基于HONcode原则的用户注视行为与健康网站质量评价的关系

Qin Qin , Qing Ke , Jia Tina Du , Yushan Xie
{"title":"基于HONcode原则的用户注视行为与健康网站质量评价的关系","authors":"Qin Qin ,&nbsp;Qing Ke ,&nbsp;Jia Tina Du ,&nbsp;Yushan Xie","doi":"10.2478/dim-2020-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While the health website is an easily accessible source for patients to use when seeking health information, the quality of online health information has been a critical issue that concerns all stakeholders in healthcare. The aim of this research was to examine the relationship between users' evaluation of the health website quality and their gaze behavior on the web pages. Eye tracking and a self-report questionnaire based on the HONcode principles were used to address the objective. We found that (1) the evaluations of authority, privacy, financial disclosure, and advertising policy are positively correlated with the fixation count and total fixation duration toward corresponding page components, while the evaluations of complementarity and attribution are negatively correlated with the fixation count and total fixation duration to corresponding page components; and (2) the fixation count and total fixation duration toward health information sources are negatively related to the evaluation of health website quality, while the fixation count and total fixation duration to site owner are positively related to the quality evaluation. Users' attention to page components is closely related to the evaluation of principles, and also has a certain impact on the overall quality evaluation of a health website. Based on the findings, our research may serve to improve the health website design and be a foundation to develop an automatic evaluation approach of the health website quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72769,"journal":{"name":"Data and information management","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 75-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000237/pdfft?md5=505d4cf3826e5cf99091270e3b6e9a62&pid=1-s2.0-S2543925122000237-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Users' Gaze Behavior Is Related to Their Quality Evaluation of a Health Website Based on HONcode Principles?\",\"authors\":\"Qin Qin ,&nbsp;Qing Ke ,&nbsp;Jia Tina Du ,&nbsp;Yushan Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/dim-2020-0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While the health website is an easily accessible source for patients to use when seeking health information, the quality of online health information has been a critical issue that concerns all stakeholders in healthcare. The aim of this research was to examine the relationship between users' evaluation of the health website quality and their gaze behavior on the web pages. Eye tracking and a self-report questionnaire based on the HONcode principles were used to address the objective. We found that (1) the evaluations of authority, privacy, financial disclosure, and advertising policy are positively correlated with the fixation count and total fixation duration toward corresponding page components, while the evaluations of complementarity and attribution are negatively correlated with the fixation count and total fixation duration to corresponding page components; and (2) the fixation count and total fixation duration toward health information sources are negatively related to the evaluation of health website quality, while the fixation count and total fixation duration to site owner are positively related to the quality evaluation. Users' attention to page components is closely related to the evaluation of principles, and also has a certain impact on the overall quality evaluation of a health website. Based on the findings, our research may serve to improve the health website design and be a foundation to develop an automatic evaluation approach of the health website quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data and information management\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 75-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000237/pdfft?md5=505d4cf3826e5cf99091270e3b6e9a62&pid=1-s2.0-S2543925122000237-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data and information management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data and information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

虽然健康网站是患者在寻求健康信息时易于访问的来源,但在线健康信息的质量一直是医疗保健领域所有利益相关者关注的关键问题。本研究旨在探讨使用者对健康网站品质的评价与他们在网页上的注视行为之间的关系。采用眼动追踪和基于HONcode原则的自我报告问卷来实现这一目标。研究发现:(1)权威评价、隐私评价、财务披露评价和广告政策评价与相应页面组件的固定次数和总固定时长呈显著正相关,互补性评价和归因评价与相应页面组件的固定次数和总固定时长呈显著负相关;(2)对健康信息源的注视次数和总注视时长与健康网站质量评价呈负相关,对网站所有者的注视次数和总注视时长与健康网站质量评价呈正相关。用户对页面组件的关注程度与评价原则密切相关,对健康网站的整体质量评价也有一定的影响。本研究可为健康网站设计提供参考,并为健康网站质量自动评估方法的建立奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Users' Gaze Behavior Is Related to Their Quality Evaluation of a Health Website Based on HONcode Principles?

While the health website is an easily accessible source for patients to use when seeking health information, the quality of online health information has been a critical issue that concerns all stakeholders in healthcare. The aim of this research was to examine the relationship between users' evaluation of the health website quality and their gaze behavior on the web pages. Eye tracking and a self-report questionnaire based on the HONcode principles were used to address the objective. We found that (1) the evaluations of authority, privacy, financial disclosure, and advertising policy are positively correlated with the fixation count and total fixation duration toward corresponding page components, while the evaluations of complementarity and attribution are negatively correlated with the fixation count and total fixation duration to corresponding page components; and (2) the fixation count and total fixation duration toward health information sources are negatively related to the evaluation of health website quality, while the fixation count and total fixation duration to site owner are positively related to the quality evaluation. Users' attention to page components is closely related to the evaluation of principles, and also has a certain impact on the overall quality evaluation of a health website. Based on the findings, our research may serve to improve the health website design and be a foundation to develop an automatic evaluation approach of the health website quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data and information management
Data and information management Management Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles (Volume 6, Issues 1–4) Improved detection of transient events in wide area sky survey using convolutional neural networks An evaluation method of academic output that considers productivity differences Adaptive K-means clustering based under-sampling methods to solve the class imbalance problem Does internet use affect public risk perception? — From the perspective of political participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1