德和隐私","authors":"Alex Beattie, Cherie Lacey, C. Caudwell","doi":"10.1080/17547075.2023.2211391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The degree to which User Experience (UX) designers unfairly steer users’ behavior through the use of ‘dark patterns’ is a topical and contentious issue. Scholarship has largely assumed that designers are complicit in manipulating the user and undermining their privacy. In this paper, we investigate privacy dark patterns and report on interviews conducted with UX practitioners, describing three findings: (1) designers feel motivated to act ethically due to their ‘moral compasses’; (2) designers are restricted in their ability to act ethically due to commercial pressures and a limited purview of the project; (3) designers’ understanding of the ethics of their practice do not currently match determinations made by international privacy and design scholars and demonstrate a limited understanding of how user behavior can be shaped that, in turn, obfuscates beneficial privacy outcomes for users. We conclude by outlining the benefits of independent regulation and progressive ethics education in UX.","PeriodicalId":44307,"journal":{"name":"Design and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“It’s like the Wild West”: User Experience (UX) Designers on Ethics and Privacy in Aotearoa New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Alex Beattie, Cherie Lacey, C. Caudwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17547075.2023.2211391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The degree to which User Experience (UX) designers unfairly steer users’ behavior through the use of ‘dark patterns’ is a topical and contentious issue. Scholarship has largely assumed that designers are complicit in manipulating the user and undermining their privacy. In this paper, we investigate privacy dark patterns and report on interviews conducted with UX practitioners, describing three findings: (1) designers feel motivated to act ethically due to their ‘moral compasses’; (2) designers are restricted in their ability to act ethically due to commercial pressures and a limited purview of the project; (3) designers’ understanding of the ethics of their practice do not currently match determinations made by international privacy and design scholars and demonstrate a limited understanding of how user behavior can be shaped that, in turn, obfuscates beneficial privacy outcomes for users. We conclude by outlining the benefits of independent regulation and progressive ethics education in UX.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2023.2211391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2023.2211391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

用户体验(UX)设计师通过使用“暗模式”不公平地引导用户行为的程度是一个热门且有争议的问题。Scholarship在很大程度上认为设计师是操纵用户和破坏用户隐私的同谋。在本文中,我们调查了隐私黑暗模式,并报道了对用户体验从业者的采访,描述了三个发现:(1)设计师因其“道德指南针”而感到有动机采取合乎道德的行为;(2) 由于商业压力和项目范围有限,设计师的道德行为能力受到限制;(3) 设计师对其实践道德的理解目前与国际隐私和设计学者的决定不符,并且表明他们对如何塑造用户行为的理解有限,这反过来又混淆了对用户有益的隐私结果。最后,我们概述了用户体验中独立监管和渐进道德教育的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“It’s like the Wild West”: User Experience (UX) Designers on Ethics and Privacy in Aotearoa New Zealand
The degree to which User Experience (UX) designers unfairly steer users’ behavior through the use of ‘dark patterns’ is a topical and contentious issue. Scholarship has largely assumed that designers are complicit in manipulating the user and undermining their privacy. In this paper, we investigate privacy dark patterns and report on interviews conducted with UX practitioners, describing three findings: (1) designers feel motivated to act ethically due to their ‘moral compasses’; (2) designers are restricted in their ability to act ethically due to commercial pressures and a limited purview of the project; (3) designers’ understanding of the ethics of their practice do not currently match determinations made by international privacy and design scholars and demonstrate a limited understanding of how user behavior can be shaped that, in turn, obfuscates beneficial privacy outcomes for users. We conclude by outlining the benefits of independent regulation and progressive ethics education in UX.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Fen-Orchids, a Garden, and a Tandem in the (Post-)Jungle: Unsettling Care and Control in the European Borderscape Design Social Change: Take Action, Work Toward Equity, and Challenge the Status Quo Generative Design Research for a Culturally Sensitive Subject: Exploring Menstrual Practices and Product Experiences to Inspire Design Design Social Change: Take Action, Work Toward Equity, and Challenge the Status Quo Design and Heritage: The Construction of Identity and Belonging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1