改变临床医生对风险制定和HCR-20v3在暴力评估和管理中所起作用的看法

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Practice Pub Date : 2019-11-11 DOI:10.1108/jfp-05-2019-0019
E. E. Covernton, A. Moores, J. Lowenstein
{"title":"改变临床医生对风险制定和HCR-20v3在暴力评估和管理中所起作用的看法","authors":"E. E. Covernton, A. Moores, J. Lowenstein","doi":"10.1108/jfp-05-2019-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe assessment and management of risk towards others is an integral part of clinical practice, particularly in forensic and other psychiatric settings. Version 3 of the HCR-20 is the latest version of a comprehensive set of professional guidelines based on the Structured Professional Judgement model. It is the most widely used and best validated tool available to assess risk of violence; however, clinicians perceive it as an additional task with limited clinical usefulness, which requires undergoing expensive training and takes considerable time to implement. The paper aims to discuss these issues.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTraining was delivered to 148 clinicians to improve perceptions with regard to risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 as an effective and clinically useful tool in generating individual and robust care plans to minimise risk of violence.\n\n\nFindings\nResults indicated significant score increase post-training, indicating higher regard for the HCR-20 in terms of its usefulness, anticipated impact upon working, anticipated impact upon managing risk, ease of completion and perceived relevance to clinical practice. This was also consistent with qualitative feedback indicating improved risk management and care planning with reference to how learning would support respective roles. Feedback also highlighted the added value of certain aspects of the training provided, which may be useful to consider when designing HCR-20 training packages.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study demonstrates the importance of engaging clinicians in bespoke training on the practicalities of HCR-20 completion and the fundamentals of risk formulation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study highlights the importance of incorporating a training package for staff of all disciplines in changing perceptions of risk management tools and thus their use in the practical management of violence. The useful aspects of training may assist changing perceptions of the role that risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 play in the assessment and management of violence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research suggests that if this can be done successfully, it may lead to a change in the perception of the role that the HCR-20v3 can play in assessing risk of violence and generating meaningful management plans to reduce the future likelihood of violence.\n","PeriodicalId":44049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jfp-05-2019-0019","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing clinicians’ perceptions of the role that risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 play in the assessment and management of violence\",\"authors\":\"E. E. Covernton, A. Moores, J. Lowenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jfp-05-2019-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe assessment and management of risk towards others is an integral part of clinical practice, particularly in forensic and other psychiatric settings. Version 3 of the HCR-20 is the latest version of a comprehensive set of professional guidelines based on the Structured Professional Judgement model. It is the most widely used and best validated tool available to assess risk of violence; however, clinicians perceive it as an additional task with limited clinical usefulness, which requires undergoing expensive training and takes considerable time to implement. The paper aims to discuss these issues.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nTraining was delivered to 148 clinicians to improve perceptions with regard to risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 as an effective and clinically useful tool in generating individual and robust care plans to minimise risk of violence.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResults indicated significant score increase post-training, indicating higher regard for the HCR-20 in terms of its usefulness, anticipated impact upon working, anticipated impact upon managing risk, ease of completion and perceived relevance to clinical practice. This was also consistent with qualitative feedback indicating improved risk management and care planning with reference to how learning would support respective roles. Feedback also highlighted the added value of certain aspects of the training provided, which may be useful to consider when designing HCR-20 training packages.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study demonstrates the importance of engaging clinicians in bespoke training on the practicalities of HCR-20 completion and the fundamentals of risk formulation.