动态档案中的文件:质疑数字档案的全面革命

Q3 Arts and Humanities Proceedings from the Document Academy Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.35492/docam/8/2/4
R. Pierce
{"title":"动态档案中的文件:质疑数字档案的全面革命","authors":"R. Pierce","doi":"10.35492/docam/8/2/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital archive is often described in opposition to its physical counterpart. Media theorist Wolfgang Ernst has coined the term “dynarchive” to describe the former, a phrase that neatly contrasts digital archival remixability with the statis of the physical archive and its hierarchical fond structure. The article both uses and questions this characterization by examining the archive’s physical and digital document practices in three areas: (1) Hierarchical collection description versus individual document description; (2) Original order versus relevance-based results; and (3) Archival selection practices and the illusion of completeness. Archival structure and description have been central to the authority and evidentiary value of archival documents. Yet both the market logics of the internet and criticism from historically oppressed groups have challenged these connections. Using the dynarchive as a conceptual frame, this article examines archival digitization's potential for decolonization of the archive via its fragmentation into a non-hierarchical web of interrelated documents.","PeriodicalId":36214,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings from the Document Academy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documents in the Dynarchive: Questioning the Total Revolution of the Digital Archive\",\"authors\":\"R. Pierce\",\"doi\":\"10.35492/docam/8/2/4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The digital archive is often described in opposition to its physical counterpart. Media theorist Wolfgang Ernst has coined the term “dynarchive” to describe the former, a phrase that neatly contrasts digital archival remixability with the statis of the physical archive and its hierarchical fond structure. The article both uses and questions this characterization by examining the archive’s physical and digital document practices in three areas: (1) Hierarchical collection description versus individual document description; (2) Original order versus relevance-based results; and (3) Archival selection practices and the illusion of completeness. Archival structure and description have been central to the authority and evidentiary value of archival documents. Yet both the market logics of the internet and criticism from historically oppressed groups have challenged these connections. Using the dynarchive as a conceptual frame, this article examines archival digitization's potential for decolonization of the archive via its fragmentation into a non-hierarchical web of interrelated documents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings from the Document Academy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings from the Document Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/8/2/4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings from the Document Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/8/2/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字档案经常被描述为与其对应的实体档案的对立面。媒体理论家沃尔夫冈·恩斯特(Wolfgang Ernst)创造了“动态档案”(dynarchive)一词来描述前者,这个短语巧妙地将数字档案的再混合性与物理档案的静态状态及其分层结构进行了对比。本文通过在三个方面检查档案馆的物理和数字文档实践,对这种特征进行了使用和质疑:(1)分层收集描述与单个文档描述;(2)原始顺序与基于相关性的结果;(3)档案选择实践和完整性错觉。档案的结构和描述对档案文件的权威性和证据价值至关重要。然而,互联网的市场逻辑和历史上受压迫群体的批评都对这些联系提出了挑战。本文以动态档案为概念框架,探讨了档案数字化的潜力,通过将档案碎片化成一个相互关联的非分层网络,使档案非殖民化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Documents in the Dynarchive: Questioning the Total Revolution of the Digital Archive
The digital archive is often described in opposition to its physical counterpart. Media theorist Wolfgang Ernst has coined the term “dynarchive” to describe the former, a phrase that neatly contrasts digital archival remixability with the statis of the physical archive and its hierarchical fond structure. The article both uses and questions this characterization by examining the archive’s physical and digital document practices in three areas: (1) Hierarchical collection description versus individual document description; (2) Original order versus relevance-based results; and (3) Archival selection practices and the illusion of completeness. Archival structure and description have been central to the authority and evidentiary value of archival documents. Yet both the market logics of the internet and criticism from historically oppressed groups have challenged these connections. Using the dynarchive as a conceptual frame, this article examines archival digitization's potential for decolonization of the archive via its fragmentation into a non-hierarchical web of interrelated documents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings from the Document Academy
Proceedings from the Document Academy Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
This Sounds Like an Episode of The X-Files: Analyzing How Twitter Users Interpreted the COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Sci-Fi Television "i’m mixing comic book canon and mcu canon to suit my own needs": Information Sharing as Community Building in a Fandom in Flux Fandom, Fanzines, and Archiving Science Fiction Fannish History The Library Wants to Kill You: Places of Information as Battleground and Sanctum in Halo Halliday Journals and Holodecks: Audiences and Information in Sci-Fi Fandoms: Papers from the FanLIS 2023 Symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1