不固定的时间线:连接殖民历史和当代结构

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Colonial Latin American Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232
K. Myers
{"title":"不固定的时间线:连接殖民历史和当代结构","authors":"K. Myers","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By connecting the colonial past and its presence today, we can gain deeper insight into both the colonial and contemporary periods—not just in Latin America and Europe but across the global north, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific world. This step away from the traditional geographical and temporal limits of our field takes as its point of departure the notion that colonialist scholars can offer a unique vantage point on modern and contemporary phenomena that so frequently reference Spanish colonialism. Soon after the signing of NAFTA in Mexico, for example, the newly formed Zapatista movement (EZLN) declared war on a 500-year-old legacy of conquest and colonialism, which the authoritarian Partido Institutional Revolucionario had fomented during its 70-year rule. More recently transnational artist Alfonso Cuarón stated that his film ‘Roma’ showcases not just class conflict but also social unrest that emerged from colonial and neo-colonial racial structures. Both of these examples not only cite colonial legacies as thematic remembrances of the past, they connect colonialism, modernity, and coloniality to ongoing—if still ever-changing—structures of race and power. As a scholar and teacher of Colonial Latin America, I have begun to explore ways to understand better these references to colonialism and the colonial past and their role in contemporary society. Recently, I invited four co-authors to investigate ways we might reorient our gaze to see more clearly this relationship. Rather than identify a set of entities under colonial erasure, we sought to track the operations of coloniality itself across a wide range of cultural and material production, across centuries, and across boundaries. Taking the intimate relationship between coloniality and modernity as a point of departure, our volume, Contemporary colonialities in Mexico and beyond, addresses three central questions: How does Mexican colonial history influence the definition of Mexico both from within and outside its borders? What issues rooted in coloniality recur over time and space? And finally, what cultural products can we study to illustrate, in a concrete and tangible way, the relationship between the evolution of colonialism and coloniality through history? We argue that understanding the foundational structures of Spanish colonialism provides insight into the evolution and perpetuation of practices and discourses of racial, ethnic, gender, and social exclusion rooted in Mexico’s history up to the present day. In my chapter for that volume, ‘An archaeology of coloniality,’ I argue that a spatial perspective can provide a useful lens to access the relationship between colonialism,","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"228 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unfixing timelines: connecting colonial pasts and contemporary constructs\",\"authors\":\"K. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By connecting the colonial past and its presence today, we can gain deeper insight into both the colonial and contemporary periods—not just in Latin America and Europe but across the global north, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific world. This step away from the traditional geographical and temporal limits of our field takes as its point of departure the notion that colonialist scholars can offer a unique vantage point on modern and contemporary phenomena that so frequently reference Spanish colonialism. Soon after the signing of NAFTA in Mexico, for example, the newly formed Zapatista movement (EZLN) declared war on a 500-year-old legacy of conquest and colonialism, which the authoritarian Partido Institutional Revolucionario had fomented during its 70-year rule. More recently transnational artist Alfonso Cuarón stated that his film ‘Roma’ showcases not just class conflict but also social unrest that emerged from colonial and neo-colonial racial structures. Both of these examples not only cite colonial legacies as thematic remembrances of the past, they connect colonialism, modernity, and coloniality to ongoing—if still ever-changing—structures of race and power. As a scholar and teacher of Colonial Latin America, I have begun to explore ways to understand better these references to colonialism and the colonial past and their role in contemporary society. Recently, I invited four co-authors to investigate ways we might reorient our gaze to see more clearly this relationship. Rather than identify a set of entities under colonial erasure, we sought to track the operations of coloniality itself across a wide range of cultural and material production, across centuries, and across boundaries. Taking the intimate relationship between coloniality and modernity as a point of departure, our volume, Contemporary colonialities in Mexico and beyond, addresses three central questions: How does Mexican colonial history influence the definition of Mexico both from within and outside its borders? What issues rooted in coloniality recur over time and space? And finally, what cultural products can we study to illustrate, in a concrete and tangible way, the relationship between the evolution of colonialism and coloniality through history? We argue that understanding the foundational structures of Spanish colonialism provides insight into the evolution and perpetuation of practices and discourses of racial, ethnic, gender, and social exclusion rooted in Mexico’s history up to the present day. In my chapter for that volume, ‘An archaeology of coloniality,’ I argue that a spatial perspective can provide a useful lens to access the relationship between colonialism,\",\"PeriodicalId\":44336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"228 - 234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colonial Latin American Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过将殖民地的过去及其今天的存在联系起来,我们可以更深入地了解殖民时期和当代——不仅在拉丁美洲和欧洲,而且在全球北部、非洲、亚洲和太平洋世界。