审视饮食:弥合“实验室饮食”与“自由生活饮食”之间的鸿沟

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI:10.1086/720448
Kelly L. Haws, Peggy J. Liu, Brent McFerran, Pierre Chandon
{"title":"审视饮食:弥合“实验室饮食”与“自由生活饮食”之间的鸿沟","authors":"Kelly L. Haws, Peggy J. Liu, Brent McFerran, Pierre Chandon","doi":"10.1086/720448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food consumption and its physiological, psychological, and social antecedents and outcomes have received considerable attention in research across many disciplines, including consumer research. Although researchers use various methods to examine food decision making, many insights generated stem from observing eating choices in tightly controlled lab settings. Although much insight can be gained through such studies (or “lab eating”), it is apparent that many factors differ between such settings and everyday consumption (or “free-living eating”). This article highlights key differences between lab eating and free-living eating, discusses ways in which such differences matter, and provides recommendations for researchers regarding how and when to narrow the gap between them, including by enriching lab studies in ways inspired by free-living eating. Besides suggesting how researchers can conduct studies offering a deeper understanding of eating patterns, we also highlight practical implications for improving food consumption for consumers, marketers, and policy makers.","PeriodicalId":36388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"403 - 418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Eating: Bridging the Gap between “Lab Eating” and “Free-Living Eating”\",\"authors\":\"Kelly L. Haws, Peggy J. Liu, Brent McFerran, Pierre Chandon\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/720448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Food consumption and its physiological, psychological, and social antecedents and outcomes have received considerable attention in research across many disciplines, including consumer research. Although researchers use various methods to examine food decision making, many insights generated stem from observing eating choices in tightly controlled lab settings. Although much insight can be gained through such studies (or “lab eating”), it is apparent that many factors differ between such settings and everyday consumption (or “free-living eating”). This article highlights key differences between lab eating and free-living eating, discusses ways in which such differences matter, and provides recommendations for researchers regarding how and when to narrow the gap between them, including by enriching lab studies in ways inspired by free-living eating. Besides suggesting how researchers can conduct studies offering a deeper understanding of eating patterns, we also highlight practical implications for improving food consumption for consumers, marketers, and policy makers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"403 - 418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/720448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

食品消费及其生理、心理和社会的前因和结果在包括消费者研究在内的许多学科的研究中受到了相当大的关注。尽管研究人员使用各种方法来检查食物决策,但许多见解都来自于在严格控制的实验室环境中观察饮食选择。虽然通过这样的研究(或“实验室饮食”)可以获得很多见解,但很明显,在这样的环境和日常消费(或“自由生活饮食”)之间有许多不同的因素。这篇文章强调了实验室饮食和自由生活饮食之间的主要差异,讨论了这些差异的影响方式,并为研究人员提供了关于如何以及何时缩小两者之间差距的建议,包括通过受自由生活饮食启发的方式丰富实验室研究。除了建议研究人员如何进行研究,以更深入地了解饮食模式外,我们还强调了消费者、营销人员和政策制定者改善食品消费的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Eating: Bridging the Gap between “Lab Eating” and “Free-Living Eating”
Food consumption and its physiological, psychological, and social antecedents and outcomes have received considerable attention in research across many disciplines, including consumer research. Although researchers use various methods to examine food decision making, many insights generated stem from observing eating choices in tightly controlled lab settings. Although much insight can be gained through such studies (or “lab eating”), it is apparent that many factors differ between such settings and everyday consumption (or “free-living eating”). This article highlights key differences between lab eating and free-living eating, discusses ways in which such differences matter, and provides recommendations for researchers regarding how and when to narrow the gap between them, including by enriching lab studies in ways inspired by free-living eating. Besides suggesting how researchers can conduct studies offering a deeper understanding of eating patterns, we also highlight practical implications for improving food consumption for consumers, marketers, and policy makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Priming Young Minds – The Appeal of Gambling Advertising to Children and Young People. Mathematics is Good for the Mind and Body: Children Make Better Food Choices After Solving Math Problems Understanding the Past and Preparing for Tomorrow: Children and Adolescent Consumer Behavior Insights from Research in Our Field EDUCATING FOR ADOLESCENT WELL-BEING: IS IT TIME FOR MARKETPLACE LITERACY? The Effects of Social Media Consumption on Adolescent Psychological Well-Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1