影响加纳建筑业安全方案执行情况的因素

IF 0.6 Q4 MANAGEMENT Acta Structilia Pub Date : 2018-11-30 DOI:10.18820/24150487/AS25I2.2
K. Agyekum, B. Simons, Seth Yeboah Botchway
{"title":"影响加纳建筑业安全方案执行情况的因素","authors":"K. Agyekum, B. Simons, Seth Yeboah Botchway","doi":"10.18820/24150487/AS25I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although proper safety management in construction is of prime importance, evidence from literature suggests that many developing countries do not consider safety adequately. This article examines the factors that influence the performance of safety management programmes in the Ghanaian Construction Industry. The objectives set to achieve this aim include identifying the safety elements incorporated in the safety programmes of construction firms, and determining the factors that negatively influence the performance of such elements. For objectivity, a quantitative survey was conducted among safety managers of 60 D1 building construction firms located in the Kumasi and Greater Accra regions of Ghana. The questionnaire was structured into three parts, which sought the respondents’ profile, identified the safety elements incorporated in the firms’ safety programmes, and identified the factors that negatively influence the performance of the safety elements. Following a detailed literature review, the respondents were asked to rate 13 elements and 17 factors on a Likert scale. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22. In addition to determining the reliability of the various constructs, the MSs, modes and standard deviations were obtained. The findings revealed that all of the 13 elements were incorporated in the firms’ safety programmes. The key elements identified include ‘providing safety managers on site’; ‘providing written and comprehensive safety and health plans’; ‘introducing project-specific training and regular safety meetings’; ‘providing safety and health orientation training’, and ‘involving employees in safety and evaluation’. The findings further revealed that 16 of the 17 factors negatively influence the performance of the firms’ safety programmes. The identified factors were, among others, ‘insufficient communication of safety programmes’; ‘lack of workers’ self-protection and awareness’; ‘contractors ignoring safety, due to the time pressures of the project schedule’; ‘poor personal attitudes towards safety’, and ‘ineffective laws and lack of enforcement’. Findings from this study should be useful to construction practitioners seeking to improve the safety records of their firms. Keywords : Safety performance, safety programmes, safety elements, construction projects","PeriodicalId":42571,"journal":{"name":"Acta Structilia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing the performance of safety programmes in the Ghanaian construction industry\",\"authors\":\"K. Agyekum, B. Simons, Seth Yeboah Botchway\",\"doi\":\"10.18820/24150487/AS25I2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although proper safety management in construction is of prime importance, evidence from literature suggests that many developing countries do not consider safety adequately. This article examines the factors that influence the performance of safety management programmes in the Ghanaian Construction Industry. The objectives set to achieve this aim include identifying the safety elements incorporated in the safety programmes of construction firms, and determining the factors that negatively influence the performance of such elements. For objectivity, a quantitative survey was conducted among safety managers of 60 D1 building construction firms located in the Kumasi and Greater Accra regions of Ghana. The questionnaire was structured into three parts, which sought the respondents’ profile, identified the safety elements incorporated in the firms’ safety programmes, and identified the factors that negatively influence the performance of the safety elements. Following a detailed literature review, the respondents were asked to rate 13 elements and 17 factors on a Likert scale. