美国朋克与“政治正确”修辞

IF 1.3 3区 艺术学 N/A MUSIC POPULAR MUSIC AND SOCIETY Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1080/03007766.2023.2184600
Michael S. Begnal
{"title":"美国朋克与“政治正确”修辞","authors":"Michael S. Begnal","doi":"10.1080/03007766.2023.2184600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the Trump era, conservative and alt-right commentators have framed punk rock subculture as a right-wing phenomenon, emphasizing punk’s individualism and “politically incorrect” rebellion as its defining characteristics. Taking a cultural studies approach, this article examines the rhetoric of so-called “political correctness” in contemporary American discourses surrounding the intersection of punk and politics. Its primary argument is that asserting an anti-PC stance disguises an underlying conservative agenda or reinscribes dominant narratives and that punk’s lack of a stable or inherent meaning (the “floating” nature of its signification, as Dick Hebdige described it) leaves it open to such rhetorical uses.","PeriodicalId":46155,"journal":{"name":"POPULAR MUSIC AND SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"American Punk and the Rhetoric of “Political Correctness”\",\"authors\":\"Michael S. Begnal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007766.2023.2184600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the Trump era, conservative and alt-right commentators have framed punk rock subculture as a right-wing phenomenon, emphasizing punk’s individualism and “politically incorrect” rebellion as its defining characteristics. Taking a cultural studies approach, this article examines the rhetoric of so-called “political correctness” in contemporary American discourses surrounding the intersection of punk and politics. Its primary argument is that asserting an anti-PC stance disguises an underlying conservative agenda or reinscribes dominant narratives and that punk’s lack of a stable or inherent meaning (the “floating” nature of its signification, as Dick Hebdige described it) leaves it open to such rhetorical uses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POPULAR MUSIC AND SOCIETY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POPULAR MUSIC AND SOCIETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2023.2184600\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POPULAR MUSIC AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2023.2184600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在特朗普时代,保守派和另类右翼评论员将朋克摇滚亚文化视为一种右翼现象,强调朋克的个人主义和“政治不正确”的反叛是其定义特征。本文采用文化研究的方法,考察了当代美国围绕朋克与政治交叉的话语中所谓的“政治正确”的修辞。它的主要论点是,主张反pc的立场掩盖了潜在的保守议程或重新定义了主导叙事,朋克缺乏稳定或固有的意义(正如迪克·赫伯迪(Dick Hebdige)所描述的那样,其意义的“浮动”性质),使其易于被这种修辞使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
American Punk and the Rhetoric of “Political Correctness”
ABSTRACT In the Trump era, conservative and alt-right commentators have framed punk rock subculture as a right-wing phenomenon, emphasizing punk’s individualism and “politically incorrect” rebellion as its defining characteristics. Taking a cultural studies approach, this article examines the rhetoric of so-called “political correctness” in contemporary American discourses surrounding the intersection of punk and politics. Its primary argument is that asserting an anti-PC stance disguises an underlying conservative agenda or reinscribes dominant narratives and that punk’s lack of a stable or inherent meaning (the “floating” nature of its signification, as Dick Hebdige described it) leaves it open to such rhetorical uses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Popular Music and Society, founded in 1971, publishes articles, book reviews, and audio reviews on popular music of any genre, time period, or geographic location. Popular Music and Society is open to all scholarly orientations toward popular music, including (but not limited to) historical, theoretical, critical, sociological, and cultural approaches. The terms "popular" and "society" are broadly defined to accommodate a wide range of articles on the subject. Recent and forthcoming Special Issue topics include: Digital Music Delivery, Cover Songs, the Music Monopoly, Jazz, and the Kinks. Popular Music and Society is published five times per year and is a peer-reviewed academic journal supported by an international editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Tree Indeed Groove Therapy God Gave Rock and Roll to You: A History of Contemporary Christian Music Rockin’ the Free World! How the Rock & Roll Revolution Changed America and the World Reconfiguring Genre, Style, and Idiolect: Investigating Progressive rock’s Meta-Genre and Affordances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1