{"title":"致《健康与安全政策与实践》主编的信","authors":"L. Bellamy","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sir, I am writing this letter at the invitation of Taylor and Francis to correct a misrepresentation of my views and a misleading conclusion with respect to my published work (Bellamy, 2015) on an analysis of occupational accidents from the Storybuilder database of the National Institute of Public Health & the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands. In 2017, a special issue of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety appeared in which the ‘Vision Zero’ concept of occupational safety was addressed by a small group of authors under the editorship of Patrick Waterson (Waterson, 2017). Amongst the authors was Sidney Dekker who wrote a critical paper on the Vision Zero concept (Dekker, 2017). There are three aspects of this paper that I wish to contest. The first involves a quote, the second involves an incorrect statement about my relationship to the analysis of the original data, and the third is about what my research allegedly shows and hence the position I am taking. This published paper by Dekker takes a quote from a paper by me in Safety Science (Bellamy, 2015) out of context. Dekker starts in the middle of my sentence but uses a capital letter, thereby creating the illusion that I started the sentence there. The text in the quote is actually my description of someone else’s model but Dekker presents it in such a way as to suggest this is my point of view. On p.4 he says (Dekker, 2017):","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter to the Editor-in-Chief of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"authors\":\"L. Bellamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sir, I am writing this letter at the invitation of Taylor and Francis to correct a misrepresentation of my views and a misleading conclusion with respect to my published work (Bellamy, 2015) on an analysis of occupational accidents from the Storybuilder database of the National Institute of Public Health & the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands. In 2017, a special issue of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety appeared in which the ‘Vision Zero’ concept of occupational safety was addressed by a small group of authors under the editorship of Patrick Waterson (Waterson, 2017). Amongst the authors was Sidney Dekker who wrote a critical paper on the Vision Zero concept (Dekker, 2017). There are three aspects of this paper that I wish to contest. The first involves a quote, the second involves an incorrect statement about my relationship to the analysis of the original data, and the third is about what my research allegedly shows and hence the position I am taking. This published paper by Dekker takes a quote from a paper by me in Safety Science (Bellamy, 2015) out of context. Dekker starts in the middle of my sentence but uses a capital letter, thereby creating the illusion that I started the sentence there. The text in the quote is actually my description of someone else’s model but Dekker presents it in such a way as to suggest this is my point of view. On p.4 he says (Dekker, 2017):\",\"PeriodicalId\":43946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1600307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Letter to the Editor-in-Chief of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Sir, I am writing this letter at the invitation of Taylor and Francis to correct a misrepresentation of my views and a misleading conclusion with respect to my published work (Bellamy, 2015) on an analysis of occupational accidents from the Storybuilder database of the National Institute of Public Health & the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands. In 2017, a special issue of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety appeared in which the ‘Vision Zero’ concept of occupational safety was addressed by a small group of authors under the editorship of Patrick Waterson (Waterson, 2017). Amongst the authors was Sidney Dekker who wrote a critical paper on the Vision Zero concept (Dekker, 2017). There are three aspects of this paper that I wish to contest. The first involves a quote, the second involves an incorrect statement about my relationship to the analysis of the original data, and the third is about what my research allegedly shows and hence the position I am taking. This published paper by Dekker takes a quote from a paper by me in Safety Science (Bellamy, 2015) out of context. Dekker starts in the middle of my sentence but uses a capital letter, thereby creating the illusion that I started the sentence there. The text in the quote is actually my description of someone else’s model but Dekker presents it in such a way as to suggest this is my point of view. On p.4 he says (Dekker, 2017):