哥伦比亚EPI的历史分析(2006-2014):环境信息的挑战

A. González, M. Echeverry‐Galvis
{"title":"哥伦比亚EPI的历史分析(2006-2014):环境信息的挑战","authors":"A. González, M. Echeverry‐Galvis","doi":"10.15446/ga.v22n1.78614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of environmental indicators has been established as a way of addressing different variables and objects of analysis, including the complexity of biodiversity and ecosystems along with human wellbeing. Since 2006, the Environmental Performance Index has been used, ranking countries according to status of various indicators. Colombia has been included in all evaluations with variable results in its ranking. We examine some aspects that vary through the years in terms of the index and the performance of Colombia in evaluations from 2006 to 2014, mostly because Colombia had excellent scores at the beginning of the index measure, but decrease notoriously in the last ones that have made. We found that the historical evaluation of the EPI had differences in its structure, with a greater reliability on international databases rather than national information, as well as a continuum change of the types of variables used for the indicators. On an international context, Colombia’s ranking variation reflects the differences in sources and accessibility of data. As useful as indexes might be to monitor and manage of resources, it is important to analyse each evaluation as much more than just the best and worst indicators, but rather to look at the sources, types of variables, ad context of each evaluation.","PeriodicalId":30434,"journal":{"name":"Gestion y Ambiente","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Analysis of EPI in Colombia (2006-2014): Challenges on Environmental Information\",\"authors\":\"A. González, M. Echeverry‐Galvis\",\"doi\":\"10.15446/ga.v22n1.78614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of environmental indicators has been established as a way of addressing different variables and objects of analysis, including the complexity of biodiversity and ecosystems along with human wellbeing. Since 2006, the Environmental Performance Index has been used, ranking countries according to status of various indicators. Colombia has been included in all evaluations with variable results in its ranking. We examine some aspects that vary through the years in terms of the index and the performance of Colombia in evaluations from 2006 to 2014, mostly because Colombia had excellent scores at the beginning of the index measure, but decrease notoriously in the last ones that have made. We found that the historical evaluation of the EPI had differences in its structure, with a greater reliability on international databases rather than national information, as well as a continuum change of the types of variables used for the indicators. On an international context, Colombia’s ranking variation reflects the differences in sources and accessibility of data. As useful as indexes might be to monitor and manage of resources, it is important to analyse each evaluation as much more than just the best and worst indicators, but rather to look at the sources, types of variables, ad context of each evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestion y Ambiente\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestion y Ambiente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v22n1.78614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestion y Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v22n1.78614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境指标的使用已被确定为解决不同变量和分析对象的一种方式,包括生物多样性和生态系统的复杂性以及人类福祉。自2006年以来,一直使用环境绩效指数,根据各种指标的状况对各国进行排名。哥伦比亚已被纳入所有评价,其排名结果各不相同。我们研究了哥伦比亚在2006年至2014年评估中的指数和表现在不同年份的一些方面,主要是因为哥伦比亚在指数衡量开始时得分很高,但在最后一次评估中却明显下降。我们发现,EPI的历史评估在结构上存在差异,国际数据库而非国家信息的可靠性更高,用于指标的变量类型也在不断变化。在国际范围内,哥伦比亚的排名变化反映了数据来源和可及性的差异。尽管指数对监测和管理资源可能很有用,但重要的是,分析每一次评估,而不仅仅是最好和最差的指标,而是要着眼于每一次评价的来源、变量类型和背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Historical Analysis of EPI in Colombia (2006-2014): Challenges on Environmental Information
The use of environmental indicators has been established as a way of addressing different variables and objects of analysis, including the complexity of biodiversity and ecosystems along with human wellbeing. Since 2006, the Environmental Performance Index has been used, ranking countries according to status of various indicators. Colombia has been included in all evaluations with variable results in its ranking. We examine some aspects that vary through the years in terms of the index and the performance of Colombia in evaluations from 2006 to 2014, mostly because Colombia had excellent scores at the beginning of the index measure, but decrease notoriously in the last ones that have made. We found that the historical evaluation of the EPI had differences in its structure, with a greater reliability on international databases rather than national information, as well as a continuum change of the types of variables used for the indicators. On an international context, Colombia’s ranking variation reflects the differences in sources and accessibility of data. As useful as indexes might be to monitor and manage of resources, it is important to analyse each evaluation as much more than just the best and worst indicators, but rather to look at the sources, types of variables, ad context of each evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metodologías participativas en la elaboración de estrategias de monitoreo comunitario de cantidad de agua para su gestión. Estudio de caso: Acueducto Comunitario Asoporquera, vereda Mochuelo Alto, Bogotá, DC Un enfoque desde la sustentabilidad: análisis de ciclo de vida como herramienta para la toma de decisiones en el desarrollo de proyectos hidroeléctricos en Colombia Energías comunitarias para la transición justa Política y emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero: el caso de Hidrosogamoso como Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio Participación ciudadana y conflictos ambientales en el Proyecto Hidroeléctrico Montebonito, Caldas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1