小关节注射与射频小关节切开术治疗腰椎小关节关节病

A. Toubar, Osama Dawood
{"title":"小关节注射与射频小关节切开术治疗腰椎小关节关节病","authors":"A. Toubar, Osama Dawood","doi":"10.21608/ESJ.2019.4725.1057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: The facet arthropathy is the source of persistent low back pain that could refer to both lower limbs. The referred lower limb pain of facet origin may refer to the proximal lower extremities, buttocks, and/or back. The medial branches of the dorsal rami are the main innervations of the facet joints. Blocking pain transmission through these medial branches can be performed by conventional nerve block, intra-articular injection, and radiofrequency ablation.Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic benefits of the conventional facet joint block and the non pulsed radiofrequency denervation to the medial branches of dorsal rami in the treatment of facet arthropathy in non-surgical patients.Study Design: This study was a randomized clinical study included 58 patients suffering from chronic back pain due to facet joint arthropathy.Patients and Methods: Fifty-eight patients were included in this study. The outcome measure was: the visual analogue score (VAS) for low back pain. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group A: included 29 patients who were subjected to conventional facet join injection with steroids. Group B: included 29 patients who were subjected to radiofrequency denervation of the facet joints. All patients were regularly assessed through the follow up period of six months post intervention.Results: The study included 58 patients, 26 males; the mean age was 42.2±9.57 years. In group A, who had facet steroids injection, the mean preoperative VAS was 4.86±0.97, the mean post injection at one-week VAS was reduced to 4.29±0.94, at three months the mean VAS was 4.11±0.84, and at the sixth months; it dropped to 2.64±0.91. Preoperative and after six months VAS changes were not significant (P=0.1654). In group B, who had facet radiofrequency ablation, the mean preoperative VAS was 4.73±0.2, the mean post injection at one-week VAS was reduced to 3.40±0.12, at three months the mean VAS was 2.63±0.18, and at the sixth months it dropped to 1.8±0.14. Preoperative and after six months VAS changes were significant (P=0.0012).Conclusion: Both facet joint steroids injection and radiofrequency ablation have a significant result in non-surgical management of low back pain due to facet arthropathies. None-pulsed radiofrequency ablation has better results in pain relief at the third and sixth month post intervention when compared to facet steroids injection. (2018ESJ164)","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facet Joint Injection versus Radiofrequency Facet Neurotomy for Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Arthropathy\",\"authors\":\"A. Toubar, Osama Dawood\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ESJ.2019.4725.1057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Data: The facet arthropathy is the source of persistent low back pain that could refer to both lower limbs. The referred lower limb pain of facet origin may refer to the proximal lower extremities, buttocks, and/or back. The medial branches of the dorsal rami are the main innervations of the facet joints. Blocking pain transmission through these medial branches can be performed by conventional nerve block, intra-articular injection, and radiofrequency ablation.Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic benefits of the conventional facet joint block and the non pulsed radiofrequency denervation to the medial branches of dorsal rami in the treatment of facet arthropathy in non-surgical patients.Study Design: This study was a randomized clinical study included 58 patients suffering from chronic back pain due to facet joint arthropathy.Patients and Methods: Fifty-eight patients were included in this study. The outcome measure was: the visual analogue score (VAS) for low back pain. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group A: included 29 patients who were subjected to conventional facet join injection with steroids. Group B: included 29 patients who were subjected to radiofrequency denervation of the facet joints. All patients were regularly assessed through the follow up period of six months post intervention.Results: The study included 58 patients, 26 males; the mean age was 42.2±9.57 years. In group A, who had facet steroids injection, the mean preoperative VAS was 4.86±0.97, the mean post injection at one-week VAS was reduced to 4.29±0.94, at three months the mean VAS was 4.11±0.84, and at the sixth months; it dropped to 2.64±0.91. Preoperative and after six months VAS changes were not significant (P=0.1654). In group B, who had facet radiofrequency ablation, the mean preoperative VAS was 4.73±0.2, the