可持续发展报告的可读性调查

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Pub Date : 2021-04-08 DOI:10.2308/JETA-18-10-01-18
Nancy Uddin, Vasundhara Chakraborty
{"title":"可持续发展报告的可读性调查","authors":"Nancy Uddin, Vasundhara Chakraborty","doi":"10.2308/JETA-18-10-01-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirement of G4 standards as common practice in sustainability reporting makes it important to understand the readability of such reports. This study contributes to the extant body of literature by assessing the readability of sustainability reports. We investigate several factors such as company size, company age, complexity, domestic versus international, and audited versus unaudited reports and how they contribute to the readability of sustainability reports. We apply text analytics to U.S. and Global firm issued sustainability reports. We also provide evidence about factors that may contribute to the readability of sustainability reports. We find that reports of companies in regulated industries are less readable than other firms' reports. We also find that less complex firms have more readable sustainability reports. This study should provide some insights to users of sustainability reports, standard setters for reporting standards, and for future researchers.","PeriodicalId":45427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Investigation of the Readability of Sustainability Reports\",\"authors\":\"Nancy Uddin, Vasundhara Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/JETA-18-10-01-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Requirement of G4 standards as common practice in sustainability reporting makes it important to understand the readability of such reports. This study contributes to the extant body of literature by assessing the readability of sustainability reports. We investigate several factors such as company size, company age, complexity, domestic versus international, and audited versus unaudited reports and how they contribute to the readability of sustainability reports. We apply text analytics to U.S. and Global firm issued sustainability reports. We also provide evidence about factors that may contribute to the readability of sustainability reports. We find that reports of companies in regulated industries are less readable than other firms' reports. We also find that less complex firms have more readable sustainability reports. This study should provide some insights to users of sustainability reports, standard setters for reporting standards, and for future researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/JETA-18-10-01-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/JETA-18-10-01-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

G4标准的要求是可持续性报告的常见做法,因此理解此类报告的可读性非常重要。本研究通过评估可持续性报告的可读性,为现有文献做出了贡献。我们调查了几个因素,如公司规模、公司年龄、复杂性、国内与国际、经审计与未经审计的报告,以及它们如何提高可持续发展报告的可读性。我们将文本分析应用于美国和全球公司发布的可持续发展报告。我们还提供了可能有助于提高可持续性报告可读性的因素的证据。我们发现,与其他公司的报告相比,受监管行业公司的报告可读性较差。我们还发现,不那么复杂的公司有更可读的可持续发展报告。这项研究应该为可持续性报告的用户、报告标准的制定者以及未来的研究人员提供一些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Investigation of the Readability of Sustainability Reports
Requirement of G4 standards as common practice in sustainability reporting makes it important to understand the readability of such reports. This study contributes to the extant body of literature by assessing the readability of sustainability reports. We investigate several factors such as company size, company age, complexity, domestic versus international, and audited versus unaudited reports and how they contribute to the readability of sustainability reports. We apply text analytics to U.S. and Global firm issued sustainability reports. We also provide evidence about factors that may contribute to the readability of sustainability reports. We find that reports of companies in regulated industries are less readable than other firms' reports. We also find that less complex firms have more readable sustainability reports. This study should provide some insights to users of sustainability reports, standard setters for reporting standards, and for future researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
27.80%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Deloitte Canada’s Cocreated ICT Simulation for Advanced Accounting Navigating the Digital Landscape: Unraveling Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Affecting Digital Auditing Readiness in the Malaysian Public Sector A Tableau Teaching Application in Financial Data Analytics to State Local Governments: A Case Study on Louisiana Local Government Large Language Models: An Emerging Technology in Accounting Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1