日惹医院慢性阻塞性肺病患者的治疗有效

Chynthia Pradiftha Sari, S. Hanifah., R. Rosdiana, Y. Anisa
{"title":"日惹医院慢性阻塞性肺病患者的治疗有效","authors":"Chynthia Pradiftha Sari, S. Hanifah., R. Rosdiana, Y. Anisa","doi":"10.22146/jmpf.56418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a complex respiratory disorder that requires multiple approaches to assess treatment response, no specific therapy can stop the progression of disease cure. This study aimed to measure the response of COPD treatment in outpatients at Hospitals in Yogyakarta. The study was designed descriptive observational cross-sectional involved  COPD outpatients in July 2018 - June 2019 (N = 156). Inclusion criteria the subjects: age> 40 years, without other respiratory diseases (asthma, lung cancer), took theophylline for at least the last one month, complete the CAT questionnaire, and sign an informed consent. Data collected were characteristics of respondents, treatment profile (exacerbation, maintenance), and response therapy data. Evaluation of treatment response was measured using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire and classified the response into effective, quite effective, and not effective. These data were then presented in form of percentage distribution. The results showed that an exacerbation study with single bronchodilator 39.10%, and a combination of bronchodilator with other bronchodilators 60.90%, most LABA-ICS / LAMA rescue therapies (48.72%). Results of evaluation the use of LABA-ICS / LAMA / Methylxanthine (18.59%), LABA-ICS / LAMA / Methylxanthine/ Mucolytic (11.54%), LABA-ICS / LAMA / SABA / Methylxanthine / Mucolytic (9.62%) )) gave a fairly effective treatment response (CAT score ≥10-19) 50.64%, effective (CAT score <10) 47.43%, ineffective (CAT score ≥20) 1.93%.","PeriodicalId":33008,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efektivitas Pengobatan pada Pasien Penyakit Paru Obstruksi Kronis (PPOK) di Rumah Sakit Wilayah Yogyakarta\",\"authors\":\"Chynthia Pradiftha Sari, S. Hanifah., R. Rosdiana, Y. Anisa\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/jmpf.56418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a complex respiratory disorder that requires multiple approaches to assess treatment response, no specific therapy can stop the progression of disease cure. This study aimed to measure the response of COPD treatment in outpatients at Hospitals in Yogyakarta. The study was designed descriptive observational cross-sectional involved  COPD outpatients in July 2018 - June 2019 (N = 156). Inclusion criteria the subjects: age> 40 years, without other respiratory diseases (asthma, lung cancer), took theophylline for at least the last one month, complete the CAT questionnaire, and sign an informed consent. Data collected were characteristics of respondents, treatment profile (exacerbation, maintenance), and response therapy data. Evaluation of treatment response was measured using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire and classified the response into effective, quite effective, and not effective. These data were then presented in form of percentage distribution. The results showed that an exacerbation study with single bronchodilator 39.10%, and a combination of bronchodilator with other bronchodilators 60.90%, most LABA-ICS / LAMA rescue therapies (48.72%). Results of evaluation the use of LABA-ICS / LAMA / Methylxanthine (18.59%), LABA-ICS / LAMA / Methylxanthine/ Mucolytic (11.54%), LABA-ICS / LAMA / SABA / Methylxanthine / Mucolytic (9.62%) )) gave a fairly effective treatment response (CAT score ≥10-19) 50.64%, effective (CAT score <10) 47.43%, ineffective (CAT score ≥20) 1.93%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.56418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.56418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种复杂的呼吸系统疾病,需要多种方法来评估治疗反应,没有特定的治疗方法可以阻止疾病的治愈进展。本研究旨在测量日惹医院门诊患者COPD治疗的反应。该研究设计为描述性观察横断面,涉及2018年7月至2019年6月的COPD门诊患者(N = 156)。纳入标准:受试者年龄在40岁至40岁之间,无其他呼吸系统疾病(哮喘、肺癌),服用茶碱至少一个月,完成CAT问卷,并签署知情同意书。收集的数据包括受访者的特征、治疗概况(恶化、维持)和反应性治疗数据。使用COPD评估测试(CAT)问卷对治疗反应进行评估,并将疗效分为有效、相当有效和无效。然后将这些数据以百分比分布的形式呈现。结果显示,在急性加重研究中,单用支气管扩张剂占39.10%,联用其他支气管扩张剂占60.90%,LABA-ICS / LAMA抢救治疗占48.72%。评价结果显示,使用LABA-ICS / LAMA /甲黄嘌呤(18.59%)、LABA-ICS / LAMA /甲黄嘌呤/ Mucolytic(11.54%)、LABA-ICS / LAMA / SABA /甲黄嘌呤/ Mucolytic(9.62%))的治疗效果相当有效(CAT评分≥10-19)50.64%,有效(CAT评分<10)47.43%,无效(CAT评分≥20)1.93%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efektivitas Pengobatan pada Pasien Penyakit Paru Obstruksi Kronis (PPOK) di Rumah Sakit Wilayah Yogyakarta
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a complex respiratory disorder that requires multiple approaches to assess treatment response, no specific therapy can stop the progression of disease cure. This study aimed to measure the response of COPD treatment in outpatients at Hospitals in Yogyakarta. The study was designed descriptive observational cross-sectional involved  COPD outpatients in July 2018 - June 2019 (N = 156). Inclusion criteria the subjects: age> 40 years, without other respiratory diseases (asthma, lung cancer), took theophylline for at least the last one month, complete the CAT questionnaire, and sign an informed consent. Data collected were characteristics of respondents, treatment profile (exacerbation, maintenance), and response therapy data. Evaluation of treatment response was measured using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire and classified the response into effective, quite effective, and not effective. These data were then presented in form of percentage distribution. The results showed that an exacerbation study with single bronchodilator 39.10%, and a combination of bronchodilator with other bronchodilators 60.90%, most LABA-ICS / LAMA rescue therapies (48.72%). Results of evaluation the use of LABA-ICS / LAMA / Methylxanthine (18.59%), LABA-ICS / LAMA / Methylxanthine/ Mucolytic (11.54%), LABA-ICS / LAMA / SABA / Methylxanthine / Mucolytic (9.62%) )) gave a fairly effective treatment response (CAT score ≥10-19) 50.64%, effective (CAT score <10) 47.43%, ineffective (CAT score ≥20) 1.93%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Cycle Threshold RT-PCR SARS Cov-2 between Saliva Specimen and Nasopharyngeal Swab Survei Kesediaan Menggunakan Telemedicine Pada Mahasiswa Farmasi Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta THE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT SAFETY CULTURE AMONG DOCTORS, NURSES AND PHARMACISTS IN A PUBLIC HOSPITAL IN INDONESIA Factor Affecting Job Satisfaction In Community Pharmacists: A Review Pengetahuan Masyarakat Tentang Penggunaan Suplemen Vitamin untuk Meningkatkan Imunitas Tubuh Selama Pandemi COVID-19 di Kelurahan Klender, Jakarta Timur dan Kecamatan Panimbang, Banten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1