mean post injection at one-week VAS was reduced to 3.40±0.12, at three months the mean VAS was 2.63±0.18, and at the sixth months it dropped to 1.8±0.14. Preoperative and after six months VAS changes were significant (P=0.0012).Conclusion: Both facet joint steroids injection and radiofrequency ablation have a significant result in non-surgical management of low back pain due to facet arthropathies. None-pulsed radiofrequency ablation has better results in pain relief at the third and sixth month post intervention when compared to facet steroids injection. (2018ESJ164)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2019.4725.1057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2019.4725.1057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景资料:关节突关节病变是可累及双下肢的持续性腰痛的根源。关节面起源的牵涉性下肢疼痛可涉及下肢近端、臀部和/或背部。背支的内侧支是关节突关节的主要神经支配。通过传统的神经阻滞、关节内注射和射频消融术可以阻断疼痛通过这些内侧分支的传递。目的:本研究的目的是比较传统的小关节阻滞和非脉冲射频去神经支配背支内侧支治疗非手术患者小关节病变的疗效。研究设计:本研究是一项随机临床研究,纳入了58例因小关节病变引起的慢性背痛患者。患者和方法:本研究纳入58例患者。结果测量为:腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)。患者随机分为两组:A组:29例患者接受常规关节突关节注射类固醇。B组:29例患者接受小关节射频去神经控制。所有患者在干预后6个月的随访期间定期接受评估。结果:共纳入58例患者,其中男性26例;平均年龄42.2±9.57岁。A组注射关节突类固醇,术前平均VAS为4.86±0.97,注射后1周平均VAS为4.29±0.94,3个月平均VAS为4.11±0.84,6个月平均VAS为4.11±0.84;跌至2.64±0.91。术前和术后6个月VAS变化无统计学意义(P=0.1654)。B组行关节突射频消融,术前平均VAS为4.73±0.2,注射后1周平均VAS降至3.40±0.12,3个月平均VAS为2.63±0.18,6个月平均VAS降至1.8±0.14。术前和术后6个月VAS变化显著(P=0.0012)。结论:小关节类固醇注射和射频消融术对小关节病变引起的腰痛的非手术治疗效果显著。与关节突类固醇注射相比,非脉冲射频消融术在干预后第3个月和第6个月的疼痛缓解效果更好。(2018 esj164)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facet Joint Injection versus Radiofrequency Facet Neurotomy for Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Arthropathy
Background Data: The facet arthropathy is the source of persistent low back pain that could refer to both lower limbs. The referred lower limb pain of facet origin may refer to the proximal lower extremities, buttocks, and/or back. The medial branches of the dorsal rami are the main innervations of the facet joints. Blocking pain transmission through these medial branches can be performed by conventional nerve block, intra-articular injection, and radiofrequency ablation.Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic benefits of the conventional facet joint block and the non pulsed radiofrequency denervation to the medial branches of dorsal rami in the treatment of facet arthropathy in non-surgical patients.Study Design: This study was a randomized clinical study included 58 patients suffering from chronic back pain due to facet joint arthropathy.Patients and Methods: Fifty-eight patients were included in this study. The outcome measure was: the visual analogue score (VAS) for low back pain. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group A: included 29 patients who were subjected to conventional facet join injection with steroids. Group B: included 29 patients who were subjected to radiofrequency denervation of the facet joints. All patients were regularly assessed through the follow up period of six months post intervention.Results: The study included 58 patients, 26 males; the mean age was 42.2±9.57 years. In group A, who had facet steroids injection, the mean preoperative VAS was 4.86±0.97, the mean post injection at one-week VAS was reduced to 4.29±0.94, at three months the mean VAS was 4.11±0.84, and at the sixth months; it dropped to 2.64±0.91. Preoperative and after six months VAS changes were not significant (P=0.1654). In group B, who had facet radiofrequency ablation, the mean preoperative VAS was 4.73±0.2, the mean post injection at one-week VAS was reduced to 3.40±0.12, at three months the mean VAS was 2.63±0.18, and at the sixth months it dropped to 1.8±0.14. Preoperative and after six months VAS changes were significant (P=0.0012).Conclusion: Both facet joint steroids injection and radiofrequency ablation have a significant result in non-surgical management of low back pain due to facet arthropathies. None-pulsed radiofrequency ablation has better results in pain relief at the third and sixth month post intervention when compared to facet steroids injection. (2018ESJ164)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Is There Any Role of Specialized Field Hospital in the Management of Low-Velocity Penetrating Peripheral Nerve Injuries? Short-Segment Posterior Fixation with Index Level Screws versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Awake Spine Surgery: Fad or Future? Pedicle Screw/Sublaminar Hook Fixation versus Pedicle Screw/Infraspinous Wire Fixation for Spondylolysis Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with MSCT Assessment Absence of the Musculocutaneous Nerve While Performing Nerve Transfer Surgery in a Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury, Rare Variant, and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1