2019冠状病毒病大流行期间印度尼西亚男性青少年的身体活动和久坐行为:使用加速度计、自动可穿戴相机、日记和访谈的混合方法案例研究

Fitria Dwi Andriyani, Katrien De Cocker, Aprida Agung Priambadha, Stuart J H Biddle
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间印度尼西亚男性青少年的身体活动和久坐行为:使用加速度计、自动可穿戴相机、日记和访谈的混合方法案例研究","authors":"Fitria Dwi Andriyani, Katrien De Cocker, Aprida Agung Priambadha, Stuart J H Biddle","doi":"10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous physical activity and sedentary behaviour studies during the pandemic have largely utilized online surveys, with known limitations including recall bias. Employing both device-based and self-reported measurements may provide a more comprehensive picture of both behaviours. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in adolescents is still limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Indonesia. Male adolescents had been identified as more active than females but have had a greater decrease in physical activity during the pandemic. The present study aimed to investigate the quantity, temporal patterns, contexts, and biopsychosocial factors of physical activity and sedentary behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in a small group of male Indonesian adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male adolescents (n = 5; 14-15 years old) from Yogyakarta wore accelerometers and automated wearable cameras for four days, and completed diaries and interviews in November 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' activity was dominated by light intensity (67% of all physical activity). Sedentary behaviour was high; accelerometer, school days: 456 ± 145 min (78 ± 10% of wear time), non-school days: 344 ± 160 min (79 ± 17% of wear time); camera, school days: 176 ± 101 min (81 ± 46% of wear time), non-school days: 210 ± 165 min (86 ± 67% of wear time). Sedentary behaviour was mainly done during school hours on school days and from late afternoon to evening on non-school days. Screen time was largely for leisure purposes and action games were most favoured. Smartphones were the most used device, mainly used in a solitary context in the bedroom. Non-screen-based sedentary behaviour was consistently low. Interviews suggested that during the pandemic, supporting factors for physical activity are: self-determination, enjoyment, parental support, and physical education; meanwhile, factors influencing screen time are: educational demands, device and internet availability, screen time opportunities, parental control, social facilitators, phone notifications, and emotional state.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants were not able to stay active during the pandemic. Using digital platforms may be beneficial to shift some screen-based sedentary behaviour to 'screen-based' or 'screen-prompted' physical activity.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":73581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors","volume":" ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of male adolescents in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-method case study using accelerometers, automated wearable cameras, diaries, and interviews.\",\"authors\":\"Fitria Dwi Andriyani, Katrien De Cocker, Aprida Agung Priambadha, Stuart J H Biddle\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous physical activity and sedentary behaviour studies during the pandemic have largely utilized online surveys, with known limitations including recall bias. Employing both device-based and self-reported measurements may provide a more comprehensive picture of both behaviours. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in adolescents is still limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Indonesia. Male adolescents had been identified as more active than females but have had a greater decrease in physical activity during the pandemic. The present study aimed to investigate the quantity, temporal patterns, contexts, and biopsychosocial factors of physical activity and sedentary behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in a small group of male Indonesian adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male adolescents (n = 5; 14-15 years old) from Yogyakarta wore accelerometers and automated wearable cameras for four days, and completed diaries and interviews in November 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' activity was dominated by light intensity (67% of all physical activity). Sedentary behaviour was high; accelerometer, school days: 456 ± 145 min (78 ± 10% of wear time), non-school days: 344 ± 160 min (79 ± 17% of wear time); camera, school days: 176 ± 101 min (81 ± 46% of wear time), non-school days: 210 ± 165 min (86 ± 67% of wear time). Sedentary behaviour was mainly done during school hours on school days and from late afternoon to evening on non-school days. Screen time was largely for leisure purposes and action games were most favoured. Smartphones were the most used device, mainly used in a solitary context in the bedroom. Non-screen-based sedentary behaviour was consistently low. Interviews suggested that during the pandemic, supporting factors for physical activity are: self-determination, enjoyment, parental support, and physical education; meanwhile, factors influencing screen time are: educational demands, device and internet availability, screen time opportunities, parental control, social facilitators, phone notifications, and emotional state.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants were not able to stay active during the pandemic. Using digital platforms may be beneficial to shift some screen-based sedentary behaviour to 'screen-based' or 'screen-prompted' physical activity.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以前大流行期间的身体活动和久坐行为研究主要利用在线调查,已知存在回忆偏差等局限性。同时采用基于设备的测量和自我报告的测量可以提供更全面的两种行为。在包括印度尼西亚在内的低收入和中等收入国家,青少年的身体活动和久坐行为研究仍然有限。男性青少年已被确定为比女性更活跃,但在大流行期间身体活动的减少幅度更大。本研究旨在调查一小群印度尼西亚男性青少年在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间身体活动和久坐行为的数量、时间模式、背景和生物心理社会因素。方法:男性青少年(n = 5;来自日惹的14-15岁的学生戴着加速度计和自动可穿戴相机四天,并于2020年11月完成日记和采访。结果:参与者的活动以轻强度为主(占所有体力活动的67%)。久坐行为高;加速度计,上学日:456±145分钟(磨损时间的78±10%),非上学日:344±160分钟(磨损时间的79±17%);相机,上学日:176±101分钟(磨损时间的81±46%),非上学日:210±165分钟(磨损时间的86±67%)。久坐行为主要发生在上学日的上课时间和非上学日的下午晚些时候到晚上。屏幕时间主要用于休闲目的,动作游戏最受欢迎。智能手机是使用最多的设备,主要是在卧室的独处环境中使用。非基于屏幕的久坐行为一直很低。访谈表明,在大流行期间,身体活动的支持因素是:自主、享受、父母支持和体育教育;同时,影响屏幕时间的因素有:教育需求、设备和互联网可用性、屏幕时间机会、父母控制、社交辅助、电话通知和情绪状态。结论:大多数参与者在大流行期间无法保持活跃。使用数字平台可能有助于将一些基于屏幕的久坐行为转变为“基于屏幕”或“屏幕提示”的身体活动。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of male adolescents in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-method case study using accelerometers, automated wearable cameras, diaries, and interviews.

