{"title":"创建可见性:KPI作为新冠肺炎大流行中的治理技术","authors":"Rosa Esteban-Arrea","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2023.2175166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parisi and Bekier (2022) explore the role of performance measurement systems as technologies of government relying on the notion of ‘governmentality’. Specifically, they focus on the relevance of key performance indicators (KPIs) in evaluating and managing the effects of COVID-19 on a sample of six European cities involved in a European project to create circular economy-oriented cities. Despite the need for engaged citizens and governments in redirecting urbanisation to drive a positive change for humanity and the life-supporting systems that we depend upon (Andersson et al. 2014), there is a lack of studies exploring the role of cities (Lapsley, Miller, and Panozzo 2010) in sustainable development and circular economy (Czarniawska 2010). This article not only focuses on cities as the main driver of the circular economy but also contributes to the limited literature concerning the role of accounting in crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Parisi and Bekier 2022). Parisi and Bekier (2022) focus on the capacity of accounting to shape governance practices in response to the project ́s objectives through KPIs. This paper adopted a qualitative method consisting of several interviews with the leaders of each city’s project. They found that KPIs became the benchmark by which project managers adapted their activities and governance practices and transformed them to adapt to the impacts of the pandemic. As a consequence, they were able to achieve the expectations laid out by the performance indicators. Therefore, KPIs were a flexible tool that helped envision the necessary changes to meet the targets set before the pandemic. In addition to the empirical evidence mentioned, they also rely on theoretical arguments on the role of accounting as a governance practice and the capacity of local programmes to adapt to the ongoing situation. They conclude by stressing the role of accounting, particularly of KPIs, as a technology of government that contributed to making the COVID-19 pandemic calculable and quantifiable. Additionally, KPIs helped to represent the effects of the pandemic by creating visibilities, by making certain issues of the pandemic calculable and governable. Therefore, they could identify different possibilities of intervention while also obscuring others. This paper contributes to the existing literature by showing the role of accounting in governance practices and the process by which accounting helps in the evaluation and","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"89 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Visibilities: KPIs as a Technology of Governance within Covid-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Esteban-Arrea\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0969160X.2023.2175166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parisi and Bekier (2022) explore the role of performance measurement systems as technologies of government relying on the notion of ‘governmentality’. Specifically, they focus on the relevance of key performance indicators (KPIs) in evaluating and managing the effects of COVID-19 on a sample of six European cities involved in a European project to create circular economy-oriented cities. Despite the need for engaged citizens and governments in redirecting urbanisation to drive a positive change for humanity and the life-supporting systems that we depend upon (Andersson et al. 2014), there is a lack of studies exploring the role of cities (Lapsley, Miller, and Panozzo 2010) in sustainable development and circular economy (Czarniawska 2010). This article not only focuses on cities as the main driver of the circular economy but also contributes to the limited literature concerning the role of accounting in crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Parisi and Bekier 2022). Parisi and Bekier (2022) focus on the capacity of accounting to shape governance practices in response to the project ́s objectives through KPIs. This paper adopted a qualitative method consisting of several interviews with the leaders of each city’s project. They found that KPIs became the benchmark by which project managers adapted their activities and governance practices and transformed them to adapt to the impacts of the pandemic. As a consequence, they were able to achieve the expectations laid out by the performance indicators. Therefore, KPIs were a flexible tool that helped envision the necessary changes to meet the targets set before the pandemic. In addition to the empirical evidence mentioned, they also rely on theoretical arguments on the role of accounting as a governance practice and the capacity of local programmes to adapt to the ongoing situation. They conclude by stressing the role of accounting, particularly of KPIs, as a technology of government that contributed to making the COVID-19 pandemic calculable and quantifiable. Additionally, KPIs helped to represent the effects of the pandemic by creating visibilities, by making certain issues of the pandemic calculable and governable. Therefore, they could identify different possibilities of intervention while also obscuring others. This paper contributes to the existing literature by showing the role of accounting in governance practices and the process by which accounting helps in the evaluation and\",\"PeriodicalId\":38053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"89 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2023.2175166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2023.2175166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Creating Visibilities: KPIs as a Technology of Governance within Covid-19 Pandemic
Parisi and Bekier (2022) explore the role of performance measurement systems as technologies of government relying on the notion of ‘governmentality’. Specifically, they focus on the relevance of key performance indicators (KPIs) in evaluating and managing the effects of COVID-19 on a sample of six European cities involved in a European project to create circular economy-oriented cities. Despite the need for engaged citizens and governments in redirecting urbanisation to drive a positive change for humanity and the life-supporting systems that we depend upon (Andersson et al. 2014), there is a lack of studies exploring the role of cities (Lapsley, Miller, and Panozzo 2010) in sustainable development and circular economy (Czarniawska 2010). This article not only focuses on cities as the main driver of the circular economy but also contributes to the limited literature concerning the role of accounting in crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Parisi and Bekier 2022). Parisi and Bekier (2022) focus on the capacity of accounting to shape governance practices in response to the project ́s objectives through KPIs. This paper adopted a qualitative method consisting of several interviews with the leaders of each city’s project. They found that KPIs became the benchmark by which project managers adapted their activities and governance practices and transformed them to adapt to the impacts of the pandemic. As a consequence, they were able to achieve the expectations laid out by the performance indicators. Therefore, KPIs were a flexible tool that helped envision the necessary changes to meet the targets set before the pandemic. In addition to the empirical evidence mentioned, they also rely on theoretical arguments on the role of accounting as a governance practice and the capacity of local programmes to adapt to the ongoing situation. They conclude by stressing the role of accounting, particularly of KPIs, as a technology of government that contributed to making the COVID-19 pandemic calculable and quantifiable. Additionally, KPIs helped to represent the effects of the pandemic by creating visibilities, by making certain issues of the pandemic calculable and governable. Therefore, they could identify different possibilities of intervention while also obscuring others. This paper contributes to the existing literature by showing the role of accounting in governance practices and the process by which accounting helps in the evaluation and
期刊介绍:
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal (SEAJ) is the official Journal of The Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. It is a predominantly refereed Journal committed to the creation of a new academic literature in the broad field of social, environmental and sustainable development accounting, accountability, reporting and auditing. The Journal provides a forum for a wide range of different forms of academic and academic-related communications whose aim is to balance honesty and scholarly rigour with directness, clarity, policy-relevance and novelty. SEAJ welcomes all contributions that fulfil the criteria of the journal, including empirical papers, review papers and essays, manuscripts reporting or proposing engagement, commentaries and polemics, and reviews of articles or books. A key feature of SEAJ is that papers are shorter than the word length typically anticipated in academic journals in the social sciences. A clearer breakdown of the proposed word length for each type of paper in SEAJ can be found here.