迈克尔·弗雷德和哲学史

IF 0.8 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY British Journal for the History of Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1080/09608788.2023.2178733
C. Normore
{"title":"迈克尔·弗雷德和哲学史","authors":"C. Normore","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2178733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last half of the twentieth century, some of the most prominent historians of Philosophy turned their attention to the historiography of the subject. Arguably the most important and most influential of these was Michael Frede and thanks to Katerina Ierodiakonou and those who assisted her in the production of this volume most of his most important writing on the subject is now available, much of it for the first time. Central questions these writings address are what is the History of Philosophy and to whom (and why) does it matter? One crucial distinction which I think we owe in good measure to Frede is that between a discipline and its subject matter – a distinction often blurred in language. I attempt to capture this distinction by capitalizing the term for discipline and not that for the subject matter. Thus Geology studies geology, the structure and formation of the planet Earth. Both Geology and geology have a past; the past of geology extends roughly 4.5 billion years; the past of Geology a few centuries. Sometimes the past of something is termed its history but, as Frede usually did, I reserve the word ‘history’ (with a small ‘h’) for descriptions of the past and History (with a capital ‘H’) for the subject which studies such descriptions. By a philosophy, I understand a collection of (typically propositional) items ordered by reasons and bearing on a philosophical issue – where what is to be counted as a philosophical issue is itself a philosophical issue. Philosophy, the discipline, studies such philosophies, attempting to understand the items they contain and the connections among them. By a history, I understand a description of a temporally ordered sequence of causally connected items. The History of philosophy would study histories of philosophies, i.e. descriptions of how philosophies themselves evolve (if they do) while the History of Philosophy studies histories of Philosophy, where a history of Philosophy is a description of a temporally ordered sequence of events involving the adoption or rejection of philosophies. In “The Study of Ancient Philosophy”, his 1987 introductory essay to the volume of his papers titled Essays in Ancient Philosophy and reprinted in this volume, Frede took pains to distinguish the past of Philosophy from its study.","PeriodicalId":51792,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","volume":"31 1","pages":"1049 - 1055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Michael Frede and the history of philosophy\",\"authors\":\"C. Normore\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09608788.2023.2178733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last half of the twentieth century, some of the most prominent historians of Philosophy turned their attention to the historiography of the subject. Arguably the most important and most influential of these was Michael Frede and thanks to Katerina Ierodiakonou and those who assisted her in the production of this volume most of his most important writing on the subject is now available, much of it for the first time. Central questions these writings address are what is the History of Philosophy and to whom (and why) does it matter? One crucial distinction which I think we owe in good measure to Frede is that between a discipline and its subject matter – a distinction often blurred in language. I attempt to capture this distinction by capitalizing the term for discipline and not that for the subject matter. Thus Geology studies geology, the structure and formation of the planet Earth. Both Geology and geology have a past; the past of geology extends roughly 4.5 billion years; the past of Geology a few centuries. Sometimes the past of something is termed its history but, as Frede usually did, I reserve the word ‘history’ (with a small ‘h’) for descriptions of the past and History (with a capital ‘H’) for the subject which studies such descriptions. By a philosophy, I understand a collection of (typically propositional) items ordered by reasons and bearing on a philosophical issue – where what is to be counted as a philosophical issue is itself a philosophical issue. Philosophy, the discipline, studies such philosophies, attempting to understand the items they contain and the connections among them. By a history, I understand a description of a temporally ordered sequence of causally connected items. The History of philosophy would study histories of philosophies, i.e. descriptions of how philosophies themselves evolve (if they do) while the