{"title":"爆炸作用下结构响应的能量流考虑","authors":"K. Willems, T. Krauthammer, A. Ohrt","doi":"10.33586/hya.2023.3130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Load-impulse (P-I) diagrams are commonly used for structural design and damage assessment. Recently, an energy-based alternative to P-I diagrams, known as Energy vs. Energy Rate (E-R) diagrams, was proposed. E-R diagrams are another tool for structural design and damage assessment from an energy flow perspective. This paper describes a study to assess and compare these two analytical approaches, and to provide examples for illustrating the findings.","PeriodicalId":41423,"journal":{"name":"Hormigon y Acero","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Flow Considerations for Structural Response under Blast\",\"authors\":\"K. Willems, T. Krauthammer, A. Ohrt\",\"doi\":\"10.33586/hya.2023.3130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Load-impulse (P-I) diagrams are commonly used for structural design and damage assessment. Recently, an energy-based alternative to P-I diagrams, known as Energy vs. Energy Rate (E-R) diagrams, was proposed. E-R diagrams are another tool for structural design and damage assessment from an energy flow perspective. This paper describes a study to assess and compare these two analytical approaches, and to provide examples for illustrating the findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hormigon y Acero\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hormigon y Acero\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33586/hya.2023.3130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormigon y Acero","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33586/hya.2023.3130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Energy Flow Considerations for Structural Response under Blast
Load-impulse (P-I) diagrams are commonly used for structural design and damage assessment. Recently, an energy-based alternative to P-I diagrams, known as Energy vs. Energy Rate (E-R) diagrams, was proposed. E-R diagrams are another tool for structural design and damage assessment from an energy flow perspective. This paper describes a study to assess and compare these two analytical approaches, and to provide examples for illustrating the findings.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