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis study highlights the importance of incorporating a training package for staff of all disciplines in changing perceptions of risk management tools and thus their use in the practical management of violence. The useful aspects of training may assist changing perceptions of the role that risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 play in the assessment and management of violence.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research suggests that if this can be done successfully, it may lead to a change in the perception of the role that the HCR-20v3 can play in assessing risk of violence and generating meaningful management plans to reduce the future likelihood of violence.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jfp-05-2019-0019\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-05-2019-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-05-2019-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的评估和管理对他人的风险是临床实践的一个组成部分,特别是在法医和其他精神病学环境中。HCR-20的第3版是基于结构化专业判断模型的一套全面的专业指南的最新版本。它是评估暴力风险的最广泛使用和最有效的工具;然而,临床医生认为这是一项额外的任务,临床用途有限,需要进行昂贵的培训,需要相当长的时间来实施。本文旨在探讨这些问题。对148名临床医生进行了培训,以改善对风险制定的认识,并将HCR-20v3作为制定个人和健全的护理计划以尽量减少暴力风险的有效和临床有用工具。结果表明,培训后得分显著提高,表明在HCR-20的有用性、对工作的预期影响、对风险管理的预期影响、完成的便利性和对临床实践的感知相关性方面,对HCR-20的重视程度更高。这也与定性反馈一致,表明改进了风险管理和护理计划,参考了学习如何支持各自的角色。反馈还强调了所提供培训的某些方面的附加价值,在设计难民专员办事处-20培训包时可能会考虑到这一点。研究局限性/意义本研究证明了临床医生参与HCR-20完成的实用性和风险制定基础的定制培训的重要性。实际影响本研究强调了为所有学科的工作人员纳入一套培训方案的重要性,以改变对风险管理工具的看法,从而在实际暴力管理中使用这些工具。培训的有用方面可能有助于改变人们对风险制定和难民署-20v3在评估和管理暴力方面所起作用的认识。独创性/价值本研究表明,如果能够成功地做到这一点,它可能会导致人们对HCR-20v3在评估暴力风险和制定有意义的管理计划以减少未来暴力可能性方面可以发挥的作用的看法发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changing clinicians’ perceptions of the role that risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 play in the assessment and management of violence
Purpose The assessment and management of risk towards others is an integral part of clinical practice, particularly in forensic and other psychiatric settings. Version 3 of the HCR-20 is the latest version of a comprehensive set of professional guidelines based on the Structured Professional Judgement model. It is the most widely used and best validated tool available to assess risk of violence; however, clinicians perceive it as an additional task with limited clinical usefulness, which requires undergoing expensive training and takes considerable time to implement. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach Training was delivered to 148 clinicians to improve perceptions with regard to risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 as an effective and clinically useful tool in generating individual and robust care plans to minimise risk of violence. Findings Results indicated significant score increase post-training, indicating higher regard for the HCR-20 in terms of its usefulness, anticipated impact upon working, anticipated impact upon managing risk, ease of completion and perceived relevance to clinical practice. This was also consistent with qualitative feedback indicating improved risk management and care planning with reference to how learning would support respective roles. Feedback also highlighted the added value of certain aspects of the training provided, which may be useful to consider when designing HCR-20 training packages. Research limitations/implications This study demonstrates the importance of engaging clinicians in bespoke training on the practicalities of HCR-20 completion and the fundamentals of risk formulation. Practical implications This study highlights the importance of incorporating a training package for staff of all disciplines in changing perceptions of risk management tools and thus their use in the practical management of violence. The useful aspects of training may assist changing perceptions of the role that risk formulation and the HCR-20v3 play in the assessment and management of violence. Originality/value This research suggests that if this can be done successfully, it may lead to a change in the perception of the role that the HCR-20v3 can play in assessing risk of violence and generating meaningful management plans to reduce the future likelihood of violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Practice
Journal of Forensic Practice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Two studies evaluating the Stoicism programme at a foreign national prison A preliminary exploration of using the power threat meaning framework with individuals currently serving IPP sentences in custody Enough is enough: treatment dropout predictors of adolescents with harmful sexual behaviors in a New Zealand community sample Are indeterminate sentenced prisoners prepared for open prison? Practical implications/applications of an exploratory study in an English open prison Exploring the impact of custodial parkrun in an English women’s prison: HMPPS psychologists and partners delivering a best practice evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1