界定澳大利亚极右翼:提出三重类型,同时考虑立法和上市条例

Kristy Campion, M. Nolan, N. O'Brien
{"title":"界定澳大利亚极右翼:提出三重类型,同时考虑立法和上市条例","authors":"Kristy Campion, M. Nolan, N. O'Brien","doi":"10.1080/18335330.2023.2165136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The contemporary extreme right is home to diverse milieus, some of which challenge or confuse stereotypical understandings of the threat. This study seeks to describe and organise the different milieus of the Australian extreme right into a typology based on the past decade of observable violent activities. The typology proposes a threefold way to view the Australian extreme right: 1. ethnocentric milieus, who asymmetrically evaluate other peoples and cultures, commonly informed by abstractions and preconceptions, especially as related to religion or ethnicity; 2. anti-government milieus, who fixate on the government and its policies as the primary source of societal woes; and 3. religious milieus, spanning numerous religious traditions and faiths, who anchor their worldviews in theological constructions. Having developed this typology, we revisited counteractions anchored in international practice and domestic legislation. We suggest that the existing domestic legislative environment is sufficient to manage these threats when informed by international practice.","PeriodicalId":37849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism","volume":"18 1","pages":"282 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing the Australian extreme right: proposing a threefold typology with consideration of legislation and listing regulations\",\"authors\":\"Kristy Campion, M. Nolan, N. O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18335330.2023.2165136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The contemporary extreme right is home to diverse milieus, some of which challenge or confuse stereotypical understandings of the threat. This study seeks to describe and organise the different milieus of the Australian extreme right into a typology based on the past decade of observable violent activities. The typology proposes a threefold way to view the Australian extreme right: 1. ethnocentric milieus, who asymmetrically evaluate other peoples and cultures, commonly informed by abstractions and preconceptions, especially as related to religion or ethnicity; 2. anti-government milieus, who fixate on the government and its policies as the primary source of societal woes; and 3. religious milieus, spanning numerous religious traditions and faiths, who anchor their worldviews in theological constructions. Having developed this typology, we revisited counteractions anchored in international practice and domestic legislation. We suggest that the existing domestic legislative environment is sufficient to manage these threats when informed by international practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"282 - 306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2023.2165136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2023.2165136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代极右翼是多元化环境的家园,其中一些挑战或混淆了对威胁的刻板理解。本研究试图根据过去十年可观察到的暴力活动,将澳大利亚极右翼的不同环境描述和组织成一个类型学。该类型学提出了一种三重方式来看待澳大利亚的极右翼:1。以种族为中心的人,他们不对称地评价其他民族和文化,通常受到抽象和先入为主的观念的影响,特别是与宗教或种族有关的;2. 反政府势力,他们把政府及其政策视为社会灾难的主要根源;和3。宗教背景,跨越许多宗教传统和信仰,他们的世界观锚定在神学结构。在发展了这种类型之后,我们重新审视了以国际实践和国内立法为基础的对抗措施。我们建议,在借鉴国际惯例的情况下,现有的国内立法环境足以应付这些威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Framing the Australian extreme right: proposing a threefold typology with consideration of legislation and listing regulations
ABSTRACT The contemporary extreme right is home to diverse milieus, some of which challenge or confuse stereotypical understandings of the threat. This study seeks to describe and organise the different milieus of the Australian extreme right into a typology based on the past decade of observable violent activities. The typology proposes a threefold way to view the Australian extreme right: 1. ethnocentric milieus, who asymmetrically evaluate other peoples and cultures, commonly informed by abstractions and preconceptions, especially as related to religion or ethnicity; 2. anti-government milieus, who fixate on the government and its policies as the primary source of societal woes; and 3. religious milieus, spanning numerous religious traditions and faiths, who anchor their worldviews in theological constructions. Having developed this typology, we revisited counteractions anchored in international practice and domestic legislation. We suggest that the existing domestic legislative environment is sufficient to manage these threats when informed by international practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism (JPICT) is an international peer reviewed scholarly journal that acts as a forum for those around the world undertaking high quality research and practice in the areas of: Policing studies, Intelligence studies, Terrorism and counter terrorism studies; Cyber-policing, intelligence and terrorism. The Journal offers national, regional and international perspectives on current areas of scholarly and applied debate within these fields, while addressing the practical and theoretical issues and considerations that surround them. It aims to balance the discussion of practical realities with debates and research on relevant and significant theoretical issues. The Journal has the following major aims: To publish cutting-edge and contemporary research articles, reports and reviews on relevant topics; To publish articles that explore the interface between the areas of policing, intelligence and terrorism studies; To act as an international forum for exchange and discussion; To illustrate the nexus between theory and its practical applications and vice versa.
期刊最新文献
Optimising intelligence operations for international law enforcement: harnessing THRIVE for national intelligence model advancement Deadly consequences: lessons from the evolution of terrorist attacks against United States diplomats Contemporary terrorism challenges and responses in the Indo-Pacific The false dawns over Marawi: examining the post-Marawi counterterrorism strategy in the Philippines An Indonesian way of P/CVE and interpreting the whole-of-society approach: lessons from civil society organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1