CAI有什么特别之处?

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Asia Pacific Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI:10.1080/10192557.2022.2085414
P. Mavroidis, A. Sapir
{"title":"CAI有什么特别之处?","authors":"P. Mavroidis, A. Sapir","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2022.2085414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) in the light of investment chapters contained in trade agreements that China and the EU have signed (separately obviously) with two countries: the Republic of Korea, like most EU countries, a member of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and Vietnam, a developing country and a nonmarket economy, where, like in China, state-owned enterprises play a substantial role. We find that the CAI innovates compared to these earlier trade agreements in some important dimensions, especially as far as the commitments accepted by China are concerned. Hence, the bilateral EU-China investment agreement could be useful for a future multilateral agreement in areas where current WTO rules do not provide sufficient discipline for countries like China.","PeriodicalId":42799,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Law Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"348 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is so special about CAI?\",\"authors\":\"P. Mavroidis, A. Sapir\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10192557.2022.2085414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) in the light of investment chapters contained in trade agreements that China and the EU have signed (separately obviously) with two countries: the Republic of Korea, like most EU countries, a member of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and Vietnam, a developing country and a nonmarket economy, where, like in China, state-owned enterprises play a substantial role. We find that the CAI innovates compared to these earlier trade agreements in some important dimensions, especially as far as the commitments accepted by China are concerned. Hence, the bilateral EU-China investment agreement could be useful for a future multilateral agreement in areas where current WTO rules do not provide sufficient discipline for countries like China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"348 - 366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2085414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2085414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从中国和欧盟与两个国家签署的贸易协定(显然是单独签署的)中包含的投资章节来考察欧盟-中国全面投资协定(CAI)。一个是韩国,像大多数欧盟国家一样,是经济合作与发展组织(oecd)成员国;另一个是越南,一个发展中国家和非市场经济国家,像中国一样,国有企业在其中发挥着重要作用。我们发现,与这些早期的贸易协定相比,CAI在一些重要方面有所创新,特别是就中国接受的承诺而言。因此,在当前WTO规则无法为中国等国家提供足够约束的领域,中欧双边投资协议可能有助于未来达成多边协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is so special about CAI?
ABSTRACT This article examines the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) in the light of investment chapters contained in trade agreements that China and the EU have signed (separately obviously) with two countries: the Republic of Korea, like most EU countries, a member of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and Vietnam, a developing country and a nonmarket economy, where, like in China, state-owned enterprises play a substantial role. We find that the CAI innovates compared to these earlier trade agreements in some important dimensions, especially as far as the commitments accepted by China are concerned. Hence, the bilateral EU-China investment agreement could be useful for a future multilateral agreement in areas where current WTO rules do not provide sufficient discipline for countries like China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Constitutional foundings in Northeast Asia Constitutional democracy in Indonesia Authoritarianism and legality Asia-Pacific trusts law Volume 1 theory and practice in context Varieties of authoritarian legality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1