食管癌放化疗后的抢救手术

Yaseen Al Lawati, L. Ferri
{"title":"食管癌放化疗后的抢救手术","authors":"Yaseen Al Lawati, L. Ferri","doi":"10.21037/aoe-2020-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Salvage esophageal resection after chemoradiation is an increasingly recognized clinical challenge, especially in the context of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Despite that, there have been varying definitions of salvage in the literature, leading to difficulties in interpreting data. This is further complicated by the limitations in assessing clinical complete response after chemoradiation. At the same time, salvage esophagectomy has classically been approached with reservation because of the associated morbidity and mortality, especially that definitive chemoradiation is sometimes the preferred choice of treatment for borderline-operable and borderline-resectable patients. While some reports have shown good survival outcomes, others have shown the opposite. Yet, the morbidity rate remains relatively high. From a surgical point of view, borderline-operable patients can be further optimized with specialized prehabilitation programs, which have been demonstrated to be useful in gastroesophageal cancers. Intraoperatively, there are important technical modifications that need to be taken into consideration. A special consideration should also be given to patients with limited airway involvement. In this review, we explore the different definitions of salvage and discuss clinical complete response after chemoradiation. We also discuss the postoperative and survival outcomes of salvage esophagectomy. A special focus is given to preoperative optimization and intraoperative technical aspects, including airway resection. Finally, the ongoing clinical trials looking into this subject are discussed.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Yaseen Al Lawati, L. Ferri\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/aoe-2020-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Salvage esophageal resection after chemoradiation is an increasingly recognized clinical challenge, especially in the context of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Despite that, there have been varying definitions of salvage in the literature, leading to difficulties in interpreting data. This is further complicated by the limitations in assessing clinical complete response after chemoradiation. At the same time, salvage esophagectomy has classically been approached with reservation because of the associated morbidity and mortality, especially that definitive chemoradiation is sometimes the preferred choice of treatment for borderline-operable and borderline-resectable patients. While some reports have shown good survival outcomes, others have shown the opposite. Yet, the morbidity rate remains relatively high. From a surgical point of view, borderline-operable patients can be further optimized with specialized prehabilitation programs, which have been demonstrated to be useful in gastroesophageal cancers. Intraoperatively, there are important technical modifications that need to be taken into consideration. A special consideration should also be given to patients with limited airway involvement. In this review, we explore the different definitions of salvage and discuss clinical complete response after chemoradiation. We also discuss the postoperative and survival outcomes of salvage esophagectomy. A special focus is given to preoperative optimization and intraoperative technical aspects, including airway resection. Finally, the ongoing clinical trials looking into this subject are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-2020-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-2020-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放化疗后补救性食管切除术是一个越来越被认可的临床挑战,特别是在食管鳞状细胞癌的背景下。尽管如此,文献中对救助的定义各不相同,导致解释数据的困难。放化疗后临床完全缓解评估的局限性使情况进一步复杂化。与此同时,由于相关的发病率和死亡率,抢救性食管切除术通常被保留,特别是对于边缘可手术和边缘可切除的患者,明确的放化疗有时是首选的治疗选择。虽然一些报告显示了良好的生存结果,但其他报告却显示了相反的结果。然而,发病率仍然相对较高。从外科的角度来看,边缘可手术患者可以通过专门的康复计划进一步优化,这已被证明对胃食管癌是有用的。术中,需要考虑一些重要的技术修改。对气道受累有限的患者也应给予特殊考虑。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了抢救的不同定义,并讨论了放化疗后的临床完全缓解。我们还讨论了挽救性食管切除术的术后和生存结果。特别关注术前优化和术中技术方面,包括气道切除。最后,讨论了正在进行的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer
: Salvage esophageal resection after chemoradiation is an increasingly recognized clinical challenge, especially in the context of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Despite that, there have been varying definitions of salvage in the literature, leading to difficulties in interpreting data. This is further complicated by the limitations in assessing clinical complete response after chemoradiation. At the same time, salvage esophagectomy has classically been approached with reservation because of the associated morbidity and mortality, especially that definitive chemoradiation is sometimes the preferred choice of treatment for borderline-operable and borderline-resectable patients. While some reports have shown good survival outcomes, others have shown the opposite. Yet, the morbidity rate remains relatively high. From a surgical point of view, borderline-operable patients can be further optimized with specialized prehabilitation programs, which have been demonstrated to be useful in gastroesophageal cancers. Intraoperatively, there are important technical modifications that need to be taken into consideration. A special consideration should also be given to patients with limited airway involvement. In this review, we explore the different definitions of salvage and discuss clinical complete response after chemoradiation. We also discuss the postoperative and survival outcomes of salvage esophagectomy. A special focus is given to preoperative optimization and intraoperative technical aspects, including airway resection. Finally, the ongoing clinical trials looking into this subject are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1