Background: Previous physical activity and sedentary behaviour studies during the pandemic have largely utilized online surveys, with known limitations including recall bias. Employing both device-based and self-reported measurements may provide a more comprehensive picture of both behaviours. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in adolescents is still limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Indonesia. Male adolescents had been identified as more active than females but have had a greater decrease in physical activity during the pandemic. The present study aimed to investigate the quantity, temporal patterns, contexts, and biopsychosocial factors of physical activity and sedentary behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in a small group of male Indonesian adolescents.

Methods: Male adolescents (n = 5; 14-15 years old) from Yogyakarta wore accelerometers and automated wearable cameras for four days, and completed diaries and interviews in November 2020.

Results: Participants' activity was dominated by light intensity (67% of all physical activity). Sedentary behaviour was high; accelerometer, school days: 456 ± 145 min (78 ± 10% of wear time), non-school days: 344 ± 160 min (79 ± 17% of wear time); camera, school days: 176 ± 101 min (81 ± 46% of wear time), non-school days: 210 ± 165 min (86 ± 67% of wear time). Sedentary behaviour was mainly done during school hours on school days and from late afternoon to evening on non-school days. Screen time was largely for leisure purposes and action games were most favoured. Smartphones were the most used device, mainly used in a solitary context in the bedroom. Non-screen-based sedentary behaviour was consistently low. Interviews suggested that during the pandemic, supporting factors for physical activity are: self-determination, enjoyment, parental support, and physical education; meanwhile, factors influencing screen time are: educational demands, device and internet availability, screen time opportunities, parental control, social facilitators, phone notifications, and emotional state.

Conclusions: Most participants were not able to stay active during the pandemic. Using digital platforms may be beneficial to shift some screen-based sedentary behaviour to 'screen-based' or 'screen-prompted' physical activity.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44167-022-00014-0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The association of adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines with frailty and mortality: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of NHANES data Associations of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors with prevalent steatotic liver disease in middle-aged and older adults: the ELSA-Brasil study Charting the cascade of physical activities: implications for reducing sitting time and obesity in children An ecological view on the correlates of sedentary behavior in Brazilian adolescents: a cross-sectional study with network analysis Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep knowledge and self-efficacy among parents of young children in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1