森林生态系统变化中植物群落动态建模研究进展

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Botany Letters Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1080/23818107.2023.2231045
G. Decocq, P. Regnault, J. Lenoir, F. Paccaut, Laurent di Menza, Gauthier Delvoye, E. Janvresse, D. Closset‐Kopp, O. Goubet
{"title":"森林生态系统变化中植物群落动态建模研究进展","authors":"G. Decocq, P. Regnault, J. Lenoir, F. Paccaut, Laurent di Menza, Gauthier Delvoye, E. Janvresse, D. Closset‐Kopp, O. Goubet","doi":"10.1080/23818107.2023.2231045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Modelling plant community dynamics in a context of changing environment is an old task but still a timely challenge, especially for the most complex of them, namely forest plant communities. Progress in mathematics and computer science has allowed to incorporate an increasing number of parameters and to make models more and more realistic, often to the detriment of their analytical tractability. Here, we successively review the key aspects of forest plant community dynamics, and how they are accounted for by demographic and spatial models. Demographic models address the dynamics of a community at a local scale, and can be either continuous or discrete in time, purely deterministic or stochastic. Scaling up the dynamics of local communities to a landscape scale supposes to use spatial models, which can incorporate spatial heterogeneity and species dispersal. Aside spatially-implicit models, spatially explicit models treat space either as a continuous or a discrete variable, leading to different mathematical formalisms. Compared to statistical models, mechanistic models have a higher predictive power under changing environment (i.e. model extrapolation as opposed to model interpolation for which statistical models perform better) and are thus increasingly popular. However, as their complexity increases, their mathematical tractability decreases and mechanistic models are chiefly used for simulations. In this review, we analyse the pros and cons of the most widely used modelling frameworks in plant ecology and finally provide some perspectives.","PeriodicalId":54302,"journal":{"name":"Botany Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling plant community dynamics in changing forest ecosystems: a review\",\"authors\":\"G. Decocq, P. Regnault, J. Lenoir, F. Paccaut, Laurent di Menza, Gauthier Delvoye, E. Janvresse, D. Closset‐Kopp, O. Goubet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23818107.2023.2231045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Modelling plant community dynamics in a context of changing environment is an old task but still a timely challenge, especially for the most complex of them, namely forest plant communities. Progress in mathematics and computer science has allowed to incorporate an increasing number of parameters and to make models more and more realistic, often to the detriment of their analytical tractability. Here, we successively review the key aspects of forest plant community dynamics, and how they are accounted for by demographic and spatial models. Demographic models address the dynamics of a community at a local scale, and can be either continuous or discrete in time, purely deterministic or stochastic. Scaling up the dynamics of local communities to a landscape scale supposes to use spatial models, which can incorporate spatial heterogeneity and species dispersal. Aside spatially-implicit models, spatially explicit models treat space either as a continuous or a discrete variable, leading to different mathematical formalisms. Compared to statistical models, mechanistic models have a higher predictive power under changing environment (i.e. model extrapolation as opposed to model interpolation for which statistical models perform better) and are thus increasingly popular. However, as their complexity increases, their mathematical tractability decreases and mechanistic models are chiefly used for simulations. In this review, we analyse the pros and cons of the most widely used modelling frameworks in plant ecology and finally provide some perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Botany Letters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Botany Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2023.2231045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botany Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2023.2231045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling plant community dynamics in changing forest ecosystems: a review
ABSTRACT Modelling plant community dynamics in a context of changing environment is an old task but still a timely challenge, especially for the most complex of them, namely forest plant communities. Progress in mathematics and computer science has allowed to incorporate an increasing number of parameters and to make models more and more realistic, often to the detriment of their analytical tractability. Here, we successively review the key aspects of forest plant community dynamics, and how they are accounted for by demographic and spatial models. Demographic models address the dynamics of a community at a local scale, and can be either continuous or discrete in time, purely deterministic or stochastic. Scaling up the dynamics of local communities to a landscape scale supposes to use spatial models, which can incorporate spatial heterogeneity and species dispersal. Aside spatially-implicit models, spatially explicit models treat space either as a continuous or a discrete variable, leading to different mathematical formalisms. Compared to statistical models, mechanistic models have a higher predictive power under changing environment (i.e. model extrapolation as opposed to model interpolation for which statistical models perform better) and are thus increasingly popular. However, as their complexity increases, their mathematical tractability decreases and mechanistic models are chiefly used for simulations. In this review, we analyse the pros and cons of the most widely used modelling frameworks in plant ecology and finally provide some perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Botany Letters
Botany Letters Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Botany Letters is an international scientific journal, published by the French Botanical Society (Société botanique de France) in partnership with Taylor & Francis. Botany Letters replaces Acta Botanica Gallica, which was created in 1993, building on over a century of renowned publications by the Société botanique de France.
期刊最新文献
Transcriptomic analysis reveals differential gene expression patterns during cannabis leaf morphogenesis and phase transition A new heteropolar Staurosirella species (Staurosiraceae, Bacillariophyceae), widely distributed in Europe Floral structure and nectary anatomy of Bertholletia excelsa (Lecythidaceae) The effect of pollen origin (self- and cross-pollination) on seed production and viability in Ophrys (Orchidaceae) Is there variation in ten woody species reproductive phenology within the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1