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22. In addition to determining the reliability of the various constructs, the MSs, modes and standard deviations were obtained. The findings revealed that all of the 13 elements were incorporated in the firms’ safety programmes. The key elements identified include ‘providing safety managers on site’; ‘providing written and comprehensive safety and health plans’; ‘introducing project-specific training and regular safety meetings’; ‘providing safety and health orientation training’, and ‘involving employees in safety and evaluation’. The findings further revealed that 16 of the 17 factors negatively influence the performance of the firms’ safety programmes. The identified factors were, among others, ‘insufficient communication of safety programmes’; ‘lack of workers’ self-protection and awareness’; ‘contractors ignoring safety, due to the time pressures of the project schedule’; ‘poor personal attitudes towards safety’, and ‘ineffective laws and lack of enforcement’. Findings from this study should be useful to construction practitioners seeking to improve the safety records of their firms. Keywords : Safety performance, safety programmes, safety elements, construction projects\",\"PeriodicalId\":42571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Structilia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Structilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150487/AS25I2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Structilia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150487/AS25I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

尽管施工中的适当安全管理至关重要,但文献证据表明,许多发展中国家没有充分考虑安全问题。本文考察了影响加纳建筑业安全管理计划绩效的因素。为实现这一目标而设定的目标包括确定建筑公司安全计划中包含的安全要素,并确定对这些要素的性能产生负面影响的因素。为了客观起见,对位于加纳库马西和大阿克拉地区的60家D1建筑施工公司的安全经理进行了定量调查。问卷分为三个部分,调查对象的概况,确定了公司安全计划中包含的安全要素,并确定了对安全要素绩效产生负面影响的因素。在详细的文献回顾之后,受访者被要求在Likert量表上对13个要素和17个因素进行评分。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第22版对数据进行分析。除了确定各种结构的可靠性外,还获得了MS、模式和标准偏差。调查结果显示,这13项要素都被纳入了公司的安全计划。确定的关键要素包括“在现场提供安全管理人员”提供书面和全面的安全和健康计划引入项目具体培训和定期安全会议提供安全和健康指导培训”,以及“让员工参与安全和评估”。调查结果进一步显示,17个因素中有16个对公司安全计划的绩效产生了负面影响。已确定的因素包括“安全计划沟通不足”缺乏工人的自我保护和意识由于项目进度的时间压力,承包商忽视安全个人对安全的不良态度”,以及“无效的法律和缺乏执行”。这项研究的结果应该对寻求改善其公司安全记录的建筑从业者有用。关键词:安全绩效、安全方案、安全要素、建设项目
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing the performance of safety programmes in the Ghanaian construction industry
Although proper safety management in construction is of prime importance, evidence from literature suggests that many developing countries do not consider safety adequately. This article examines the factors that influence the performance of safety management programmes in the Ghanaian Construction Industry. The objectives set to achieve this aim include identifying the safety elements incorporated in the safety programmes of construction firms, and determining the factors that negatively influence the performance of such elements. For objectivity, a quantitative survey was conducted among safety managers of 60 D1 building construction firms located in the Kumasi and Greater Accra regions of Ghana. The questionnaire was structured into three parts, which sought the respondents’ profile, identified the safety elements incorporated in the firms’ safety programmes, and identified the factors that negatively influence the performance of the safety elements. Following a detailed literature review, the respondents were asked to rate 13 elements and 17 factors on a Likert scale. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22. In addition to determining the reliability of the various constructs, the MSs, modes and standard deviations were obtained. The findings revealed that all of the 13 elements were incorporated in the firms’ safety programmes. The key elements identified include ‘providing safety managers on site’; ‘providing written and comprehensive safety and health plans’; ‘introducing project-specific training and regular safety meetings’; ‘providing safety and health orientation training’, and ‘involving employees in safety and evaluation’. The findings further revealed that 16 of the 17 factors negatively influence the performance of the firms’ safety programmes. The identified factors were, among others, ‘insufficient communication of safety programmes’; ‘lack of workers’ self-protection and awareness’; ‘contractors ignoring safety, due to the time pressures of the project schedule’; ‘poor personal attitudes towards safety’, and ‘ineffective laws and lack of enforcement’. Findings from this study should be useful to construction practitioners seeking to improve the safety records of their firms. Keywords : Safety performance, safety programmes, safety elements, construction projects
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Structilia
Acta Structilia MANAGEMENT-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of labour-intensive productivity for construction projects in Ghana Labour productivity in construction SMEs: Perspectives from South Africa Predictors of corruption among town planners: A Nigerian case study Impact of urban renewal changes on urban landscape identity: Case study of Kisumu City, Kenya A conceptual quality improvement protocol for Free State public works projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1