边缘情报,残疾条款和模糊边界

Smitha Ramadas
{"title":"边缘情报,残疾条款和模糊边界","authors":"Smitha Ramadas","doi":"10.30834/kjp.33.2.2020.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diagnosis and boundaries of borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) lack clarity. The nosological status in DSM 5 and ICD 10 and 11 are also dubious. The provision of 'borderline disability' of 25 % for the category of Intellectual Disability, in the RPWD (Rights of persons with disability) act, falls below the benchmark disability criteria. The Kerala State commissioner for persons with disabilities categorises those with IQ between 70 and 84, as 'borderline intelligent' and provides the benefits of scribe/interpreter to them. Can the psychiatrist certify an entity which does not exist in the current classificatory systems? The author tries to highlight the fallacies in the implementation of disability provisions in Kerala for students with BIF and provides alternative solutions vis a vis the disability plea.","PeriodicalId":31047,"journal":{"name":"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Borderline intelligence, disability provisions and fuzzy borders\",\"authors\":\"Smitha Ramadas\",\"doi\":\"10.30834/kjp.33.2.2020.203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diagnosis and boundaries of borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) lack clarity. The nosological status in DSM 5 and ICD 10 and 11 are also dubious. The provision of 'borderline disability' of 25 % for the category of Intellectual Disability, in the RPWD (Rights of persons with disability) act, falls below the benchmark disability criteria. The Kerala State commissioner for persons with disabilities categorises those with IQ between 70 and 84, as 'borderline intelligent' and provides the benefits of scribe/interpreter to them. Can the psychiatrist certify an entity which does not exist in the current classificatory systems? The author tries to highlight the fallacies in the implementation of disability provisions in Kerala for students with BIF and provides alternative solutions vis a vis the disability plea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30834/kjp.33.2.2020.203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30834/kjp.33.2.2020.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

边缘性智力功能(BIF)的诊断和界限缺乏明确。在DSM 5和ICD 10和11中的分类学地位也不确定。《残疾人权利法》对智力残疾类别规定的“边缘残疾”比例为25%,低于残疾基准标准。喀拉拉邦残疾人专员将智商在70到84之间的人归类为“边缘智力”,并为他们提供抄写员/口译员的好处。精神科医生能否证明一个在现行分类系统中不存在的实体?作者试图强调喀拉拉邦对BIF学生实施残疾规定的谬论,并针对残疾请求提供替代解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Borderline intelligence, disability provisions and fuzzy borders
The diagnosis and boundaries of borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) lack clarity. The nosological status in DSM 5 and ICD 10 and 11 are also dubious. The provision of 'borderline disability' of 25 % for the category of Intellectual Disability, in the RPWD (Rights of persons with disability) act, falls below the benchmark disability criteria. The Kerala State commissioner for persons with disabilities categorises those with IQ between 70 and 84, as 'borderline intelligent' and provides the benefits of scribe/interpreter to them. Can the psychiatrist certify an entity which does not exist in the current classificatory systems? The author tries to highlight the fallacies in the implementation of disability provisions in Kerala for students with BIF and provides alternative solutions vis a vis the disability plea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retraction of “Psychosomatic problems in caregivers of patients with major mental illnesses.” Letters commenting on published articles: Last but not the least Lithium memoirs Holism is central to psychiatric practice Cognitive dysfunction in male inpatients with alcohol dependence: A comparative cross-sectional study from South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1