这一步远离了我们领域传统的地理和时间限制,其出发点是殖民主义学者可以为经常提及西班牙殖民主义的现代和当代现象提供独特的视角。例如,在墨西哥签署《北美自由贸易协定》后不久,新成立的萨帕塔主义运动(EZLN)就向独裁的制度革命党在其70年统治期间煽动的长达500年的征服和殖民主义遗产宣战。最近,跨国艺术家阿方索·库隆(Alfonso Cuarón)表示,他的电影《罗姆人》不仅展示了阶级冲突,还展示了殖民主义和新殖民主义种族结构引发的社会动荡。这两个例子不仅将殖民遗产作为对过去的主题回忆,还将殖民主义、现代性和殖民主义与正在进行的——如果仍然不断变化的话——种族和权力结构联系起来。作为一名研究殖民地拉丁美洲的学者和教师,我已经开始探索如何更好地理解这些对殖民主义和殖民历史的提及,以及它们在当代社会中的作用。最近,我邀请了四位合著者来研究我们如何重新调整视线,以更清楚地看到这种关系。我们没有确定一组被殖民抹杀的实体,而是试图追踪殖民主义本身在广泛的文化和物质生产中、跨越几个世纪和跨越边界的运作。以殖民主义和现代性之间的密切关系为出发点,我们的著作《墨西哥内外的当代殖民主义》解决了三个核心问题:墨西哥殖民历史如何从其境内外影响墨西哥的定义?哪些植根于殖民主义的问题会随着时间和空间的推移而反复出现?最后,我们可以研究哪些文化产品,以具体和有形的方式说明殖民主义和殖民主义在历史上的演变之间的关系?我们认为,了解西班牙殖民主义的基本结构,可以深入了解墨西哥历史上至今根深蒂固的种族、族裔、性别和社会排斥的实践和话语的演变和延续。在我为那本书撰写的“殖民考古”一章中,我认为空间视角可以提供一个有用的视角来了解殖民主义之间的关系,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unfixing timelines: connecting colonial pasts and contemporary constructs
By connecting the colonial past and its presence today, we can gain deeper insight into both the colonial and contemporary periods—not just in Latin America and Europe but across the global north, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific world. This step away from the traditional geographical and temporal limits of our field takes as its point of departure the notion that colonialist scholars can offer a unique vantage point on modern and contemporary phenomena that so frequently reference Spanish colonialism. Soon after the signing of NAFTA in Mexico, for example, the newly formed Zapatista movement (EZLN) declared war on a 500-year-old legacy of conquest and colonialism, which the authoritarian Partido Institutional Revolucionario had fomented during its 70-year rule. More recently transnational artist Alfonso Cuarón stated that his film ‘Roma’ showcases not just class conflict but also social unrest that emerged from colonial and neo-colonial racial structures. Both of these examples not only cite colonial legacies as thematic remembrances of the past, they connect colonialism, modernity, and coloniality to ongoing—if still ever-changing—structures of race and power. As a scholar and teacher of Colonial Latin America, I have begun to explore ways to understand better these references to colonialism and the colonial past and their role in contemporary society. Recently, I invited four co-authors to investigate ways we might reorient our gaze to see more clearly this relationship. Rather than identify a set of entities under colonial erasure, we sought to track the operations of coloniality itself across a wide range of cultural and material production, across centuries, and across boundaries. Taking the intimate relationship between coloniality and modernity as a point of departure, our volume, Contemporary colonialities in Mexico and beyond, addresses three central questions: How does Mexican colonial history influence the definition of Mexico both from within and outside its borders? What issues rooted in coloniality recur over time and space? And finally, what cultural products can we study to illustrate, in a concrete and tangible way, the relationship between the evolution of colonialism and coloniality through history? We argue that understanding the foundational structures of Spanish colonialism provides insight into the evolution and perpetuation of practices and discourses of racial, ethnic, gender, and social exclusion rooted in Mexico’s history up to the present day. In my chapter for that volume, ‘An archaeology of coloniality,’ I argue that a spatial perspective can provide a useful lens to access the relationship between colonialism,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Colonial Latin American Review (CLAR) is a unique interdisciplinary journal devoted to the study of the colonial period in Latin America. The journal was created in 1992, in response to the growing scholarly interest in colonial themes related to the Quincentenary. CLAR offers a critical forum where scholars can exchange ideas, revise traditional areas of inquiry and chart new directions of research. With the conviction that this dialogue will enrich the emerging field of Latin American colonial studies, CLAR offers a variety of scholarly approaches and formats, including articles, debates, review-essays and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Devouring the empire: the Pijaos’ anticolonial project in the sixteenth-century northern Andes The conquest of Mexico: 500 years of reinventions Las reelaboraciones del denominado Manual del christiano de fray Bernardino de Sahagún en dos nuevos manuscritos: BCT 35-22, Montejano 2 The fame of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz: posthumous fashioning in the early modern Hispanic word Adrift on an inland sea: misinformation and the limits of empire in the Brazilian backlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1