History of Philosophy studies histories of Philosophy, where a history of Philosophy is a description of a temporally ordered sequence of events involving the adoption or rejection of philosophies. In “The Study of Ancient Philosophy”, his 1987 introductory essay to the volume of his papers titled Essays in Ancient Philosophy and reprinted in this volume, Frede took pains to distinguish the past of Philosophy from its study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal for the History of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"1049 - 1055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal for the History of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2023.2178733\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2023.2178733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在二十世纪下半叶,一些最著名的哲学历史学家将注意力转向了这一主题的史学。可以说,其中最重要、最有影响力的是迈克尔·弗雷德,多亏了卡特琳娜·伊罗迪亚科诺和那些帮助她制作这本书的人,他关于这个主题的大部分最重要的作品现在都有了,其中大部分是第一次。这些著作解决的核心问题是什么是哲学史,它对谁(以及为什么)重要?我认为我们在很大程度上要归功于Frede的一个关键区别是学科及其主题之间的区别——这种区别在语言中往往是模糊的。我试图通过大写“纪律”而不是“主题”来捕捉这种区别。因此,地质学研究地质、地球的结构和形成。地质学和地质学都有过去;地质学的历史大约延续了45亿年;地质学的过去几个世纪。有时,一件事的过去被称为它的历史,但正如弗雷德通常所做的那样,我保留“历史”一词(带小“h”)来描述过去,而历史(带大写“h”)则用于研究这种描述的主题。从哲学的角度来看,我理解了一系列(通常是命题)项目,这些项目是按原因排序的,与哲学问题有关——在哲学问题中,被视为哲学问题的东西本身就是哲学问题。哲学,这门学科,研究这样的哲学,试图理解它们所包含的项目以及它们之间的联系。通过历史,我理解了对因果连接项目的时间顺序的描述。哲学史将研究哲学史,即对哲学本身如何演变的描述(如果是这样的话),而哲学史研究哲学史。哲学史是对涉及采纳或拒绝哲学的时间顺序事件的描述。在《古代哲学研究》(The Study of Ancient Philosophy。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Michael Frede and the history of philosophy
In the last half of the twentieth century, some of the most prominent historians of Philosophy turned their attention to the historiography of the subject. Arguably the most important and most influential of these was Michael Frede and thanks to Katerina Ierodiakonou and those who assisted her in the production of this volume most of his most important writing on the subject is now available, much of it for the first time. Central questions these writings address are what is the History of Philosophy and to whom (and why) does it matter? One crucial distinction which I think we owe in good measure to Frede is that between a discipline and its subject matter – a distinction often blurred in language. I attempt to capture this distinction by capitalizing the term for discipline and not that for the subject matter. Thus Geology studies geology, the structure and formation of the planet Earth. Both Geology and geology have a past; the past of geology extends roughly 4.5 billion years; the past of Geology a few centuries. Sometimes the past of something is termed its history but, as Frede usually did, I reserve the word ‘history’ (with a small ‘h’) for descriptions of the past and History (with a capital ‘H’) for the subject which studies such descriptions. By a philosophy, I understand a collection of (typically propositional) items ordered by reasons and bearing on a philosophical issue – where what is to be counted as a philosophical issue is itself a philosophical issue. Philosophy, the discipline, studies such philosophies, attempting to understand the items they contain and the connections among them. By a history, I understand a description of a temporally ordered sequence of causally connected items. The History of philosophy would study histories of philosophies, i.e. descriptions of how philosophies themselves evolve (if they do) while the History of Philosophy studies histories of Philosophy, where a history of Philosophy is a description of a temporally ordered sequence of events involving the adoption or rejection of philosophies. In “The Study of Ancient Philosophy”, his 1987 introductory essay to the volume of his papers titled Essays in Ancient Philosophy and reprinted in this volume, Frede took pains to distinguish the past of Philosophy from its study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: BJHP publishes articles and reviews on the history of philosophy and related intellectual history from the ancient world to the end of the 20th Century. The journal is designed to foster understanding of the history of philosophy through studying the texts of past philosophers in the context - intellectual, political and social - in which the text was created. Although focusing on the recognized classics, a feature of the journal is to give attention to less major figures and to disciplines other than philosophy which impinge on the history of philosophy including political theory, religion and the natural sciences in so far as they illuminate the history of philosophy.
期刊最新文献
Peter of Mantua and the ‘piecemeal’ conception of substantial change* A taxonomy of divisibilism and Gregory of Rimini’s place Helen Knight and Margaret Macdonald on the meaning of ‘good’ Du Châtelet's causal idealism A resolute reading of Iris Murdoch’s Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1