警务以外的性侵害

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Polity Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1086/726480
Gillian Harkins
{"title":"警务以外的性侵害","authors":"Gillian Harkins","doi":"10.1086/726480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spring 2020’s resurgence of Black Lives Matter protests crystallized longstanding organizing against policing and punishment. While these uprisings were neither new nor novel, throughout 2020 calls to defund the police gained greater political traction. Ongoing co-resistance organized across movements for Indigenous and Black lives and against settler nation borders contested the legitimacy of the U.S. as a colonial and racial state, while more mainstream media began to ask if carceral “abolition” could be a desirable, if not entirely practical, goal. While the resultant partial counter-hegemonies were viewed somewhat skeptically by those in existing abolitionist work, many also saw potential in the widening circulation of “abolition” as a concept. Activists and scholars seeking to dismantle often taken-for-granted systems of criminalization and punishment have drawn on W.E.B. Du Bois’s framing of “abolition democracy” in Black Reconstruction in America to connect struggles against racialized chattel slavery and its unreconstructed aftermath to later twentieth and early twenty-first century struggles against the “prison industrial complex” or “carceral state.” Even if curiosity, or skepticism, fueled some purchasers of Mariame Kaba’sWe Do This ‘Til We Free Us, its status as a New York Times bestseller held out hope that actual readers of the volume—along with other books soon to be published by influential abolitionists— might grapple seriously with calls to radically reconstruct existing systems toward a more just and equitable world.","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Harm Beyond Policing\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Harkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spring 2020’s resurgence of Black Lives Matter protests crystallized longstanding organizing against policing and punishment. While these uprisings were neither new nor novel, throughout 2020 calls to defund the police gained greater political traction. Ongoing co-resistance organized across movements for Indigenous and Black lives and against settler nation borders contested the legitimacy of the U.S. as a colonial and racial state, while more mainstream media began to ask if carceral “abolition” could be a desirable, if not entirely practical, goal. While the resultant partial counter-hegemonies were viewed somewhat skeptically by those in existing abolitionist work, many also saw potential in the widening circulation of “abolition” as a concept. Activists and scholars seeking to dismantle often taken-for-granted systems of criminalization and punishment have drawn on W.E.B. Du Bois’s framing of “abolition democracy” in Black Reconstruction in America to connect struggles against racialized chattel slavery and its unreconstructed aftermath to later twentieth and early twenty-first century struggles against the “prison industrial complex” or “carceral state.” Even if curiosity, or skepticism, fueled some purchasers of Mariame Kaba’sWe Do This ‘Til We Free Us, its status as a New York Times bestseller held out hope that actual readers of the volume—along with other books soon to be published by influential abolitionists— might grapple seriously with calls to radically reconstruct existing systems toward a more just and equitable world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726480\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2020年春季“黑人的命也重要”(Black Lives Matter)抗议活动的复苏,使长期以来反对警务和惩罚的组织具体化。虽然这些起义既不新鲜也不新颖,但在整个2020年,要求解除警察资金的呼吁获得了更大的政治吸引力。正在进行的联合抵抗运动组织了原住民和黑人的生活,反对移民国家边界,质疑美国作为殖民地和种族国家的合法性,而更多的主流媒体开始问,如果不是完全可行的话,“废除”奴隶制是否可能是一个可取的目标。虽然从事现有废奴主义工作的人对由此产生的部分反霸权持怀疑态度,但许多人也看到了扩大“废奴”概念传播的潜力。积极分子和学者试图废除通常被视为理所当然的定罪和惩罚制度,他们借鉴了W.E.B.杜波依斯在《美国黑人重建》中提出的“废除民主”框架,将反对种族化的奴隶制度及其未重建的后果的斗争与20世纪末和21世纪初反对“监狱工业复体”或“监狱国家”的斗争联系起来。即使好奇或怀疑促使一些人购买玛丽亚姆·卡巴的《我们这样做直到我们解放自己》,它作为《纽约时报》畅销书的地位给了读者希望,这本书的真正读者——以及其他有影响力的废奴主义者即将出版的书——可能会认真地呼吁从根本上重建现有制度,以建立一个更公正、更公平的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sexual Harm Beyond Policing
Spring 2020’s resurgence of Black Lives Matter protests crystallized longstanding organizing against policing and punishment. While these uprisings were neither new nor novel, throughout 2020 calls to defund the police gained greater political traction. Ongoing co-resistance organized across movements for Indigenous and Black lives and against settler nation borders contested the legitimacy of the U.S. as a colonial and racial state, while more mainstream media began to ask if carceral “abolition” could be a desirable, if not entirely practical, goal. While the resultant partial counter-hegemonies were viewed somewhat skeptically by those in existing abolitionist work, many also saw potential in the widening circulation of “abolition” as a concept. Activists and scholars seeking to dismantle often taken-for-granted systems of criminalization and punishment have drawn on W.E.B. Du Bois’s framing of “abolition democracy” in Black Reconstruction in America to connect struggles against racialized chattel slavery and its unreconstructed aftermath to later twentieth and early twenty-first century struggles against the “prison industrial complex” or “carceral state.” Even if curiosity, or skepticism, fueled some purchasers of Mariame Kaba’sWe Do This ‘Til We Free Us, its status as a New York Times bestseller held out hope that actual readers of the volume—along with other books soon to be published by influential abolitionists— might grapple seriously with calls to radically reconstruct existing systems toward a more just and equitable world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Does Size Matter in the Context of the Global South? Theorizing the Smallest States The Unique and the Universal in International Studies Theories from the Global South Ideas from the Global South: Dependency and Decoloniality Incorporating Global South Perspectives in the Study of International Relations: Reflections on the Field Long Day’s Journey Into Night
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1